snake321 wrote:
Anubis wrote:
He is a symbol, an icon of the fight of communism against capitalism, and the liberation of the people of South America especially.
A general revolutionary symbol.
War and military action is sometimes the quickest and only viable way to bring about revolution and change. I wouldn't call war primitive, not with all the technology that we have now.
..... I fail to understand how he "liberated" them by putting a gun to their heads and supporting a system of violent oppression upon them. Though many in Cuba likely supported him either because they were used to being abused and knew no other way, or perhaps out of fear (as well as overly-emotional propaganda designed to attack the follower's critical thinking constructs within their brain, lead them around by blind emotions, and dummy them down to make them easier to control.... Does that type of propaganda sound kinda familiar to anyone?... Does is start to hit close to home for anyone here? If not then it's time to stop sleeping and wake up.... Because I can guarantee you no tyrant ever took over a nation over night, they followed a 10 step process to national transformation of their government).
War, as unfortunate as it may be, is sometimes necessary given certain situations, that I will agree to (although probably not in Che's case). But I'd still have to call war primitive, I don't define primitive as a technological set back, I'd define primitive as barbaric and inhumane behavior.
Emotions are part of what makes people human. Communism appeals where capitalism has become unjust and unfair to the general populace, and where there are huge socio-economic divides.
Communism is very often portrayed as brutal and tyrannical in anti-communist places, some of which is true, some of which is false. Generally, yes, it does suppress freedom to a great degree, economic to the greatest extent, as according to its basic tenets, and then individual and political freedom(Stalinism as a classic example of this). However, it also grants social equality and a usually guaranteed standard of living.
I would not call war primitive. There are some issues which can only be resolved by varying degrees of conflict. Whether it's a fight by one party for independence, freedom, and justice which can only realistically be fought by arms with great haste, rather than by long, slow diplomatic means ; or a war against antagonising, uncompromising rivals... warfare is a neccessary evil which will always plague mankind to some degree, until every human being is happy with what they have, and respects all their fellow human beings. Which will be very far into the future.
_________________
Lalalalai.... I'll cut you up!