Mikah wrote:
I wouldn't say it was paedophilic to teach children about it, but there is a certain loss of innocence involved. The various letters of LGBTXYZ are either explicitly sexual identities or implicity linked to them. You can't teach it properly without crossing a line I wouldn't want to cross or confusing the hell out of kids. It's almost pointless to talk about though, the problem these days is the internet (where I imagine Lactacia was born), not creepy weirdos in schools teaching kids, though they have certainly done their fair share.
I'm not that worried about kids on the internet. If they see something that makes them feel uncomfortable, they can just turn it off.
Quote:
A question to ponder - if a child is too young to consent to sex - because their minds are not developed enough to understand what they are doing - then how can we take their supposed sexual or gender identity or crossdressing fetish at face value and allow nonsense like Lactacia to occur or allow puberty blockers for that matter?
Cross-dressing is not always a fetish. It isn't always sexual. Not all dresses are sexually provocative.
Also, there is a big difference between sex and gender identity. Children begin to exhibit gender-specific behavior before they hit puberty. In other words, children realise what gender they are
before they discover what they are sexually attracted to.
In other words, trans kids realize that they are trans before gay kids realize that they are gay.
Quote:
Remember to deny this sort of "expression" by children makes you a bigot on my side of the argument and we both go to hell to take our rightful places at the side of Hitler. It's another one of those left-wing logic traps, similar to the one that will allow trans-people to dominate female sports in a few years time.
To be honest, I want transwomen to participate in women's sports. I don't really care about sports in general. I just want to see the drama that will unfold. TERFs are hilarious when they are angry.
Quote:
It's no accident that paedophiles are very invested in sexual liberation politics - it should be obvious why. They are betting on it leading that way, and I find it difficult to argue with the logic by asking questions like the one above.
From what I've seen, most people in the sexual liberation movement nowadays are against pedophilia. In fact, they often accuse the men's rights movement of being pro-pedophilia as a smear tactic.
There are some pedophiles who consider themselves to part of the sexual liberation movement, but they usually complain about how the rest of the LGBT+ crowd is "pedophobic".
Quote:
They were much more open about it in the 70s when the sexual revolution seriously got going.
I'm pretty sure that the LGBT+ movement has changed since then.
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS ->
https://represent.us/