Creationists: This is your chance to prove yourselves.
I have a confession to make. In the past, I've been a tad harsh towards creationists ... maybe.
In this thread, I am going to give the creationists a chance to prove themselves. If the creationists want to be taken seriously, there are many questions that they must answer.
1. Human chromosome 2 looks suspiciously like a fusion of chimpanzee chromosome 2p and chimpanzee chromosome 2q.
Is this just a coincidence? Did God make it look that way? Why would he do that?
2. Explain the existence of dinosaur/bird creatures such as Archaeopteryx/Microraptor/Yi qi/Anchiornis/Icthyornis/Hesperornis/Confuciusornis. What are they? If birds are not descendants of dinosaurs, why did God put the bones of dino/bird creatures underground?
3. Explain creatures like Icthyostega/Acanthostega/Pederpes/Ventastega/Tiktaalik. Are they fish? Are they amphibians? Why do they look like both?
4. Explain the existence of stratigraphy. Gorillas cannot swim very well. Why are their bones only found in the upper rock layers? If the great flood story were true, we would probably find gorilla remains in the lower layers, not the top layers.
I know what some of you are thinking right now. "What about the evolution of the eye?"
First of all, evolutionary biologists have spoken about this before. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Eye
Second of all, even if the evolutionary biologists are wrong about the evolution of the eye, everything that I said about the fossil record is still true. Therefore, creationists still need to explain the suspicious fossil record even if they prove that some life forms in this world are irreducibly complex.
If you just believe in the Bible because of faith, don't bother responding to this thread. You can believe what you like, but if you are going to convince other people that you are correct, you need an argument more sophisticated than "... because God said so."
Darth, you are wasting your time. It is pointless to debate creationists. They operate from the view that creation HAS occured, and interpert nature in light of this conclusion. They WOULD just say its because god made it that way.
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,529
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
The kind of thing I find a lot more useful than speculating on whether Yahweh oversaw Darwinian evolution, in the sense that it seems to have real sociological heft:
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
I have a confession to make. In the past, I've been a tad harsh towards creationists ... maybe.
In this thread, I am going to give the creationists a chance to prove themselves. If the creationists want to be taken seriously, there are many questions that they must answer.
1. Human chromosome 2 looks suspiciously like a fusion of chimpanzee chromosome 2p and chimpanzee chromosome 2q.
Is this just a coincidence? Did God make it look that way? Why would he do that?
2. Explain the existence of dinosaur/bird creatures such as Archaeopteryx/Microraptor/Yi qi/Anchiornis/Icthyornis/Hesperornis/Confuciusornis. What are they? If birds are not descendants of dinosaurs, why did God put the bones of dino/bird creatures underground?
3. Explain creatures like Icthyostega/Acanthostega/Pederpes/Ventastega/Tiktaalik. Are they fish? Are they amphibians? Why do they look like both?
4. Explain the existence of stratigraphy. Gorillas cannot swim very well. Why are their bones only found in the upper rock layers? If the great flood story were true, we would probably find gorilla remains in the lower layers, not the top layers.
I know what some of you are thinking right now. "What about the evolution of the eye?"
First of all, evolutionary biologists have spoken about this before. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Eye
Second of all, even if the evolutionary biologists are wrong about the evolution of the eye, everything that I said about the fossil record is still true. Therefore, creationists still need to explain the suspicious fossil record even if they prove that some life forms in this world are irreducibly complex.
If you just believe in the Bible because of faith, don't bother responding to this thread. You can believe what you like, but if you are going to convince other people that you are correct, you need an argument more sophisticated than "... because God said so."
Darth, you are wasting your time. It is pointless to debate creationists. They operate from the view that creation HAS occured, and interpert nature in light of this conclusion. They WOULD just say its because god made it that way.
That doesn't stop some Young Earth Creationists from debating anyway. Or it didn't until few years ago. There were a number of YECs on WP years ago who did try to argue that there was empirical evidence for the literal truth of the Biblical account of Creation and the Flood. I am kind of surprised that none have come out of the woodwork to take up the gauntlet thrown down by Darth.
