pezar wrote:
I don't think we should have money at all. Large extended families should make most of what they consume themselves, and barter for what they can't. It would be primitive, and could only support a world population of about 300 million, but those 300 million would live pure lives. Life would be hard, but more importantly there would be none of this relying on other people for stuff.
Yeah right. I have better things to do than waste my life toiling away making soap, butter, crapping outside in the dead of winter, and eking out my meager existence by pure chance and the whims of nature. I don't know what your deal is with this "a more pure life" business because it's a rather crude life. To live a more pure life would be a life of spiritual and intellectual growth, not simply a grinding away of the muscles and intellectual stagnation. There's a good reason why we don't live like people used to 150 years ago.
pezar wrote:
Smallpox released by Al Qaeda kills 95% of the human race. Only small communities remain. Humanity is forced back into a primitive state of existence. It would be like what happened after the fall of Rome, only global.
Well guess what, you can take your neo-ludite trash and shove it. Go live with the Amish or move to alaska (a lot of untapped land there) and get eaten by a bear. Even if terrorists do reduce civilization to the extent that you assume they will, it's only a matter of time before civilization is rebuilt and there's a new renaissance. It's happened more than once. Why? Because it's human nature to
create.
Quote:
Did you know that clinical depression does not exist in primitive tribes?
Did you know primitive tribes kill each other and cannibalize their victims? That's not just the random bad apple like in our society, that's
life for them. The primitive life is a savage and barbaric life. Just try and visit any of the last tribes which still exist in the rain forest and see for yourself.
Quote:
Would I give up everything to live a simple existence? I've considered it, but making a full break is generally impossible as the Unabomber discovered. His inability to ditch the modern world eventually led him to strike back out of rage. The rest of society would need to be dismantled too, and the only way it will happen is via global collapse.
I think it's fitting you bring up the Unabomber. His irrational murdering and hatred is what the anti-civ is at its core: It's barbarism.
_________________
LadybugS's boyfriend