Evolution Misconceptions

Post Reply New Topic

And he also believed that the natural state of objects is to be at rest. What was Newton thinking, proposing ideas like inertia?

Werner Von Braun?
* Dr James Allan, Geneticist
* Dr S.E. Aw, Biochemist
* Dr Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology
* Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology
* Dr Raymond G. Bohlin, Biologist
* Dr Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
* Dr Robert W. Carter, PhD Marine Biology
* Dr Ken Cumming, Biologist
* Dr Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
* Dr Nancy M. Darrall, Botany
* Dr Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry
* Dr André Eggen, Geneticist
* Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
* Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology
* Dr Maciej Giertych, Geneticist
* Dr D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
* Dr Joseph Henson, Entomologist
* Dr Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
* Dr James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology
* George T. Javor, Biochemistry
* Dr Arthur Jones, Biology
* Dr Dean Kenyon, Biologist
* Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology
* Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry
* Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry
* Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry
* Dr John W. Klotz, Biologist
* Dr Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology
* Dr Felix Konotey-Ahulu, Physician, leading expert on sickle-cell anemia
* Dr Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology
* Dr John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry
* Dr Johan Kruger, Zoology
* Dr John Leslie, Biochemist
* Prof. Lane P. Lester, Biologist, Genetics
* Dr Ian Macreadie, Molecular Biologist and Microbiologist
* Dr John Marcus, Molecular Biologist
* Dr Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher
* Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology
* Dr Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics
* Dr Jung-Goo Roe, Biology
* Dr Ariel A. Roth, Biology
* Dr Timothy G. Standish, Biology
* Dr Esther Su, Biochemistry
* Dr Michael Todhunter, Forest Genetics
* Dr Lyudmila Tonkonog, Chemistry/Biochemistry
* Prof. Walter Veith, Zoologist
* Dr Joachim Vetter, Biologist
* Dr Alexander Williams, Botanist
* Dr Ick-Dong Yoo, Genetics
* Dr Sung-Hee Yoon, Biology
* Dr Henry Zuill, Biology


http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4983

BTW, this is not "appeal to majority" so don't bother with the "project Steve" crap; this is QUALITATIVE, AND NOT QUANTITATIVE, as if you had the ability to understand the difference.

Very true. Just because someone has scientific accomplishments in one field doesn't mean they're right or even remotely scientific in other fields, or that accomplished scientists cannot change to profoundly non-scientific attitudes (like Johannes Stark). Plus, they only had the evidence available at the time to work on. Scientific truth is determined by the balance of the evidence, not by who endorsed a theory before that evidence was even available.
Creationism is basically the following: 'if I can find any shred of scientific-looking evidence or arguments in favour of what I will believe regardless of any evidence, so much the better; if not, I'll appeal to revelation.'

lol... still waitin on some creationists to find a flaw in this website... about the "misconceptions"

no takers......... hmmm.

A part from being "utter CRAP", no.

Haven't read it, just annoyed by Quatermass. That's why I posted.

Maybe you should, and correct the one regarding evolution and religion and whether they are mutually exclusive.

You didn't seem to be annoyed by a quarter of his posts

Usually he is practically praising Quatermass. "Oh yes, you're so great"

That was before the MEME thread.

Touche

What is this infamous MEME thread?

well what you're doing is an appeal to authority and avoiding presenting any actual contradictions to the theory of evolution and presenting any kind of evidence that supports creationism.

edit: and is including nazis kosher?

And not even a Nazi biologist but a Nazi engineer/applied physicist. As you say, that's an appeal to authority rather than to any actual evidence. Don't worry iamnotaparakeet about us mistaking this for the 'appeal to majority' argument because most modern biologists are not creationists. Somehow we're supposed to see a list containing a very, very small fraction of the biology-related PhDs in the world (and no actual evidence) and fall on our knees and swear that they've got to be right.

Here here!

surprise!

no one has opted to pick apart these misconceptions yet in order to support all this "crap evidence" against evolution