Why cops cannot be trusted

Page 3 of 4 [ 55 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,911
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

11 Dec 2016, 10:54 pm

Last time I dealt with cops, they were doing a suicide check on a room-mate, apparently he texted his girlfriend something that worried her he'd commit suicide and she called them. Due to some other stuff we had to kick this room-mate out but he's still here for this month.

But yeah, they didn't do anything beyond check on that guy....they even said they didn't care if we were smoking pot or anything and were only there to check on them. It was annoying at 1:00 in the morning but that is about it(aside from me and my boyfriend were trying to have sex when they knocked, talk about buzz killer)...granted I know simular encounters have probably ended worse but I guess we were lucky to get reasonable cops sent. They just talked to the guy, and had to take him to the hospital due to protocol, didn't tamper with anything or try to search our stuff or anything.

_________________
We won't go back.

Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,911
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

11 Dec 2016, 11:13 pm

madbutnotmad wrote:

h their satanic court system.

I believe that some of the police are satanic. Although it is questionable as to whether the entire system is satanic.

I would say that like most areas or systems that have power of any form over people, people who enjoy power over others and who enjoy abusing power will be drawn to these systems of power, some who may also prescribe to delusional beliefs or at the very least practice ritualistic victimization on individuals motivated by personal sadistic and egotistical tendencies or by prescribing to delusional beliefs in systems of magick in their search for attaining power and material gain. Such behaviours are sometimes shared by groups of people, who may superimpose their system of beliefs over another system (such as the legal system) so as to achieve their objectives or at the least maintain their delusional beliefs or again, to exploit the people and world around them in a material sense.

Although i am not a hater of Freemasonry, i know that some police belong to Freemasonry lodges. This may explain why some of the police use certain dates to send people to court. There is a pattern.
I have experienced this myself, where i previously was wrongfully arrested by a bent policeman.

All my meetings and court dates landed on what i would call days that bore magickal significant to people who practiced ritual magick (if not delusionally) or at the very least, were following a system of ritual magick.
Days such as Friday the 13th, or the 9th of the 11th, or on full moons, or on a significant day of celebration such as a birth day, an anniversary or halloween etc.

If i accused the police of being satanists they would all laugh in my face or do something even more nasty.
But i would speculate that its not just the police. It is possible that it goes deeper than this.

I read that the telephone number in the US was chosen as 911 for a reason. So as the telephone traditionally in the UK, which is 999.
People who study numerology can see it a mile off as well as aspo's who have the "spotting patterns" trait of Autism. Why do "normal" people not see them?

And where exactly are you getting your information about satanism...?

_________________
We won't go back.

ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

12 Dec 2016, 11:38 am

auntblabby wrote:

ZenDen wrote:

I guess they were "profiling" you. Good for them. I'd rather see thousands harassed than hundreds die. Profiling works; not 100% of the time, obviously, but you have to use the tools you have in situations such as this; there's no time for a long, drawn-out investigation at an airport, and police don't receive comprehensive training.
In your experience...is Vancouver the worst you've encountered? Sorry you had to be inconvenienced. I hope they were at least courteous.

Vancouver was the worst. one of them [security people] was honest with me and said my body language said i looked like I had something to hide, like obviously i'm a terrorist. :roll:

i got sick of that and determined to never EVER fly again.

So please tell us: Were you wearing a large long dark trench coat and covering bulky items beneath it as you tried to protect them from inclement weather and damage on your trip?

I can't imagine too much else that would trigger these otherwise dull public servants, unless you were "the wrong color" or something similar they like to fixate on?

ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

12 Dec 2016, 11:41 am

Misslizard wrote:

auntblabby wrote:

ZenDen wrote:

Vancouver was the worst. one of them [security people] was honest with me and said my body language said i looked like I had something to hide, like obviously i'm a terrorist. :roll:

i got sick of that and determined to never EVER fly again.

My son always gets pulled asides and frisked.He hates flying and his anxiety is obvious.He looks like a cop lol,so with him,it's the the way he is projecting himself and not his physical appearance.

He "looks" like a cop? Can you be more descriptive?

ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

12 Dec 2016, 11:56 am

Ban-Dodger wrote:

Police Officers of ANY country/nation/corporation need to instead be replaced with unarmed Peace Officers. Period. A conversion of Armed Police Officers who work as Mercenary Heavies for an Insane Politicial/Judicial System instead into Unarmed Peace Officers who work for their Communities is the best Alternative.

Fogman wrote:

As far as the initial post of this thread is concerned, would you prefer that we replace American cops with cops from some other country such as, say, Mexico, Brazil, or perhaps even El Salvador, or maybe Cameroon? --Be glad they are only American cops, because the alternatives can be a LOT worse.

Your idea (using police as outreach for a community) would be soooo great. The only problem is all of the problems involved. You don't talk about solutions allowing this dream to happen.

Problems? When I lived in Chicago there were neighborhoods the police didn't want to enter (pesky people were always shooting at them from the high-rise tenements). How would you go about making this a safe place for police to live in...let alone how to police the residents?

Dreams are great though. We all need something better to ascribe to.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,481
Location: Aux Arcs

12 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm

ZenDen wrote:

Misslizard wrote:

auntblabby wrote:

ZenDen wrote:

Vancouver was the worst. one of them [security people] was honest with me and said my body language said i looked like I had something to hide, like obviously i'm a terrorist. :roll:

i got sick of that and determined to never EVER fly again.

My son always gets pulled asides and frisked.He hates flying and his anxiety is obvious.He looks like a cop lol,so with him,it's the the way he is projecting himself and not his physical appearance.

He "looks" like a cop? Can you be more descriptive?

Lol,He looks like the cops around here.He wears his hair the same way extremely short,well groomed and clean shaven.Around six ft 200 lbs,physicaly fit.I guess a better term would be "straight laced" looking.Others here have remarked about it.

_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi

mauloch_baal
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 24 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 60

12 Dec 2016, 1:09 pm

ZenDen wrote:

Ban-Dodger wrote:

They are trained to lie to you.

They commit felonies on a daily basis.

The only reason they talk to you is to 'find' some reason to assault you with their satanic court system.

Here are a handful of violations that they commit each and every single day:

18 U.S.C. § 1201: Kidnapping (this is applicable the MOMENT you are handcuffed)
18 U.S. Code § 1593A: Trafficking in persons (this is applicable when they drive you to a jail or prison)
18 U.S.C. § 1203: Hostage taking (this is applicable when they lock you up into the box)
10 U.S. Code § 927 - Art. 127.: Extortion (this is applicable when they require you to pay $ for your release)
15 U.S. Code § 80a–36: Embezzlement (the Jail/Prison Bonds fund the wages of these mercenaries)
18 U.S.C. § 4: Misprison of Felony (locking you up without trial before there is even so much as a hearing)
18 U.S.C. § 2382: Misprison of Treason (applicable when you tell them the law and they violate it anyway)
18 U.S.C. § 242: Deprivation of rights under Color of Law (applicable when you have caused no harm)
18 U.S.C. § 1028: Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information (applicable to when they obtain your picture, fingerprints, dna, semen, cum, saliva, blood, hair, ANYTHING from your physical body for that matter)
18 U.S.C. § 1512: Tampering with Witness, Victim, Or An Informant (applicable when they badger you, coerce you into giving any form of identification or documentation, interference with your life, etc)
28 U.S.C. § 1359: Collusion (police are always the biggest criminal mafia gang in town running organised departments of tyranny and oppression)

...just to name a small handful of the satanic activities that they engage in every single day.

I don't think much about your interpretation of the law...that part's nonsensical.

But your video puts the blame exactly where it belongs...in the laps of the "American" method of politics.

Democrat and Republican government officials, both elected and appointed have been at the root of our ongoing shame.

Is it any wonder voters rejected the same-old-same-old methods these filthy politicians use to insure their prosperity?

Bernie Sanders was the best candidate by far, and voting for Hillary would be bombing poor people over-and-over. But we didn't get that choice because of under-handed dirty dealing from the Hillary camp...her usual form of business.

No one knows what Trump's election will bring....but you can be sure the old time filthy politicians will be pushing for more conflict to profit themselves. And obama is obviously intent on creating as much conflict as he can. Although many of Trump's cabinet choices only seem aimed toward U.S. financial strength, at least many of the war mongers of the last presidential cycle will be out on their ass, probably saving many thousands of lives.

