Page 3 of 12 [ 177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next


Should it be legal to deny the holocaust?
Yes 75%  75%  [ 52 ]
No 25%  25%  [ 17 ]
Total votes : 69

Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

29 Mar 2009, 6:07 pm

Are there any other examples of radical political movements being specifically held back by the law in Germany? All I know about post-war German politics is an overview of the history of East Germany and the results of the last election.



Concenik
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 441
Location: not in average tinfoil fanlnand teeth optional

29 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm

sartresue wrote:
Concenik wrote:
sartresue wrote:
Hector wrote:
Should denying the holocaust be legal?

Disclaimer: I do not deny the holocaust and am not interested in discussing whether or not the holocaust took place. I am interested in discussing whether it should be legal to deny the holocaust.


A matter of interest topic

I am interested in whether the Holocaust or any genocide took place, because such horrendous deaths are denied for political reasons. There are ulterior motives for denying genocides, especially the Holocaust. Denying it itself is not a crime in Canada. Nor is it a legal event. What is a problem is what happens when people deny an event such as the Holocaust. It is done to discredit a group of people and their suffering, and so if the Holocaust is false then other things said about or by the people who have suffered a genocide is also disbelieved. Then there is the hate speech which often accompanies the drivel proposed by genocide deniers. Spreading of hate and when it is proven in court is a crime in Canada, not the denying itself.


sorry - no offence but that line of reasoning is a logical fallacy - it doesn't necessarily follow at allthat that would be the case - it is your opinion fair enough but you present it as a statement of fact..


A matter of fact topic

It is the case. This is precisely why people deny certain events and not others. I was not presenting it as a logical argument, as ulterior motives are not a matter of logic--just politics and emotional agendas. Just as your assertion about post WW2 Israel gives away your agenda. :twisted:


No that's just your presumptive bias - that is exactly the kind of thing I'm taking about. I don't believe I have an agenda I am just being honest.

I think you are wrong insofar that it was indeed a logical fallacy. some events are spoken about and ithers taboo mostly due to socio-political imperatives not because if they are talked about that will cause A to happen, which then will lead to B, then C etc all the way to a repeat occurrence of the same events - I think that is rather flimsy reasoning - no offence - I think it is a product of being bombarded with what we are supposed to think and what is thoughtcrime so much as we are put into the 'socialisation' process. I think by saying I have an agenda - potentially meaning I am bigoted is in itself an evocation of the very process of reinforcing taboo so it becomes a self sustaining thing - we effectively police each other's thoughts. What I said is only something which I happen to agree with that Norman Finkelstein says - does he have the same 'agenda' too? 8O :D



Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

29 Mar 2009, 7:04 pm

Hector wrote:
Are there any other examples of radical political movements being specifically held back by the law in Germany? All I know about post-war German politics is an overview of the history of East Germany and the results of the last election.


There were two parties forbidden in post-war Germany in the 1950s: The communist party and a neo-nazi-party. Forbidding the far-right NPD failed at the Federal Constitutional Court some years, because of some formalities regarding undercover agents of the authorities. But there is long a list of smaller organisations frequently suppressed by law.

The far right plays in former East-Germany a role, but in Germany as a whole they never had a chance to pass the 5%-threshold for gaining seats in the Lower House of Parliament.



history_of_psychiatry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,105
Location: X

29 Mar 2009, 8:18 pm

Even though most holocaust deniers are bigots, freedom of speech should never be illegal. I think it's idiotic that you can be imprisoned in parts of europe simply for denying the holocaust. It's a known fact that the holocaust happened, so why are we so uptight about holocaust deniers? Let them spout their dumb asses off.


_________________
X


vibratetogether
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: WA, USA

29 Mar 2009, 8:23 pm

This is the area where America shines over Europe.

Freedom of speech is designed to protect the speech that offends you. Anyone can hold any opinion and let that opinion be known.

When you create exceptions to this (with the exception of things such as fighting words, yelling "fire!", etc), you create a slippery slope wherein opinions you personally hold could become illegal to express. It is best not to open that door.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

29 Mar 2009, 10:49 pm

Well, the ones on the winning side are the ones who write history books, aren't they?


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

29 Mar 2009, 11:11 pm

:oops: I just screwed up the poll. I had it in my head that the question was "should it be Illegal to deny.... " and so I voted NO.

The issue is really do we all have access to a free and fair media. If we do then it should be easy to set the record straight on issues.

We are all facing a concerted pernicious attack on our freedom of speech and association.

