What would demons be?
Iamaparakeet wrote:
I don't think being convicted in earthly courts means anything, since they let actual murderers walk free, sentence the innocent to death, and so much else to prove that "Justice" isn't blind but either cares only for money while it's looking at its scales to see who gave the least gold or is just plain stupid and doesn't care about truth and right and wrong but only cares about arbitrarily enforcing gibberish which human lawmakers fished out of their toilets and letting murderers and rapists walk free on "technicalities" while innocent people get falsely convicted of murder only to be proven innocent years after they've been murdered by the "justice" system.
And celestial courts do better?
Exodus 11:5 wrote:
And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts.
Exodus 12:29 wrote:
And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.
Sources (KJV):
http://biblehub.com/exodus/11-5.htm
http://biblehub.com/exodus/12-29.htm
Not exactly big on 5th and 8th Amendment protections, eh?
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,639
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Iamaparakeet wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Iamaparakeet wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Iamaparakeet wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
One side point - the thing about demons only being exorcisable by Christ or by the name of Christ, I don't know how to break this but that's something of a rumor. There are a lot of people from far eastern religions who can do it, lots of practicing neoplatonists and neopagans can, also a lot of dedicated ceremonial magicians can do the same.
I don't know what my take is on overshadowing/obsession/possession is as to whether or not it's a subconscious data glitch, whether it's psychology being beat with psychology or not, but I am familiar with particular Hermetic practitioners being called by Catholic and Lutheran diocese at times - largely because of how few priests really believe in that stuff let alone have the experience or wherewithal to do so.
I don't know what my take is on overshadowing/obsession/possession is as to whether or not it's a subconscious data glitch, whether it's psychology being beat with psychology or not, but I am familiar with particular Hermetic practitioners being called by Catholic and Lutheran diocese at times - largely because of how few priests really believe in that stuff let alone have the experience or wherewithal to do so.
Perhaps in many cases it is just psychological or sociological in nature, but not the ones with levitation, superhuman strength, telekinesis, speaking in languages the possessed person doesn't know, etc. I would guess that demons probably play along with the beliefs of those around them, particularly ones that benefit them by encouraging sins - like praying to dead people such as saints, praying to false gods, or chanting, which are all sins according to Levitical law, and so they add to and encourage the sins of those around them to help drag them down further.
Chanting?
I can't find the reference, but I remember reading it specifically in either Leviticus or Deuteronomy, but also Christ said not to pray like the hypocrites who think God will hear them due to their repetitions.
I take Christ's saying that we should not pray like the hypocrites to be more along the line of making a big public show in which the one doing the praying, rather than God, is receiving all the attention. Chanting, on the other hand, is a communal act in the worship of God.
In regard to your previous post, concerning the movie The Exorcism Of Emily Rose: While it was " based" on a true story, the fact is, the priests who conducted the exorcism had been convicted and imprisoned, after the poor girl who they had tortured for weeks to get the Devil out of her died of gangrene. That's something the movie never cared to mention.
I kind of what thinking more of them chanting prayers like this:
"Exorcizamus te, omnis immundus spiritus
omnis satanica potestas, omnis incursio
infernalis adversarii, omnis legio,
omnis congregatio et secta diabolica.
Ergo draco maledicte
et omnis legio diabolica
adjuramus te.
Cessa decipere humanas creaturas,
eisque aeternae Perditionis venenum propinare.
Vade, Satana, inventor et magister
omnis fallaciae, hostis humanae salutis.
Humiliare sub potenti manu dei,
contremisce et effuge, invocato a
nobis sancto et terribili nomine,
quem inferi tremunt.
Ab insidiis diaboli, libera nos, Domine.
Ut Ecclesiam tuam secura tibi facias libertate servire
te rogamus, audi nos.
Ut inimicos sanctae Ecclesiae humiliare digneris,
te rogamus, audi nos.
Terribilis Deus de sanctuario suo.
Deus Israhel ipse truderit virtutem
et fortitudinem plebi Suae.
Benedictus Deus. Gloria Patri."
But as far as worship songs and stuff go, to the pure all things are pure. I don't think being convicted in earthly courts means anything, since they let actual murderers walk free, sentence the innocent to death, and so much else to prove that "Justice" isn't blind but either cares only for money while it's looking at its scales to see who gave the least gold or is just plain stupid and doesn't care about truth and right and wrong but only cares about arbitrarily enforcing gibberish which human lawmakers fished out of their toilets and letting murderers and rapists walk free on "technicalities" while innocent people get falsely convicted of murder only to be proven innocent years after they've been murdered by the "justice" system. I don't know all the details of Michel's case, but I know how naturalism is presumed true and so any thought to the contrary would be ignored. I also know that Jackie and I gave each other our lifelong vows, neither of us have ever had sex outside of marriage, and as per Christ in Mark 10:1-12 we are still married and if we married anyone else it would be considered adultery regardless of whatever human courts pretend to say is "okay", since all authority comes from Christ, they are not able to validly say anything in opposition to His will regardless of whatever they would presume to say in contradiction to the will of God.
