ArrantPariah wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
This standard doesn't apply to porn and strip clubs simply because whilst the sex workers in those areas are doing sexual things purely for money rather than pleasure, they aren't having sex with the people themselves. You could argue that morally, it's the same thing, but there's less personal involvement there than actually sticking your penis into someone. It's like the difference between someone buying consumer goods made in a sweatshop and someone owning a sweatshop - and no I'm not implying prostitution is inherently exploitative like sweatshops are (though it can be) it was just the only analogy that came to mind.
Dox also asked about massages. What about people who pay for the happy ending? So long as you're not penetrating the masseuse herself?
Same as with lapdances (but a bit worse because of the direct genital contact involved.) But I doubt a partner could use either habitually without it affecting our relationship. To be honest, I would be disgusted if they paid for just one erotic massage, but I'm not absolutely sure if it would be a deal-breaker. I wouldn't like it, nevertheless.
I draw a clear line at penetration because of the vulnerability involved in that act, but I'd also feel the same way if I was in a lesbian relationship and my partner was paying for oral sex because I see that in a similar way.
I realise this might seem weird and arbitrary, but my thinking is 'if they could treat sex that way with someone else, what's to stop them from treating it that way with me?' I just don't want to be with someone who sees any sex act I do, but especially the more vulnerable ones, as a service.
Also, I wouldn't pay for either a lapdance or an erotic massage myself. I prefer a partner with a similar mentality to me regarding sex because I find that fosters trust and makes the sex I have with them more enjoyable. Those two aren't absolutes but they're strong preferences.
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.