Just this week the Canadian Government refused a visa for George Galloway, a British member of parliament and vocal anti war protester. Canada's government has labelled Galloway a "national security" threat and ordered he be permanently barred from Canada because there are "reasonable grounds" to believe he is a member of a terrorist organization and/or a supporter of terrorism.

His 'support for terrorism' amounts to speaking out in defence of the people of Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. Galloway also provided food and other aid to the Palestinians. this effectively to makes it a crime to express solidarity with and provide humanitarian aid to these people


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


Concenik
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 441
Location: not in average tinfoil fanlnand teeth optional

29 Mar 2009, 11:21 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
:oops: I just screwed up the poll. I had it in my head that the question was "should it be Illegal to deny.... " and so I voted NO.

The issue is really do we all have access to a free and fair media. If we do then it should be easy to set the record straight on issues.

We are all facing a concerted pernicious attack on our freedom of speech and association.

Just this week the Canadian Government refused a visa for George Galloway, a British member of parliament and vocal anti war protester. Canada's government has labelled Galloway a "national security" threat and ordered he be permanently barred from Canada because there are "reasonable grounds" to believe he is a member of a terrorist organization and/or a supporter of terrorism.

His 'support for terrorism' amounts to speaking out in defence of the people of Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. Galloway also provided food and other aid to the Palestinians. this effectively to makes it a crime to express solidarity with and provide humanitarian aid to these people


It was the JDL that lobbied Harper's people to ban him entry.. there was quite a good interview from uk telly on youtube with galloway and the leader of the Canadian JDL. It's obscene that they prevented him entry but even though he's sold as a maverick Galloway is nevertheless a champagne socialist prostrate at the temple of mammon, for sure

I agree that our freedoms are under serious attack and a lot of people out there don't even seen to know,care or believe it :roll:

it's going to get bad imo



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

30 Mar 2009, 2:49 am

Concenik wrote:
Galloway is nevertheless a champagne socialist prostrate at the temple of mammon, for sure

I agree that our freedoms are under serious attack and a lot of people out there don't even seen to know,care or believe it :roll:

it's going to get bad imo


I never said that I agreed with his politics, personally I despise social democrats as betrayers of the working class. But he should be heard and to deny him that right because he has sympathy for an oppressed people is very scary.


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


Gromit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302
Location: In Cognito

30 Mar 2009, 10:55 am

TallyMan wrote:
OK. Dumb question time... Why were laws introduced making it illegal to deny the Jewish holocaust? The only two things that spring to mind are:

1. Denial would offend survivors of the death camps or the families of those killed... Ok but surely not worthy of a law forbidding it.

2. There is an old idiom along the lines of "Those that forget the lessons of history are condemned to relive it". So in other words if everyone ended up believing the Jewish holocaust never happened then such a thing could happen again and people would be less suspicious... thinking "no, can't be happening - people don't disappear by the million into death camps"; making a repeat of history more likely.

Anyone know?

In Germany and Austria, both those reasons apply. Holocaust denial coming from there would be especially offensive. A third reason is the German experience with distorting history. One factor that favoured the rise of the Nazi party was the claim that Germany was holding its own in World War I, but that the armed forces were stabbed in the back by politicians. Not true, but widely believed. Add a few related ideas, and there was a widespread belief that Germany was being unjustly held down by other countries. A party promising to reverse this looked good to many people.

After World War II, it was decided that the holocaust should be remembered, so that reasonable people couldn't so easily be led to believe that the Nazis were a good thing. After World War I, history lessons in German schools, and probably most conversations in the pubs, presented the outcome of the war as a great wrong perpetrated against Germany. Making holocaust denial illegal was part of the effort to prevent the same thing from happening again. Another part is that World War II in Europe and the Atlantic is unequivocally (and correctly) presented as a war of aggression chosen by the German government.

Concenik wrote:
Hmm, it's contentious but in 1946 i guess it was a different situation vis a vi press et al but I'd hazard a guess that it's partially attributable to the position that it largely precludes criticism of the Israeli state in it's policy towards land rights and human rights of the Palestinians.

It doesn't. If people were logical about these things, it should motivate greater concern for all human rights, not just the human rights of some. But the right wing Israeli lobby would like people to believe that Jewish victim status in the holocaust turns everything Israel does into self defense, and it's been an effective tactic.

