Is Paganism good or evil?

Post Reply New Topic

Where do all of you who make no difference between religions get your basis for proper behavior?

Different religions and cultures, including pagan ones, throughout the millennia have held to different standards of morality, much of which you would find absolutely horrendous today. So where do you get "it only matters how one behaves?"

How is one supposed to behave? Where do you get that standard? Who decides which way of life is right?

My philosophy is kindness and love to all living things: animals [including humans], trees, rocks, mountains, the whole earth.

I believe we pray to the best aspect of ourselves, good or bad.
Whether they can be identified as common to others is left up to debate.
My Goddess is called Arianrhod, literally, "Silver Wheel" or basically the moon. She embodies the Divine Feminine, the most perfect of womanhood. My God has many names; Lleu, Mabon or Cernunos, even the Saxon Hern. In whatever aspect, I look for him in myself. The wheel of the year, sun and moon gives the Pagan faith great diversity; good and evil are but shades of the same hue. I believe that what you give to the Universe, so shall you receive; it is a Natural Law and very true.

Important to forget as well - a great many, if not most polytheisms are actually composite monotheisms. That is to say they believe in an incomprehensible deity that manifests itself in myriad smaller and more comprehensible pieces. A lot of the Mediterranean systems of deity, by some alusion likely the Nordic, and going east the Hindu and pre-Buddhist Chinese is of that type of panentheism.

You see systems quite often also being described as having atheism at the top, deism slightly lower, and polytheism below that. That means what is at the top is so incomprehensible that to name it a living deity makes no sense and grossly personifies it, thus a lot of people in the west who are of Orphic, Hermetic, or other persuasions refer to it as the 'No Thing' . From that drops a myriad of chains of increasingly specific consciousness until you have that which is right above us that we can relate to most closely and which IS probably more likely to care what we think, say, or do than anything above it and then you have us on our level. I think that's what people tend to prefer to call 'metaphysical atheism' because while it does accept the doctrine of reincarnation, does accept immortal (ie. never born, never dying) definitions of consciousness and an march ever closer to where it came from (analogies to nirvana and paranirvana) it would agree with reductive materialists on one thing - that there's no personal deity brooding over how people behave, whether they eat pork or shellfish, whether they have sex without a wedding ring, etc. etc..

I don't know if I would call myself a Panganist, but I love ancient mythology and spirituality, love nature and the earth, and have many similar viewpoints as Wiccan healers and Wiccan magicians.