I disagree about Bernie on the basis that he is a self avowed Socialist, many nations have tried Socialism and it has not worked. Given the options though there were not any good choices. Bernie did at least seem honest, but Hillary and Trump I don't trust. Hillary seems unstable, and Trump will lie cheat and steal to get what he wants. In the end I voted for Trump. We have not had a good candidate in a long long time though.

Just to be clear Trump is not a good candidate.

0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

12 Dec 2016, 5:14 pm

Talking about unarmed police UK has mostly unarmed police.

Contrary to popular belief this has little to do with gun regulation, in fact it predates gun regulation by over 100years. It is to do with the french revolutions. at the time of the formation of the Metropolitan Police, which was the first modern police force. Predating the police was a form of neighborhood watch. Citizens would only agree to a national police force, if they were not routinely armed. This was due to the reputation the Paris police force had of putting down decent.

All of the country forces and the met itself have the option to arm as they wish, it is down to the Chief Constable of the Constabulary. Some do more than others. However they know it will not go down well if it was routine. Armed officer tend to work more as a response unit equivalent to SWAT.

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,561
Location: the island of defective toy santas

13 Dec 2016, 2:36 am

ZenDen wrote:

So please tell us: Were you wearing a large long dark trench coat and covering bulky items beneath it as you tried to protect them from inclement weather and damage on your trip? I can't imagine too much else that would trigger these otherwise dull public servants, unless you were "the wrong color" or something similar they like to fixate on?

red net tank top, blue trousers, gray camera bag. they mentioned my body language and not my clothing.

ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

13 Dec 2016, 12:47 pm

auntblabby wrote:

ZenDen wrote:

So please tell us: Were you wearing a large long dark trench coat and covering bulky items beneath it as you tried to protect them from inclement weather and damage on your trip? I can't imagine too much else that would trigger these otherwise dull public servants, unless you were "the wrong color" or something similar they like to fixate on?

red net tank top, blue trousers, gray camera bag. they mentioned my body language and not my clothing.

...They mentioned...? And how do you know they were telling you the truth? Their job is to be secretive...not tell the truth. But you can show they were right in their suspicions by telling us (in the strictest confidence) what you were doing with your body to make them suspicious:

Perhaps you were hiding out in the corner of some bathroom where their secret cameras couldn't see you?
Or perhaps you were near an entrance where you could secretly watch for others?
Or perhaps you were nervously looking at your watch (they catch so many terrorists with that one).
Or perhaps you were performing back-flips or something of that suspicious nature?

If all of these (or similar actions) is reason to stop and search all terrorist types why haven't they caught anyone using these fascist terror tactics? Their phony (impossible to disprove) excuses are just that; probably have to turn in a sheet every day showing how many terrorists they harassed on a daily basis to show their loyalty and keep their job.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,481
Location: Aux Arcs

13 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm

They check out single males more often than males in family groups.
A friend spent some time camping in Canada and of course he looked scruffy when he went to cross the border back into the US,hadn't shaved in a month.They went through his truck and personal items with a fine tooth comb.

_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi

Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

13 Dec 2016, 1:39 pm

Ban-Dodger wrote:

I agree that the POs should be working for their communities, vs. the political system----but, UNarming them is ludicrous, IMO, because the citizenry is armed; and, if you criminalize guns (un-arm the citizens), criminals will still have guns, and they're the only ones (generally speaking) POs need to be armed, against.

_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)

Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

13 Dec 2016, 1:40 pm

ZenDen wrote:

auntblabby wrote:

Vancouver was the worst. one of them [security people] was honest with me and said my body language said i looked like I had something to hide, like obviously i'm a terrorist. i got sick of that and determined to never EVER fly again.

So please tell us: Were you wearing a large long dark trench coat and covering bulky items beneath... I can't imagine too much else that would trigger these otherwise dull public servants...