In the real incident the movie was based on, I think the priests and parents were guilty, as their actions had led directly to the girl's death. The only problem was, no one got more than a few years, if I am remembering the sentences handed down by the court correctly.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,526
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
Iamaparakeet wrote:
LOL Okay, now that is just funny. In Job the term "Satan" is used for the devil, which literally means "accuser" or "prosecuting lawyer". The first mention of the devil is of course in Genesis 3 where he does that tempting of Eve (Hebrew Chavah), in which the fence of "don't even touch" is what is thrown out because the actual command is "do not eat", not don't touch, and the "you won't die" is practically followed by a silent "right away". Really, a used car salesmen, lawyer, banker selling loans, or any other profession which requires lying professionally fits the bill probably. Of course, there's no such things as ghosts and demons are fallen angels, but if the chicken and egg problem were reversed it would be like what you said. However, as Christ said, satan is the father of all liars.
I get that you wouldn't touch this one with a ten foot pole due to your convictions so I'll throw the below out in general.
From the sound of people's experiences - near death experiences, astral travel experiences, those who do pathworkings on the Kabbalistic Tree of Life (or Jacob's ladder, whatever one wants to call it), those who try using John Dee and Edward Kelly's Enochian tablet systems, as well as those who do theurgy (ie. calling down one of the four archangels or the egyptian and greek gods/goddesses for guidance), also those outside and beyond the catholic church who end up performing exorcisms or cleansing of places either after someone has been harassed or after a magical operation has gone wrong in some significant manner - the overall theory of the universe sounds the same.
The structure seems to behave in a panentheistic-monist manner. Nothing's really separate from God and the discussion of angels, divas, elemental beings, larvae, daemons, etc.. is something more like the taxonomy of different species of sentience that most of us really can't reach out and touch or examine (albeit something like a larvae would be a thoughtform - something human generated that's closer to a vampiric bit of malware than having any consciousness of its own). I know people hate like heck to see the words quantum and consciousness anywhere near each other but there really aren't too many other realms that you can pin non-corporeal consciousness to and these are a bit like describing conscious agencies that weave together to give us the world that we experience on a daily basis. While it's not impossible that it's something completely other than the QM dynamic it's definitely something of a very similar style of behavior.
One of the better books I've read that deals with a swath of history both between the mystics of the Catholic church and the French esotericists of the 18th and 19th centuries and weaves all of the common experiences together is Mediations on the Tarot (post mortem release by the now-not-so-Unknown Author). What's really described here, and described by a lot of people, is that when mystics from various religions compare notes they generally seem to come up with the same things regarding the basis of reality. It could be, if it's a reducive materialist's universe, that they're all fiddling around with human nervous systems and thus experiencing the same limbic artifacts, or it could be because examining these things first hand yields a coherent reality in the middle that doesn't necessarily agree with any of the big five dogmas precisely. Within that, rarely-to-never is it an Augustine-style grid iron face off between Adam Kadmon or the Solar Logos (whatever supreme being that has taken the role of greeting people as Jesus) vs. a force of evil out to condemn souls to eternal torment.
One of the things about Socrates that people forget, and which I'm sure Christopher Hitchens never would have mentioned in discussing his contributions to our present culture, was Socrates's daemon which he insisted guided him in his discoveries and went away weeping when he decided that he'd rather drink the hemlock than capitulate to a false allegation.
As for finding any kind of actual Ha Satan there seems to really be no place to find it. God seems to have both light and dark aspects, and those sides that tested and tried both Jesus and Buddha are the tests and trials that seems to be of the variety that seem to be applied medicinally to fortify a person's integrity if they're being called to a ministry of world-changing proportions. Looking at it symbolically, as all of these things typically need, it's a showdown with one's own lower nature and the specific aspects of its needs that conflict with our higher needs and ideals.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
GGPViper wrote:
Iamaparakeet wrote:
I don't think being convicted in earthly courts means anything, since they let actual murderers walk free, sentence the innocent to death, and so much else to prove that "Justice" isn't blind but either cares only for money while it's looking at its scales to see who gave the least gold or is just plain stupid and doesn't care about truth and right and wrong but only cares about arbitrarily enforcing gibberish which human lawmakers fished out of their toilets and letting murderers and rapists walk free on "technicalities" while innocent people get falsely convicted of murder only to be proven innocent years after they've been murdered by the "justice" system.
And celestial courts do better?
Exodus 11:5 wrote:
And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts.
Exodus 12:29 wrote:
And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.
Sources (KJV):
http://biblehub.com/exodus/11-5.htm
http://biblehub.com/exodus/12-29.htm
Not exactly big on 5th and 8th Amendment protections, eh?
If we have a right to kill animals either on the basis of our being greater than them or by permission from God in Genesis 9 and a verse in Mark which allows for unclean food to be eaten, then such as shown that humans do to animals in From Farm To Fridge, angels and God being beings greater than us and with our worth in being that we are made in God's image and our lives belong to Him and not to us, then He'd have the right to say who lives and dies. Humans value life on the basis of whether they know the lives of the creatures in questions, valuing friends' lives above strangers' lives even though both are worth the same, and killing babies in the womb even though it's the same baby they're murdering regardless of whether visible when murdered or not. Abortion is murder, because it's taking a life made in God's image. Suicide is murder because it's taking a life made in God's image. If God didn't give permission to kill and eat animals, it would then be sin just as it was before the Flood. God is the only one who has authority to smite to give permission to smite to angels or demons.
