Am I the only one who finds "God" to be baffling?

Page 3 of 6 [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

06 May 2016, 7:21 am

The_Blonde_Alien wrote:
zkydz wrote:
Just in response to the title alone:

If there is a supreme being, wouldn't just that concept alone be baffling enough to fathom?


Yeah but that's not all I find baffling about it. It's the idea that one devine being is capable of:

- Communicating with millions of sapient beings each witb their own personalities, problems and qualities.

- Manipulating the weather, events, fates of people, animals, ect. all at once. Boy that's a lot to take in at once! :roll:

^ All od these things are just impossible for a single being do even do, devine or not. Unless...

Unless It's done through, oh I don't know...

Image

Which is why, being a spiritual person myself, would rather believe in the teamwork many devine beings altogether! :)


I am not clear as to what it is that you are not clear about.

Are you talking about the concept of "one god" as opposed to "no gods"?

Or are you talking about "one god" as opposed to "many gods"(like the gods of mount olympus)?

Since you're talking about "team work" in creating the world you must mean that you prefer a pagan type theology (a god for weather, a god of the sea, a god of the under world, a goddess of love, a god of war, etc) to a monotheistic one in which one deity does it all.



The_Blonde_Alien
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 863
Location: Puerto Rico

06 May 2016, 9:02 am

naturalplastic wrote:
I am not clear as to what it is that you are not clear about.

Are you talking about the concept of "one god" as opposed to "no gods"?

Or are you talking about "one god" as opposed to "many gods"(like the gods of mount olympus)?

Since you're talking about "team work" in creating the world you must mean that you prefer a pagan type theology (a god for weather, a god of the sea, a god of the under world, a goddess of love, a god of war, etc) to a monotheistic one in which one deity does it all.


Actually I do prefer a pagan sort of belief! :)

I was actually talking the concept of "one god" as opposed to "many gods" like those of mount Olympus.

A friend of mine did bring in an interesting point of view of the "one god" ideal. She said that "god" is love encarnate; the combined eforts of all the gods and goddesses fron times before. I find that to be quite intriguing! But I still see that as being far-fetched mainly because:

1. They are plenty of gods and goddesses of love out there.

2. It would be higly uikely that a group of gods and godesse would combine their efforts without having some sort of conflict because of their differences. Most of them actually betray one another quite often! (Cronus swallowed his children in fear of them replacing him, Zeus swallowed Athena's mother because he was mad at her, ect.) Why it's like a divine Game of Thrones! :lol: it's these constant betrayals and conflics that makes them more human, hencefourth more relateable to us. (Unlike the goodie two-shoes Christian God)to me, It gives me a genuine sense that we are the children if these Gods and Goddesses


_________________
Quote:
Never put off till tomorrow what you can do today

-Thomas Jefferson


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

06 May 2016, 9:28 am

Oh yeah.

The Greek Gods made the guests on Jerry Springer look tame with all of that intrigue, debauchery, adultery, and incest going on.

The God of the Old Testament took more interest in the morality of humans than did the Greek gods. But he was hardly "a goody two shoes" himself. He described himself as a "jealous god", and was quite vengeful. But he seems to have gotten better at anger management by the time of the New Testament (maybe the birth of his son calmed him down),and he became a pretty nice guy (though he got crazy again in Revelations).



pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

06 May 2016, 2:04 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Yep...."Faith"....that's the crux of it all.

Almost all beliefs are based on "faith."

Even atheistic ones.

Atheism is not a faith. We simply see no evidence of any god and therefore eschew any belief. This idea that atheism requires some kind of faith is silly and is made to call atheism a 'religion'. The reason people do this is to try and pull atheists into the gutter believers have found themselves in...



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

06 May 2016, 8:14 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Yep...."Faith"....that's the crux of it all.

Almost all beliefs are based on "faith."

Even atheistic ones.

Except the ones based on evidence.



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

06 May 2016, 10:14 pm

Luciferians and their lookalikes equate executive function to godhood, sometimes called self-realization.

In a manner of speaking, faith sometimes comes down to pattern recognition and positing that a choice must have been made, as in a logical progression.

Materialists call it the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which exists forever out of eyeshot.

But, faithful people call it the fixed point of reference.

To use an example from art --
If you had meant to draw shadows, or the edges of things, they might all converge upon an imaginary point on the canvas or paper. It was called drawing by "reference." You can see that everything is slanted in the same, general direction, even when there is no dot in the picture. Is it superstition or logic, to say that someone has made a choice.

In theory, what is visible might be considered the natural order.

If someone were to study your masterpiece, as by infrared, to see what lines and initial sketches you have made, that would be analogous to an invisible, higher order -- a window into the mind of the creator.



willc98
Butterfly
Butterfly

Joined: 10 Apr 2016
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 12

06 May 2016, 10:28 pm

As a Christian I want to apologize for all of the people who have spread hate or ignorance under the Christian banner that didn't come from the Bible or from love. I pray that you all will know the incredible love and glory that is in Jesus Christ. He's what this entire existence is all about. He is the beginning and the end. He's the prime star. He gets all the glory for all of eternity and the only One worth it.

