GAO: Voter ID laws suppress voting, not fraud
For example:
"Elected officials across California salivated at the prospect of putting their favorite tax measures on the Nov. 4 presidential election ballot
"The Los Angeles Community College District has prepared its own $3.5-billion property tax increase to repair and replace aging campuses"
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/12/local/me-tax12
If there is no ID and thus no residency check, then why not go in and vote to raise taxes on people in another community - who cares Or do they resolve this somehow ? But how could they if no ID is required to show residency ?
In the UK, in order to be issued with your ballot paper, you must give your address and then confirm that you are one of the people registered there. No need to show any ID. If you're at the wrong station, you will (I believe) be sent away. The system works.
I imagine a similar system could be implemented in the US with no trouble at all.
When I worked as a pollworker back in 2002 in the USA, as an assistant precinct registrar, I remember that we had to deal with people whose addresses had changed and who had moved either into or out of the precinct. I think, for people moving into the precinct, I had to write their new addresses in the book that had voter registrations. I was under the impression that another election commission official would go through the book after the election and update the voter registration with the information I wrote in the book.
I remember worrying that my bad handwriting might have messed up someone's voter registration and tried to be as clear as I could with it.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
Please elaborate on this.
The Grandfather clauses exempted people eligible to vote before the Civil War and their descendents from poll tax and literacy tests thus protecting poor and or illiterate Southern whites right to vote.
Source, please.
first one that shows up on google other than wikipedia http://www.blackpast.org/aah/grandfathe ... -1898-1915
From your link, Mr. Ayak:
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Please elaborate on this.
The Grandfather clauses exempted people eligible to vote before the Civil War and their descendents from poll tax and literacy tests thus protecting poor and or illiterate Southern whites right to vote.
Source, please.
first one that shows up on google other than wikipedia http://www.blackpast.org/aah/grandfathe ... -1898-1915
From your link, Mr. Ayak:
Mr. Ayak? Really dude? f**k off.
Also I don't know what the point of what you're highlighting there is. Considering you keep continuously insulting me I'm just going assume you're a bit dim with an inflated sense of self worth so you feel you have to get the last word in here for some reason. Do you have a good handle of the English language? Maybe there is something lost in translation.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,453
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Also I don't know what the point of what you're highlighting there is. Considering you keep continuously insulting me I'm just going assume you're a bit dim with an inflated sense of self worth so you feel you have to get the last word in here for some reason. Do you have a good handle of the English language? Maybe there is something lost in translation.
As your apperception of the interlocution escapes your acumen, perhaps it would be prudent for you to elucidate a somewhat more germane retort.
And please do not project your intellectual deficits unto others. That is rude.
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Also I don't know what the point of what you're highlighting there is. Considering you keep continuously insulting me I'm just going assume you're a bit dim with an inflated sense of self worth so you feel you have to get the last word in here for some reason. Do you have a good handle of the English language? Maybe there is something lost in translation.
As your apperception of the interlocution escapes your acumen, perhaps it would be prudent for you to elucidate a somewhat more germane retort.
And please do not project your intellectual deficits unto others. That is rude.
*tips fedora*
I would like to hear you explain your highlight in the previous post, you seem quite convinced it means something.
Are you referring to the "Mr. Ayak" reference or the "disfranchisement of southern blacks" reference?
I highlighted both in recent posts in this thread....
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Are you referring to the "Mr. Ayak" reference or the "disfranchisement of southern blacks" reference?
I highlighted both in recent posts in this thread....
I already responded to your Mr. Ayak remark and perhaps I should expand on it but yes, what is the point of highlighting the "disfranchisement of southern Blacks" in relation to my post?
Are you referring to the "Mr. Ayak" reference or the "disfranchisement of southern blacks" reference?
I highlighted both in recent posts in this thread....
I already responded to your Mr. Ayak remark and perhaps I should expand on it but yes, what is the point of highlighting the "disfranchisement of southern Blacks" in relation to my post?
The point is that even your own link demonstrates that you know very little about American history.
But when you want to make it a government provided service a requirement is implied. You can't just call any government entity and request a ride to the polls. The task would have to be assigned to an agency to provide or arrange and that would be driven by a requirement.
For the millionth time this is 2014, not 1964. Outside of a small part of one state you have demonstrated to have very little knowledge of the world beyond. Your sources of information on the outside world are obviously filtered.
Hardly a strawman or an obsession since that's what you did say you wanted. The only obsession is yours over "voter suppression".
If your sources of information are slanted then you don't really know what case is what.
As a gay black man, which you've bent over backwards to convince me that you are, I'm sure you have more of a vested interest than I.....
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Are you referring to the "Mr. Ayak" reference or the "disfranchisement of southern blacks" reference?
I highlighted both in recent posts in this thread....
I already responded to your Mr. Ayak remark and perhaps I should expand on it but yes, what is the point of highlighting the "disfranchisement of southern Blacks" in relation to my post?
The point is that even your own link demonstrates that you know very little about American history.
And what did I say that was incorrect?
Are you referring to the "Mr. Ayak" reference or the "disfranchisement of southern blacks" reference?
I highlighted both in recent posts in this thread....
I already responded to your Mr. Ayak remark and perhaps I should expand on it but yes, what is the point of highlighting the "disfranchisement of southern Blacks" in relation to my post?
The point is that even your own link demonstrates that you know very little about American history.
And what did I say that was incorrect?
I do not recall claiming that you were incorrect. Your blatant intellectual dishonesty mostly manifests itself as selective reports of history, not outright false ones.
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Are you referring to the "Mr. Ayak" reference or the "disfranchisement of southern blacks" reference?
I highlighted both in recent posts in this thread....
I already responded to your Mr. Ayak remark and perhaps I should expand on it but yes, what is the point of highlighting the "disfranchisement of southern Blacks" in relation to my post?
The point is that even your own link demonstrates that you know very little about American history.
And what did I say that was incorrect?
I do not recall claiming that you were incorrect. Your blatant intellectual dishonesty mostly manifests itself as selective reports of history, not outright false ones.
I think in your enlightened euphoria you jumped the gun, if you're implying I was discounting the racial discrimination that prevented blacks in the Jim Crow South from voting then you are wrong. The grandfather clauses were used to exempt whites from the poll taxes and literacy tests which were obviously used to disenfranchise blacks, I don't know how you misinterpreted what I said but whatever. The rest of the post which you cut out says its silly comparison to what I was arguing about in the first place which was that voter ID is not an undue burden specifically on blacks or youths. The grandfather clauses in combination along the poll taxes and literacy tests obviously discriminatory and unfair to black voters who not only at the time as they did not have access to education and live abject poverty but most whites who could not meet these requirements were exempted. Do any of these voter ID laws exempt whites or Republicans(who were ironically was the party they were disenfranchising in the Jim Crow South)?
Instead of illustrating why voter ID is unfair and discriminatory specifically against blacks you proceed to call me Klan member and say that I want to return to the Antebellum South. I feel like you are the one being dishonest here. Do you think that these laws are discriminatory in Canada or the Netherlands or any other country that has them which many do?
What's voter ID imply? Like a card with your name on it that's swiped and then you go and vote immediately after? Seems like a good way to stop fraud if it works that way. You know, making sure one person votes once (or not at all if that's their choice).
Here in Oz, you show up and they sign your name off, and then you vote.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
How to Suppress Echolalia? |
20 Oct 2024, 4:38 pm |
Trump Voter Caught Cheating and Arrested |
28 Oct 2024, 4:53 pm |
Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge voter rolls |
30 Oct 2024, 1:46 pm |