Recidivist wrote:
It seems to me that you find it very difficult to aknowledge Israels treatment of Palestinians as wrong and perform mental gymanastics to validate it, which is entirely your perogative but don't expect members not to give you pushback on those kind of views.
No I am actually against the principle of using torture on prisoners. But at what actions does a country who have been attacked by what everyone agrees is terrorism take?
Hypothetically those criticising Israel can't seriously assume following 10-7 that the IDF not respond to
a. mass slaughter in their own settlements
b. mass hostage taking and rape/abuse of women/children
c, firing of rockets into Israel immediately following the 10-7 attack
I agree that retribution was part of the goal in the IDF response for a. and b. And that was not necessary but (seriously) it was inevitable. A more sensible approach would be a prisoner swap for b. to avoid casualties.
But would HAMAS have stopped firing rockets at c. if Israel tried to negotiate? I posed the question if Mexico demanding Texas and California be given back and started dropping bombs on LA and Houston and took hostages whom they raped live on TV. Would you think the US would try and peacefully negotiate? no, the US would bomb the s**t out of Mexico back to the stone age.