We are "becoming" (changing, so when are we "we") while He is "I AM" (never changing).

If you really want to talk to some Christians with knowledge go to Reddit and to "Christians" (not "Christianity) and ask a question there or go to "debateachristian". Don't cherry pick easy targets. There's idiots under every banner of religion, politics, race, etc.. who will make your position seem better when you destroy them.

Most Christians I know believe in the big bang theory, micro-evolution, and have gay friends. Your sexual preference isn't what defines you as a human. Everyone at my church has sin and we are all trying to sin less with God's help but we would never not let someone in because of one sin. Everything everyone does is tainted with sin. You can't do a perfect action. If a woman had an abortion I would hope as a church we would love that woman as much as possible and get to know her and her situation a long time before pointing out any specific sin. Jesus wasn't like that. Christianity is about what Jesus said and did, not what His followers have said and do. And yet Jesus' own family and followers didn't really believe He was God until after the Resurrection! But once they saw Him alive after they watched him die that's what created the fame and faith of Jesus Christ who is God we know of today. It actually happened and the Bible is true.

Jesus chose sinful people over the religious people who knew the Bible. He went to the prostitutes and tax collectors! But then He taught them to repent and follow Him. To reject someone from the start isn't following Jesus.

But to seriously disbelieve in a Creator when you look outside at reality that's better than anything than we can create as humans is a bit silly to me. Like all this just came out of no where. I mean it's either one Creator or a bunch of them (or your brain is the one Creating and you are God). All I know is only One has contacted me and I'm surely not Creating all of this.

I love you all and wish I could do something to make you believe but I have nothing but my own experience and the Gospel to point you to. Ask God to reveal Himself to you if He is real and read a chapter of the Gospel of John or Romans and if nothing happens then eat drink and be merry and don't waste your time debating people on something you are sure you will never believe in :heart:


_________________
Born in 1982; diagnosed with Asperger's in 2012.


pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

07 May 2016, 10:27 am

friedmacguffins wrote:
Luciferians and their lookalikes equate executive function to godhood, sometimes called self-realization.

In a manner of speaking, faith sometimes comes down to pattern recognition and positing that a choice must have been made, as in a logical progression.

Materialists call it the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which exists forever out of eyeshot.

But, faithful people call it the fixed point of reference.

To use an example from art --
If you had meant to draw shadows, or the edges of things, they might all converge upon an imaginary point on the canvas or paper. It was called drawing by "reference." You can see that everything is slanted in the same, general direction, even when there is no dot in the picture. Is it superstition or logic, to say that someone has made a choice.

In theory, what is visible might be considered the natural order.

If someone were to study your masterpiece, as by infrared, to see what lines and initial sketches you have made, that would be analogous to an invisible, higher order -- a window into the mind of the creator.

So, if Luciferians equate executive function to godhood, we must be the devil...



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

07 May 2016, 12:53 pm

pcuser wrote:
So, if Luciferians equate executive function to godhood, we must be the devil...


In one manner of speaking, you either have a concept of self or are regarded as an animal. Some animals can stand upright, on their hindlegs.

The Luciferians regard themselves as being godlike, in comparison.

The reason why I bring this up, is that the concept of faith is like imagining intelligent design. The reality, surrounding you, seems logical, and not random. So, you're guessing that some discrete, conscious decision must have been made.

God is along the lines of the prime mover or first cause, to use abstract terms.

This is not exactly the same thing as fear of the unknown, but more like a hypothesis. The purpose of life is supposed to be along the lines of a test or proof, with a foregone conclusion.

I am not a formal teacher of Creationism, but the better ones know all the materialistic dating methods, anatomy, and eras of evolution. They are not willfully ignorant; it is a difference of opinion. Earlier, in the period of secular Enlightenment, when Christianity was still tolerated, both opinions were discussed, contemporaneously, in a free marketplace of ideas.



drlaugh
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Posts: 3,360

07 May 2016, 8:43 pm

Sometimes I find life baffling.

My wife complimented me a few months ago using a quote from a book.
"We will intuitively know how to handle situations which used to baffle us."
She said I was handling situations that use to baffle me. (Better not perfect)

I like reading Romans as well.


_________________
Still too old to know it all


ReticentJaeger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Feb 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,127

08 May 2016, 1:29 pm

TheSpectrum wrote:
I am of the belief that it isn't impossible for a species to reach Nicolas Cage-like levels of existence.


This thread is a lot funnier with my new 'G.o.d to Nicolas Cage' chrome extension.



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

09 May 2016, 7:36 am

willc98 wrote:
As a Christian I want to apologize for all of the people who have spread hate or ignorance under the Christian banner that didn't come from the Bible or from love. ...

