Share Political Videos

Post Reply New Topic

foundations, like religions, shouldn't be tax-exempt, why should your meddling be tax-exempt, just like good-doing, if it was that 'good' you wouldn't want §§ avantages, but ya.. lobbying

dow jones sustainable champions felicitate each other and themselves...
Tata Steel : ranked world's #1 steel company in Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Tata Steel retained Industry Leader position in FY18 and ranked second overall in the DJSI assessment, 2017. The Company has been recognised as the Climate Disclosure Leader in 'Steel category' by CDP (2017). Besides being a member of the World Steel Climate Action Programme, Tata Steel was felicitated with several awards including the Prime Minister's Trophy for the best performing integrated steel plant for 2014-15 and 2015-16, Best Risk Management by CNBC TV18 (2018) and 'Corporate Strategy Award' by Mint (2018). The Company also received the 'Most Ethical Company' award from Ethisphere Institute for the sixth time (2018), Steel Sustainability Champions (2017) by the World Steel Association, Dun & Bradstreet Corporate Awards (2017 & 2018), Golden Peacock HR Excellence Award by Institute of Directors (2017) as well as 'Asia's Best Integrated Report' award by the Asia Sustainability Reporting Awards (2017), among several others.
..."golden peacock hr excellence" sounds like a fun award

Thanks for sharing, nice & interesting video.

By Rubin himself. He has a partnership with Learn Liberty.

According to who? Rubin?

Media can never be unbiased. There is always a selection process behind who or what to feature in a show.

Ok. I didn't know that, though it still doesn't change anything, I'll clarify answering your next question.
His guests express a wide spectrum of political views

No, according to me, someone who actually watches his show. Bret Weinstein, Eric Weinstein, Tim Pool(Progressive lefts). Ben Shapiro, Larry Elder (Strong conservatives). Now, if this is such a scam to push a political agenda, please clarify, what political agenda is being pushed?

See, that's the thing that makes absolutely no sense to me, The Rubin Report is not media. It is a long format show in which guests are invited on and interviewed, that is not media. If he screens morons calling for socialism and communism in America I am perfectly fine with that. I do not want forced diversity to the point of discrimination, that isn't equality. I don't want men claiming they are women and crushing women's rights. None of those types of people come on the show(That I have seen anyway) and I am perfectly ok with that. So please, inform me of what particular political agenda is Koch brothers paying Rubin to push.

Former hacker Tim Pool (Progressive Left)
Topics: Free speech rally, Antifa(Masked people) attacking free speech rally. Free speech rally did attack back, reasonable actions considering that Antifa's were trowing small explosives into crowds of people. Some Antifa's even brought knives and claimed they are willing to attack people in order to push their agenda. Some of them also claim to be communists. Media reports claimed the free speecher's were 'Trumpers' which Tim found to be incorrect. While there were alot of MAGA folks, there were also liberals in the free speech rally. Cops did nothing as Antifa's threw mortars and m80 firecrackers into crowds of people. Media also claimed that the free speecher's were the violent ones when it was very clear that the Antifa's were clearly the instigators. Media with false reports included CNN. Tim pools reports on Sweden, crime and violence on the rise.

OMG, check out all these MAGA Nazis

Great, he invited the most inoffensive "leftists" he could find.

And I rest my case.

Rubin and his fans have no reason to act like moral crusaders, when they clearly don't value and act out their own "principles".


TDW - The Intellectually Dishonest Web

Andrew Yang talking about changes in labor, automation, etc.

Anyone that still supports Trump after he's shown you who he is, is a goddamn moron.

Not really. Perhaps things wouldn't be so difficult if all forms of media didn't constantly lie. How can anyone be informed when all information in circulation is constantly distorted. Take Ocasio Cortez's for example, I've seen left wing media act as if she is the best thing ever, Fox distorts her words as if any help is needed to make her look completely stupid. And I don't trust your judgement if you honestly believe crooked Hillary would have been a better pick. And also to include that you have even tried to argue that left-wing media doesn't lie.