_________________
I'm an author: https://www.amazon.com/author/benfournier
Sub to my YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/Iamnotaparakeet
"In the kingdom of hope, there is no winter."
Kraichgauer wrote:
Iamaparakeet wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Iamaparakeet wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Iamaparakeet wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
One side point - the thing about demons only being exorcisable by Christ or by the name of Christ, I don't know how to break this but that's something of a rumor. There are a lot of people from far eastern religions who can do it, lots of practicing neoplatonists and neopagans can, also a lot of dedicated ceremonial magicians can do the same.
I don't know what my take is on overshadowing/obsession/possession is as to whether or not it's a subconscious data glitch, whether it's psychology being beat with psychology or not, but I am familiar with particular Hermetic practitioners being called by Catholic and Lutheran diocese at times - largely because of how few priests really believe in that stuff let alone have the experience or wherewithal to do so.
I don't know what my take is on overshadowing/obsession/possession is as to whether or not it's a subconscious data glitch, whether it's psychology being beat with psychology or not, but I am familiar with particular Hermetic practitioners being called by Catholic and Lutheran diocese at times - largely because of how few priests really believe in that stuff let alone have the experience or wherewithal to do so.
Perhaps in many cases it is just psychological or sociological in nature, but not the ones with levitation, superhuman strength, telekinesis, speaking in languages the possessed person doesn't know, etc. I would guess that demons probably play along with the beliefs of those around them, particularly ones that benefit them by encouraging sins - like praying to dead people such as saints, praying to false gods, or chanting, which are all sins according to Levitical law, and so they add to and encourage the sins of those around them to help drag them down further.
Chanting?
I can't find the reference, but I remember reading it specifically in either Leviticus or Deuteronomy, but also Christ said not to pray like the hypocrites who think God will hear them due to their repetitions.
I take Christ's saying that we should not pray like the hypocrites to be more along the line of making a big public show in which the one doing the praying, rather than God, is receiving all the attention. Chanting, on the other hand, is a communal act in the worship of God.
In regard to your previous post, concerning the movie The Exorcism Of Emily Rose: While it was " based" on a true story, the fact is, the priests who conducted the exorcism had been convicted and imprisoned, after the poor girl who they had tortured for weeks to get the Devil out of her died of gangrene. That's something the movie never cared to mention.
I kind of what thinking more of them chanting prayers like this:
"Exorcizamus te, omnis immundus spiritus
omnis satanica potestas, omnis incursio
infernalis adversarii, omnis legio,
omnis congregatio et secta diabolica.
Ergo draco maledicte
et omnis legio diabolica
adjuramus te.
Cessa decipere humanas creaturas,
eisque aeternae Perditionis venenum propinare.
Vade, Satana, inventor et magister
omnis fallaciae, hostis humanae salutis.
Humiliare sub potenti manu dei,
contremisce et effuge, invocato a
nobis sancto et terribili nomine,
quem inferi tremunt.
Ab insidiis diaboli, libera nos, Domine.
Ut Ecclesiam tuam secura tibi facias libertate servire
te rogamus, audi nos.
Ut inimicos sanctae Ecclesiae humiliare digneris,
te rogamus, audi nos.
Terribilis Deus de sanctuario suo.
Deus Israhel ipse truderit virtutem
et fortitudinem plebi Suae.
Benedictus Deus. Gloria Patri."
But as far as worship songs and stuff go, to the pure all things are pure. I don't think being convicted in earthly courts means anything, since they let actual murderers walk free, sentence the innocent to death, and so much else to prove that "Justice" isn't blind but either cares only for money while it's looking at its scales to see who gave the least gold or is just plain stupid and doesn't care about truth and right and wrong but only cares about arbitrarily enforcing gibberish which human lawmakers fished out of their toilets and letting murderers and rapists walk free on "technicalities" while innocent people get falsely convicted of murder only to be proven innocent years after they've been murdered by the "justice" system. I don't know all the details of Michel's case, but I know how naturalism is presumed true and so any thought to the contrary would be ignored. I also know that Jackie and I gave each other our lifelong vows, neither of us have ever had sex outside of marriage, and as per Christ in Mark 10:1-12 we are still married and if we married anyone else it would be considered adultery regardless of whatever human courts pretend to say is "okay", since all authority comes from Christ, they are not able to validly say anything in opposition to His will regardless of whatever they would presume to say in contradiction to the will of God.
In the real incident the movie was based on, I think the priests and parents were guilty, as their actions had led directly to the girl's death. The only problem was, no one got more than a few years, if I am remembering the sentences handed down by the court correctly.
In the real incident Annelise Michel also claimed to have Hitler as a demon, so it probably was mental illness. Though I wouldn't be surprised if Hitler were demon possessed like the antichrist will be.
_________________
I'm an author: https://www.amazon.com/author/benfournier
Sub to my YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/Iamnotaparakeet
"In the kingdom of hope, there is no winter."