Cyanide wrote:
Umm, lowering taxes DOES help the economy, because it gives people more disposable income. More disposable income = more spending = better economy. Though, since our government already has been putting us in major debt for years (thanks to Bush, and now Obama), lowering taxes is kind of a stupid thing to do without seriously cutting spending first.
As for the banks failing, the government guarantees... I think it's $200K of savings now (even though that's just more printed fiat money, but oh well). I fail to see how you can justify rewarding banks for their incompetence. The fact that giant banks and corporations know they can rely on the government creates moral hazard. This pretty much means that they will gamble in stupid ways, because they know that the government will cover their losses. This makes everyone worse off. Conversely, If the government *didn't* intervene like this, then businesses/banks would have to act more prudently... otherwise they would fall without the government catching them (like they should).
Disposable income??? MILLIONS of people have lost their jobs and millions more are dangerously close to losing theirs!
ONLY a small percentage of affluent people who own property that generates revenue have the
luxury of disposable income.Supply-side economics deliberately ignores the other crucial half of the equation which has the UTMOST RELEVANCE at the present time:
DEMAND. The economy is not going to recover until the demand is restored and people start spending and putting money back into the economy and investors are willing to risk venture capital.