I'm thinking, maybe, AB met their eyes and looked down again (as alot of Aspies would, because of the not liking eye contact), and that would look like he was hoping to avoid security.

lordoflegions
Raven
Raven

Joined: 16 Nov 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 113

13 Dec 2016, 5:03 pm

Misslizard wrote:

Some are jerks,some are outstanding civil servants.
I saw a photo on the news of an officer wading through floodwater past waist deep,carrying a small elderly woman on his back.Risked his life to save her from drowning in a car.
So if you have a crazed naked tweaker pounding on your door,or worse,climbing in your window at three in the morning,who you gonna call?

Gonna call on the powers of my baseball bat and .357 magnum. It is legal to attack a rapist if they break into your home.
One time someone tried to bust down my door and I called the cops. Cops took 45 minutes to arrive.
Luckily nothing bad went down. But if there is some naked guy breaking INSIDE my home he is obviously on drugs and dangerous. And I will have it on my phone mic telling him to back down so if he refuses to comply I don't go to jail for manslaughter.

_________________
I am mad.

Ban-Dodger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Age: 1026
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,820
Location: Возможно в будущее к Россию идти... можеть быть...

12 Jan 2017, 11:28 pm

The first rule of order is to have a system in place that is designed for a «calming re-education/rehabilitation» of those who are disturbing the Peace of the Land so that there would not be inspiration for anybody to want to attack the Peace-Officers. A Peace-Officer (rather than "Police" Officer = Policy EnForcer) would not be «seen» as a «threat» to those being disruptive as a Peace-Officer is only bringing them to a Three-Hour Feeling Easier Seminar to help Offenders (i.e. : Perceived Criminals) calm down and to learn why it is bad to harm others then be released on the same day, unlike Police-Officers who are «threatening» to Rights/Liberties/Freedoms due to the fact that Police have a role that's been subverted into «punishment» against «sinners» instead of trying to help the «offenders» in a benign manner to try to get over their mental/emotional-traumas that are causing them to Disturb the Peace of the Land in some way, and it would ONLY be «REAL» crimes that require such Offenders to be brought in for Counselling (rather than the currently primary role of Police which is to generate revenue for everyone's slave-masters, such as the road-tax that is already much-more-than-covered by fuel-excise, that have absolutely nothing to do with the «Safety» of the public).

Everybody would respect the men/women in society who never cause harm to others, but are only around to help everyone overcome their desires to inflict any kind of abuse/harm/trauma/injury/suffering/etc. against others, and as a Peace-Officer would not seek to do ANY harm upon an Offender, then Offenders would have no reason to want to bring harm upon such service-people. Call it the Ancient-Doctrine of Karma if you will but phrases and statements like All Reap What They Sow, What Goes Around Comes Around, For Every Action There is an Equal and Opposite Reaction, Pay-Back's a b***h, etc., are well-known, and for good reason, and sub-consciously you all know that this «Reaping Force» IS a Reality, for many of you WILL be able to think back, and connect any «harm» that you have done unto others in your life with the SAME kind of experience that you may have caused others in an earlier part of your life (even if it is something like being made to lose $1000 or $1000 worth of stuff in your adult-life for possibly having stolen $1000 from parents/guardians during your teenage-years, but this Karma thing also applies to your Servants, and so there are those who have become homeless perhaps as a result of voting for and funding and being complicit to war-fare such as the invasion of Iraq where every civilian in Baghdad was dispossessed of their homes due to being «terrorised» by U.S. Military Weapons of Mass-Destruction).

ZenDen wrote:

Problems? When I lived in Chicago there were neighborhoods the police didn't want to enter (pesky people were always shooting at them from the high-rise tenements). How would you go about making this a safe place for police to live in...let alone how to police the residents?

Dreams are great though. We all need something better to ascribe to.

_________________
Pay me for my signature. 私の署名ですか❓お前の買うなければなりません。Mon autographe nécessite un paiement. Которые хочет мою автографу, у тебя нужно есть деньги сюда. Bezahlst du mich, wenn du meine Unterschrift wollen.

Aaendi
Deinonychus

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 363

13 Jan 2017, 12:43 am

Ban-Dodger wrote:

Couldn't agree more.

Page 3 of 4 [ 55 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Jump to:

Why cops cannot be trusted Post Reply New Topic

Why cops cannot be trusted