Concenik wrote:
Thing is I have Jewish friends who are really open minded and one of them will totally agree with you that the official account is off mark

I think if the official count is 50% off either way from the true number, it really doesn't matter all that much. It it's 3 million instead of 6 million, I will not conclude that the Nazis weren't really all that bad after all. The point is not to play a numbers game. The point is that genocide was a deliberate policy, the Nazis imposed laws in all the territories they held to catch all those they wanted to kill, they went at it in a systematic fashion, and they made an industry out of extermination.

Concenik wrote:
a lot of stuff was about demonising the Germans too.. soap, shrunken heads etc - its clear that these claims were propagandic fantasy concocted by the NKVD and to a lesser extent the western allied forces...but even now some people will say that it's fact!

If you want facts, read The Theory and Practice of Hell. Then judge for yourself.



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

30 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm

Gromit wrote:

Concenik wrote:
a lot of stuff was about demonising the Germans too.. soap, shrunken heads etc - its clear that these claims were propagandic fantasy concocted by the NKVD and to a lesser extent the western allied forces...but even now some people will say that it's fact!

If you want facts, read The Theory and Practice of Hell. Then judge for yourself.


actually, the soap part is very true. I live in a town where a factory of "human soap" was situated and it still exists as a museum/reminder of it. the whole process is very well documented (the author of the recipe was very proud of himself and made sure his ideas lasted).


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


Concenik
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 441
Location: not in average tinfoil fanlnand teeth optional

30 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm

anna-banana wrote:
Gromit wrote:

Concenik wrote:
a lot of stuff was about demonising the Germans too.. soap, shrunken heads etc - its clear that these claims were propagandic fantasy concocted by the NKVD and to a lesser extent the western allied forces...but even now some people will say that it's fact!

If you want facts, read The Theory and Practice of Hell. Then judge for yourself.


actually, the soap part is very true. I live in a town where a factory of "human soap" was situated and it still exists as a museum/reminder of it. the whole process is very well documented (the author of the recipe was very proud of himself and made sure his ideas lasted).



Can you give me some details about that so I can look into it for myself?(again). I am surprised that I do not know about this factory musuem tbh. But it shows that I still need to do more searching. I know that there are things which are still thought of today as fact which are not - for instance the shrunken heads at Buchenwald main camp which it was shown beyond doubt to have been anti german propaganda at the end of the war - that's not to underestimate the atrocities of the NSDAP, of course.

I live in East Germany so maybe I could even visit the place one day on person and see with my eyes and look into ti myself properly for the sake of finding out the truth either way.

I'd really like to be able to see the evidence relating to the soap factory myself... thanks :)



Last edited by Concenik on 30 Mar 2009, 3:37 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Concenik
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 441
Location: not in average tinfoil fanlnand teeth optional

30 Mar 2009, 2:39 pm

Gromit wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
OK. Dumb question time... Why were laws introduced making it illegal to deny the Jewish holocaust? The only two things that spring to mind are:

1. Denial would offend survivors of the death camps or the families of those killed... Ok but surely not worthy of a law forbidding it.

2. There is an old idiom along the lines of "Those that forget the lessons of history are condemned to relive it". So in other words if everyone ended up believing the Jewish holocaust never happened then such a thing could happen again and people would be less suspicious... thinking "no, can't be happening - people don't disappear by the million into death camps"; making a repeat of history more likely.

Anyone know?

In Germany and Austria, both those reasons apply. Holocaust denial coming from there would be especially offensive. A third reason is the German experience with distorting history. One factor that favoured the rise of the Nazi party was the claim that Germany was holding its own in World War I, but that the armed forces were stabbed in the back by politicians. Not true, but widely believed. Add a few related ideas, and there was a widespread belief that Germany was being unjustly held down by other countries. A party promising to reverse this looked good to many people.

After World War II, it was decided that the holocaust should be remembered, so that reasonable people couldn't so easily be led to believe that the Nazis were a good thing. After World War I, history lessons in German schools, and probably most conversations in the pubs, presented the outcome of the war as a great wrong perpetrated against Germany. Making holocaust denial illegal was part of the effort to prevent the same thing from happening again. Another part is that World War II in Europe and the Atlantic is unequivocally (and correctly) presented as a war of aggression chosen by the German government.

Concenik wrote:
Hmm, it's contentious but in 1946 i guess it was a different situation vis a vi press et al but I'd hazard a guess that it's partially attributable to the position that it largely precludes criticism of the Israeli state in it's policy towards land rights and human rights of the Palestinians.

It doesn't. If people were logical about these things, it should motivate greater concern for all human rights, not just the human rights of some. But the right wing Israeli lobby would like people to believe that Jewish victim status in the holocaust turns everything Israel does into self defense, and it's been an effective tactic.

