E-mail server thing looks bad for Hillary

Post Reply New Topic

We recently had a president who tortured people, which I always thought was a crime. And he's still free. So, have some perspective, are we going to take down a possible future president for improper use of e-mail?

What I wanna know is, How is the State Department going to sanction someone who doesn't work for them anymore?

No worries... Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, will now delve deeper into this case with the same impeccable professionalism that he demonstrated in the Planned Parenthood investigation...

This looks bad:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hi ... .html?_r=0

Because Hillary used her BlackBerry within the territories of our adversaries, foreign governments have probably already hacked her phone. Hillary didn't have a cybersecurity professional monitor her private server, so it was probably already hacked by dedicated state-sponsored hackers.

The latest Gallup Poll of U.S. political party affiliation for 2016 shows that 28 percent of voters are Republicans, 31 percent are Democrats and 39 percent are unaffiliated (independent) voters.

The unaffiliated voters hold a controlling plurality of the votes at this time. Given that they are, in fact, unlikely to vote for either major political party (and might, instead, avoid voting), seemingly viable third-party candidates (like Libertarian nominees Gary Johnson and William Weld) could force a three-way election. If that happens, these unaffiliated voters along with a relative few partisans of both major parties could upset expectations.

In light of this, I agree that the ongoing Clinton saga won't let up and no longer requires an indictment by her former employers within the federal government. This fact doesn't meant that Trump will coast to an easy victory. Again, watch the unaffiliated voters. They will likely control the outcome of the election more than anyone or anything else.

I also expect a few additional unaffiliated voters after both party conventions when Americans who aren't addicted to the cult of personality see the candidates in prime time. It is going to get a lot rougher.

Trump will win independent voters, he already leads them significantly over Hillary who is hated by independents

no third party candidate is going to poll well enough to get in the debates and those debates will be highest rated ever. People will naturally gravitate to one of the two candidates since it is a very polarizing election and people do not like to vote for losers. Third party candidates always over poll when they include them, I don't think Gary Johnson or Jill Stein get over 5%. There will be unprecedented media coverage, nobody is going to be talking third party. Wake me when someone hits 16% or whatever in the polls

They use to put Ron Paul in third party polls sometimes and he'd get like 8-11%, it's just natural for these polls.

President Trump should hold all the criminal politicians accountable, this isn't over for Hillary she's running for her freedom

you're an easy mark believing media horses**t

i veteran of the bs msm media smear campaign as they did it to Ron Paul too

real guilty people playing wag the dog

Independents are more often than not conservative regardless of age. Otherwise those youngsters would be Dems, Libs, or Green Party.

I can't guess in every state, but Arizona, my home state, has 3 and change million registered voters. 1mil+ are GOP and 1 mil+ are Independent ( a schism that came because John McLame I would theorize in the cause and effect dept. Most my freinds that are 'I" do not want ta party to count on their vote and are all former republicans. I join them again soon ). Only a small percent are ethnic minorities.
And in contested year only 800k of the last mil were Dems. The rest are Libertarians and a few others.

To turn off the average Independent in Texas, AZ or NC at least; Trump would need more policy gaffes, not social ones.

Anyone else would have been charged, they've made it very clear that lack of intent is not a defense to this type of charge, and people have gone to jail for less.

Gosh, where are all the people who usually scream about "rich white privilege"?