* Also, it becomes a judgment game, who is less corrupt and which crook will try to help the economy. It's not like I think Trump is the person to admire, he is a very crappy person, but I think Hillary is much more crappy and don't see her doing anything to help the economy.

* To add even more, the complete lie that all MAGA's are white supremacists, that was the point of showing that video, I'm kinda tired of people spreading lies. I am a strong believer of honesty, I may be misinformed myself at times but one thing I stay true to is being honest rather than picking a side and claiming "My team would never lie to you", that is deception and unrealistic and further complicates issues.

I know you really hate Trump and that's ok. It's too lopsided when presenting information, people produce information to go against Trump constantly but one thing I would never expect from people opposing Trump to do is present any information about something positive Trump has done for the economy. That is the exact nature of media, Fox will mostly present positive information(Trump), CNN(& the rest)will mostly present negative information(Trump). I think political divide has gotten outrageous, most people like to pick a side and defend it while attacking the opposing side, I say it's best to side with humanity rather than the left or the right. Doesn't matter what political side they are on, what matters is how they may help the economy and humanity.

That makes everything very complicated. It would be a dream to have a legit President out to help the country and the people within it, sadly I don't see where we have had the option to vote for a person like that. Then to add so many politicians are willing to flat out lie to get votes making it difficult to spot that honest person should they ever get elected.

So common sense is now considered 'dishonest?' Moral crusaders that abandon logic, sure, lets see if we can find more of them to listen to. Lets analyse their arguments, women and men have no meaning, you can be a biological man and enter women's sports as long as you call yourself a woman yet they also insist that gender is a spectrum which is true, a spectrum of feminism and masculinity thus every single person has their own mixture of said qualities, so truly what the 'social science of gender' states is every single person has their own gender which makes gender science pretty obsolete, conclusion being that we are all individuals. Yet the reality is it takes a biological man and a biological woman to produce a child.

Or how about 'safe spaces'? Lets see, any phrase a person can say that another person can find offensive is 'hate speech'? And hate speech is assault:
----------------------------------
verb
1.
make a physical attack on.
"he pleaded guilty to assaulting a police officer"
synonyms: hit, strike, physically attack, aim blows at, slap, smack, beat, thrash, spank, thump, thwack, punch, cuff, swat, knock, rap; More
noun
1.
a physical attack.
"his imprisonment for an assault on the film director"
synonyms: (physical) violence, battery, mugging, actual bodily harm, ABH; More
2.
a concerted attempt to do something demanding.
"a winter assault on Mt. Everest"
-------------------------------
So words are 'physical attacks'? Anyone who may say something another doesn't like should be 'blocked' from speaking? That's going to get really complicated being we are all 'individuals' and no two people agree on everything. Also to include that some can find 'facts' as offensive, real logical play there.

Or how about we discuss forced diversity and call it equality yet to achieve such equal diversity we must resort to 'discrimination'. But we will also make the claim that discrimination is what we are fighting, another good argument warped in rational thinking.

Perhaps we should all consider these irrational arguments that drown themselves in contradiction and say hey.....but it's the 'moral' thing to do. Tell me how allowing men to take over women's sports or preventing people from presenting science and facts or having the right for free speech or discriminating on people by race and biological sex is 'taking the moral approach'.

*Or perhaps we should result to real violence and physically attack anyone whom opposes our beliefs, because that is truly the moral thing to do.

Those are the only arguments I have noticed to be screened out, the name is IDW, "Intelectual Dark Web" not "Irrational Dark Web"

Please take no offense, I'm not attacking you I'm attacking these arguements and would hope you don't consider any of these arguments as rational arguments. But seriously, these are the only arguments I have not heard mentioned on Rubin's show. Tim Pool has even insisted we need some forms of 'socialism' so I did not mean to include socialism, though in all fairness he said 'some forms of socialism', not the same as insisting we should become a socialist country.

LOL That was very educational, frightening and hilarious. I loved the talking Christmas penis.