Concenik wrote:
Thing is I have Jewish friends who are really open minded and one of them will totally agree with you that the official account is off mark

I think if the official count is 50% off either way from the true number, it really doesn't matter all that much. It it's 3 million instead of 6 million, I will not conclude that the Nazis weren't really all that bad after all. The point is not to play a numbers game. The point is that genocide was a deliberate policy, the Nazis imposed laws in all the territories they held to catch all those they wanted to kill, they went at it in a systematic fashion, and they made an industry out of extermination.

Concenik wrote:
a lot of stuff was about demonising the Germans too.. soap, shrunken heads etc - its clear that these claims were propagandic fantasy concocted by the NKVD and to a lesser extent the western allied forces...but even now some people will say that it's fact!

If you want facts, read The Theory and Practice of Hell. Then judge for yourself.


Afaic if people die en masse due to having been worked to death in camps or disease which they wouldn't have contracted if it weren't for internment, experiments, executions, wiping out of villages.. all these things..

That is still of course GENOCIDE.

I am sorry but I do doubt this claim of industrialised systematic execution. The Nazis committed genocide - I don't deny that. However there is no documentary proof of what you say other than the wannsee document and the German is soo bad in it that it is widely cited as being NKVD propaganda - I believe it is.

You link to a book of a personal testimony - many of these have since the first holocaust stories surfaced proved untenable and contradictory.

I think people WERE murdered in gas chambers - but I think the primary function of the gas chambers was for delousing - sorry if that offends you, I am no nazi, nor nazi sympathiser - I have lost practically all of my anti-fa friends since I started looking into this some years ago. I just have spent painful amounts of time looking into it with an open mind - and yes the Nazis were incredibly hideous and murderers but I just don't believe any more the claims are logistically possible. Have you looked into it as much as me to say I am wrong or a simply a bigot? no? then please don't make that idle and easy to spit claim.

Why should a narrative of ONE BOOK 'PROVE' to me that what you say is true - I have spent years looking into this now because I want to know the truth.

You know the testimonies(?) of surviving camp inmates who claimed they were asking the Germans to take them with them from Auschwitz when the Germans left because they didnt want to be left there for when the Russians arrived? No? it's not a well publicised fact but it is nevertheless true. It comes from testimony accounts of camp survivers which are now quite suppressed - I have watched them myself - so I know they are is real.

Why don't you watch the film by the David Cole (who is Jewish) who, like me, began to see MAJOR FLAWS in the official history - he made a film of when he visited Birkenau and interviewed the musuem curator - he told tthe curator he was Jewish (which HE IS) and asked a lot of questions he had prepared over the years of his research..

Now he is in hiding - for some years - as the Jewish Defence league has put the equivalent of a fatwa on his head.

Also why do we always learn and think about this as the ONLY relevant Genocide????

What about the largely Jewish managed NKVD during the HOLOMODOR??? Don't believe me? Here read this editorial from ynet news section 'israel opinion' - ie jewish sourced. I have a jewish friend to thank for sending me this article.

Quote:
Sever Plocker



Stalin's Jews

We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish

Published: 12.21.06, 23:35 / Israel Opinion

Here's a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka.



Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB.



We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.



Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, "opposition members" who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.



In his new, highly praised book "The War of the World, "Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University's Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.



Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined "terror officials," cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.



All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union's archives have not yet been fully opened
Advertisement

to the public. But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD's and KGB's service. The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of "How could it have happened to us?" As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.



And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."



Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book "Stalin: Court of the Red Star", Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.



Stalin's close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the "first Stalinist" and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao's terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.



Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We'll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.



In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a "carnival of mass murder," "fantasy of purges", and "essianism of evil." Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history.



The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and "Soviet people." Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and "play dumb": What do we have to do with them? But let's not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things.



Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of "our hangmen," who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 99,00.html



Politics is divisive. No doubt some idiots will now proclaim me a 'hater' I AM NOT!! ! It's not my problem if some people aren't with the ability to ask the difficult questions and cope with difficult conclusions which may ostracise them from the majority

I will always stand against the pitchfork and torches crowd. The only important thing is integrity and the reality when it comes to this issue.

As NORMAN FINKELSTEIN the Jewish American academic - who is persona non grata now in Israel due to his vocal stance against Israeli treatment of Palestinians - who lost his tenure for this too. - as he says and goes to great depth to show in his book: THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY

the selling and positioning of the Jewish holocaust as the ONLY important one is OBSCENE and used VERY MUCH SO as a blind for Israeli to pursue it's own genocide with IMPUNITY.