What about the hate and ignorance that does come from the Bible or love?



drlaugh
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Posts: 3,360

09 May 2016, 8:12 am

God is Love, Patient and .......

more patient than me.

Love and prayers

Shalom, Brother harris


_________________
Still too old to know it all


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

09 May 2016, 9:17 am

willc98 wrote:
...Most Christians I know believe in the big bang theory, micro-evolution, and have gay friends....

Believing in "micro-evolution" and not actual evolution is willful ignorance.



Drone232
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 27
Location: Alabama

09 May 2016, 9:28 am

This is quite an interesting thread. I'd like to put in my own two cents, or more like three.
1. Someone on here asked why an omnipotent being would create vastly inferior creatures and world when they had all the power of the universe at their disposal. I found one answer while reading A Child's Work by Vivian Paley on the importance of children's fantasy play to learning and devlopment. At one point, the author and her fellow early childhood educators are reflecting on their own childhood fantasies and , for a moment, look at them from a religious perspective and come to the conclusion that "God must like stories". This was a profound statement for both the teachers and myself. It implied that an omnipotent being would create a self-unfolding universe for the sole purpose of watching it grow and develop, along with its sentiant races, into ever more complex and entertatining forms. I know of no no one that dislikes stories and so I see it as perfectly logical that God created evrrything as one great story filled with manifold smaller tales and adventures, good and bad, comedy and tragedy, and everything in between.
2. I see the true purpose of religion as being a voluntary egalitarian socialism that encourages people to help one another at whatever cost to themselves in an altruistic community. While this fits very few actual members of religions, it does fit a whole lot of the Catholic saints.
3. On the idea that Christianity is filled with hateful individuals and that the church is prejudiced. remember that most of the people that Jesus denounced were his own religious leaders whom he refered to as "vipers" and "sepulchres". In fact , most of Jesus' message is on the evils of the church and state authority and the good of a socialistic, altruistic community. Fight the Power! :mrgreen:
But to keep this post relevant to the topic at hand, doI find God baffling. Not really. He is all powerful and thus can do anything he deems necessary to keep the plotlines of reality on a steady path to their conclusion. He is the author and director of all so let us watch and see what happens on today's episode of life.


_________________
I am a traditional, non-Roman Catholic feminist married to a Bahá'í. Decide for yourself what that means.


pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

09 May 2016, 10:48 am

Drone232 wrote:
This is quite an interesting thread. I'd like to put in my own two cents, or more like three.
1. Someone on here asked why an omnipotent being would create vastly inferior creatures and world when they had all the power of the universe at their disposal. I found one answer while reading A Child's Work by Vivian Paley on the importance of children's fantasy play to learning and devlopment. At one point, the author and her fellow early childhood educators are reflecting on their own childhood fantasies and , for a moment, look at them from a religious perspective and come to the conclusion that "God must like stories". This was a profound statement for both the teachers and myself. It implied that an omnipotent being would create a self-unfolding universe for the sole purpose of watching it grow and develop, along with its sentiant races, into ever more complex and entertatining forms. I know of no no one that dislikes stories and so I see it as perfectly logical that God created evrrything as one great story filled with manifold smaller tales and adventures, good and bad, comedy and tragedy, and everything in between.
2. I see the true purpose of religion as being a voluntary egalitarian socialism that encourages people to help one another at whatever cost to themselves in an altruistic community. While this fits very few actual members of religions, it does fit a whole lot of the Catholic saints.
3. On the idea that Christianity is filled with hateful individuals and that the church is prejudiced. remember that most of the people that Jesus denounced were his own religious leaders whom he refered to as "vipers" and "sepulchres". In fact , most of Jesus' message is on the evils of the church and state authority and the good of a socialistic, altruistic community. Fight the Power! :mrgreen:
But to keep this post relevant to the topic at hand, doI find God baffling. Not really. He is all powerful and thus can do anything he deems necessary to keep the plotlines of reality on a steady path to their conclusion. He is the author and director of all so let us watch and see what happens on today's episode of life.

Let's look at all three of your points. If I was a God, I would want other equals to spend time with, not a mess of inferiors. The idea of an all powerful being needing affirmation from a bunch of inferiors sounds rather petty and insecure. If that God wanted stories, I would think equals would spin far better stories than fearful mortals. As to your second point, since most people don't fit your definition of what a religion is good for, I submit that religion has failed miserably as you seem to agree with the exception of the few Catholic saints. Even Jesus isn't followed as he preached taking care of those less fortunate than yourselves. Jesus as portrayed in the Gospels is all about fighting authority as found in the Church and elsewhere. As to your third statement, it is fairly well attached to the second one and pretty well answered by what I wrote. However, for a Jesus to come along and attack his own Church, perhaps he as the all powerful entity he is claimed to be would simply begin with a better group of believers or correct their beliefs about this religion. In any case, religion is a pretty poor idea settled upon by men in the superstitious bronze age, thus making God a strange idea from the outset. No wonder why we see it as a strange or baffling idea...