Saying that "Saturn is one of God's creations" is one thing.
But saying that folks in Jesus' time put saddles on dinosaurs, and that Jesus himself "probably rode dinosaurs" is something else.
I believe in creation, just not the literal "created in one week" new world type of thing. I do not see "intelligent design" and "evolution" as being mutually exclusive. I find great wonder in both sides of the coin.
I could never get behind the "big bang" theory, though. Maybe the theory where the universe keeps expanding and then collapsing, but to have NOTHING, absolutely nothing at all, complete void, oblivion, and then two tiny particles magically appear, collide, and explode into EVERYTHING? I don't know. But I guess sometimes it feels just as mindblowing to try to imagine where God Himself came from.
But it is hard to deny, that we do in fact exist, and we are cognizant of our existence, and we are not oblivion.
This is why, short of learning Hebrew, I really want to get a good translation of the Bible with annotations and read through it. My old pastor would always mention things like this, passages where King James might have missed the mark a bit, and it always irked me.
_________________
I'll brave the storm to come, for it surely looks like rain...
Saying that "Saturn is one of God's creations" is one thing.
But saying that folks in Jesus' time put saddles on dinosaurs, and that Jesus himself "probably rode dinosaurs" is something else.
Similarly, there is a big difference between a person who personally believes that Saturn was built by God, and a person who is at war with the scientific community for trying to come up with a purely natural explanation. Supernatural explanations only became bad when the people who are searching for natural explanations face discrimination.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falsifiability
People naturally have their own opinions, but it's generally not a good idea to be pushy with an idea that is just an opinion.
Being preachy is only okay when you spreading objective truths with sufficient evidence.
EDIT: Supernatural explanations can also be dangerous if they put human lives in jeopardy.
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS -> https://represent.us/
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,660
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,660
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I could never get behind the "big bang" theory, though. Maybe the theory where the universe keeps expanding and then collapsing, but to have NOTHING, absolutely nothing at all, complete void, oblivion, and then two tiny particles magically appear, collide, and explode into EVERYTHING? I don't know. But I guess sometimes it feels just as mindblowing to try to imagine where God Himself came from.
But it is hard to deny, that we do in fact exist, and we are cognizant of our existence, and we are not oblivion.
This is why, short of learning Hebrew, I really want to get a good translation of the Bible with annotations and read through it. My old pastor would always mention things like this, passages where King James might have missed the mark a bit, and it always irked me.
As a matter of fact, the Lutheran theologian, Walter Meyer, though a creationist is a proponent of the Big Bang Theory.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
We've seen in it in Promethesus
all life was seeded by a "GOD", so yeah, DNA would be very, very similar
What are you talking about?
And what does what you're talking about have to do with what we are all talking about?
The OP is about common DNA.
"Seeded creationism" as explained in Promethesus, shows us that DNA will be common, because all life came from one source, "GOD".
_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.
We've seen in it in Promethesus
all life was seeded by a "GOD", so yeah, DNA would be very, very similar
What are you talking about?
And what does what you're talking about have to do with what we are all talking about?
The OP is about common DNA.
"Seeded creationism" as explained in Promethesus, shows us that DNA will be common, because all life came from one source, "GOD".
Are you seriously arguing that life on earth was deliberately created by aliens?
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS -> https://represent.us/
What kind of farmer keeps his livestock miles away?
Aren't spacefaring aliens supposed to be smart?
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS -> https://represent.us/
That's why they're always stopping by to check up on us! Beam us up, probe and tag, clean bill of health, release us in the middle of a crop circle somewhere.
Or we're the experiment and they'd rather watch us from a distance. What's it called? The observer effect?
We could all just be one giant (crappy) computer, like in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. </spoilers>
_________________
I'll brave the storm to come, for it surely looks like rain...
Can I use this computer to play TF2?
If so, it isn't that crappy. Any computer that can run Team Fortress 2 is okay with me.
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS -> https://represent.us/