What is happening NOW is more important than what happened 60 years ago - sorry if that is harsh to hear but it is msho



I remember during the genocide in Rwanda there was not much being said in the news at all during those first two weeks when the UN sealed the fate of millions - I happened to be aware that it was taking place from independently sourced journalism but I remember that there was a big thing on the TV about remembering the Holocaust in WW2 - THAT IS SICK + PERVERTED!! !!

wake up, it's a SCAM nowadays. sorry to be blunt. I know I can say this without fear of being a HATER as mant Jews are also saying it if you'd only listen to them.

2 cents



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

30 Mar 2009, 4:00 pm

To just spruik your opinions without citing supporting evidence is meaningless. You are asking us to ignore well documented interviews with survivors, guards, rescuing army units, physical evidence, German military documentation, film footage, civilian interviews, just the creation of the ghettos by itself goes a long way to suggest the authorities regard of the Jews.

You talk about camp prisoners that wanted to go with the retreating Germans, what nationality and subset of the prison were these people. The cyanide gas was used primarily to delouse, so the humans were used as coathangers and their death was a side effect?!

So sources and evidence please,

It is true that the Jews have laid claim to the Holocaust as all about them. The degree to which the political, disabled, religious, and other cultures that were also targeted have been left out of the discussions is a travesty.


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


Concenik
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 441
Location: not in average tinfoil fanlnand teeth optional

30 Mar 2009, 4:06 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
To just spruik your opinions without citing supporting evidence is meaningless. You are asking us to ignore well documented interviews with survivors, guards, rescuing army units, physical evidence, German military documentation, film footage, civilian interviews, just the creation of the ghettos by itself goes a long way to suggest the authorities regard of the Jews.

You talk about camp prisoners that wanted to go with the retreating Germans, what nationality and subset of the prison were these people. The cyanide gas was used primarily to delouse, so the humans were used as coathangers and their death was a side effect?!

So sources and evidence please,

It is true that the Jews have laid claim to the Holocaust as all about them. The degree to which the political, disabled, religious, and other cultures that were also targeted have been left out of the discussions is a travesty.


Well, there's no need to be flippant Arthur ;) I don't think my post was 'meaningless' _ I think that's a bit of an unfair summation and I was giving opinion as to why I find it objectionable that it is the considered the MOST important genocide in contemporary history. As if others were less so - I posted an article about the HOLOMODOR which was largely managed by Jews - and think that that is an IMPORTANT counterbalance for an real discussion into prejudice and if talking about whether the revised historical analysis' of the holocaust should be allowed or not even if they are set with nefarious agenda - which of course I think all should be allowed even if really disgusting as curbing free speech leads to such things as genocide ultimately. the Holomodor - of which people are generally ignorant in comparison to the genocide of the Jews and gypsies etc. How is that not providing any back up to my opinion? I think you are a bit keen to bring me down. because I may not be in step with your own opinion? I cannot think why you would post that what I said is 'meaningless' otherwise . thanks for the coffee though.

Annyway, contrary to your assertion I HAVE given you something to look at - ie the film made by David Cole who as I said is Jewish..

why not start there?



Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

30 Mar 2009, 4:22 pm

Concenik wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
Gromit wrote:

Concenik wrote:
a lot of stuff was about demonising the Germans too.. soap, shrunken heads etc - its clear that these claims were propagandic fantasy concocted by the NKVD and to a lesser extent the western allied forces...but even now some people will say that it's fact!

If you want facts, read The Theory and Practice of Hell. Then judge for yourself.


actually, the soap part is very true. I live in a town where a factory of "human soap" was situated and it still exists as a museum/reminder of it. the whole process is very well documented (the author of the recipe was very proud of himself and made sure his ideas lasted).



Can you give me some details about that so I can look into it for myself?(again). I am surprised that I do not know about this factory musuem tbh. But it shows that I still need to do more searching. I know that there are things which are still thought of today as fact which are not - for instance the shrunken heads at Buchenwald main camp which it was shown beyond doubt to have been anti german propaganda at the end of the war - that's not to underestimate the atrocities of the NSDAP, of course.


To stay with the legal situation in Germany: Neither the sec. 130 Criminal Code nor the EU-Directive CNS/2001/0270 does forbid to investigate more closer and look into single issues.

But: The proof that millions of Jews were factory-like murdered is so overwhelming, that the denial of this basic fact can be only used for specific reasons; To whitewash Hitler & co.