The Gun Culture is Somewhat In Denial About Gun Safety.
You are indeed correct!
In fact, the last person to try and do a truthful study on gun control in this country was caught by the NRA Gestapo and tortured for the names of all accomplices. What was left of him was executed by an NRA firing squad under the command of NRA Hauptsturmfuhrer Wolfgang Von Raptor.
His family and all the accomplices that were rounded up were sent to NRA concentration camps where they toiled as slave laborers in gun factories and were never heard from again.
It's just unspeakable the death grip the NRA has on this country and the tyranny we live under as a result.
Just unspeakable.......
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1809263
I won't even bother to dive into that enough to find out the truth about what the NRA did or didnt do in this case. IMHO they'd be at least mostly right if not entirely so.
CDC stands for Center for Disease Control and should not misused as an annex to push the The Brady Center's or anyone else's anti-gun agenda. Guns are not a disease nor are they disease carriers, they do not emit gamma rays, leak toxins, and do not take control of people's minds. I have several guns but have never been adversely affected by them.
I double-dog dare you to find a case where someone was.
The CDC taking ANY stand on this subject makes anything they do suspect since they have proven to be biased.
guns are a public health issue associated with injury and death.
You are indeed correct!
In fact, the last person to try and do a truthful study on gun control in this country was caught by the NRA Gestapo and tortured for the names of all accomplices. What was left of him was executed by an NRA firing squad under the command of NRA Hauptsturmfuhrer Wolfgang Von Raptor.
His family and all the accomplices that were rounded up were sent to NRA concentration camps where they toiled as slave laborers in gun factories and were never heard from again.
It's just unspeakable the death grip the NRA has on this country and the tyranny we live under as a result.
Just unspeakable.......
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1809263
I won't even bother to dive into that enough to find out the truth about what the NRA did or didnt do in this case. IMHO they'd be at least mostly right if not entirely so.
CDC stands for Center for Disease Control and should not misused as an annex to push the The Brady Center's or anyone else's anti-gun agenda. Guns are not a disease nor are they disease carriers, they do not emit gamma rays, leak toxins, and do not take control of people's minds. I have several guns but have never been adversely affected by them.
I double-dog dare you to find a case where someone was.
The CDC taking ANY stand on this subject makes anything they do suspect since they have proven to be biased.
guns are a public health issue associated with injury and death.
Then forks and spoons are a public health issue associated with obesity, a leading cause of serious illness and death.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
So is Congress going to study educating two year olds or idiots?
As is said, Idiot proof something, someone will invent a better idiot.
My Gun Cult is not in denial, Gun Safety is not passing a written test, it is acting like you have something that can kill at a hundred yards, all the time.
If a two year old could set it off, so could digging around in the purse for a lipstick.
Women have been seen tossing their purse around. A safety is a easy to use thumb lever, and needs the protection of a holster. A holster needs to be secured to something, they come with clips, belt loops.
If you are going to reach for a gun, it should be well secured so it stays in the same place.
Pulling a hairbrush on an armed assailant does not work.
Pulling a firearm on an armed assailant will get you shot.
The time to pull a firearm is just before you fire two rounds, one in the chest, one in the head.
Few people consider that part.
Guns don't do stupid, people do.
You are indeed correct!
In fact, the last person to try and do a truthful study on gun control in this country was caught by the NRA Gestapo and tortured for the names of all accomplices. What was left of him was executed by an NRA firing squad under the command of NRA Hauptsturmfuhrer Wolfgang Von Raptor.
His family and all the accomplices that were rounded up were sent to NRA concentration camps where they toiled as slave laborers in gun factories and were never heard from again.
It's just unspeakable the death grip the NRA has on this country and the tyranny we live under as a result.
Just unspeakable.......
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1809263
I won't even bother to dive into that enough to find out the truth about what the NRA did or didnt do in this case. IMHO they'd be at least mostly right if not entirely so.
CDC stands for Center for Disease Control and should not misused as an annex to push the The Brady Center's or anyone else's anti-gun agenda. Guns are not a disease nor are they disease carriers, they do not emit gamma rays, leak toxins, and do not take control of people's minds. I have several guns but have never been adversely affected by them.
I double-dog dare you to find a case where someone was.
The CDC taking ANY stand on this subject makes anything they do suspect since they have proven to be biased.
guns are a public health issue associated with injury and death.
Then forks and spoons are a public health issue associated with obesity, a leading cause of serious illness and death.
obesity is being studied and plate size is a factor. and you're playing with semantics. so guns aren't the public health issue. gun injuries and gun deaths are.
You are indeed correct!
In fact, the last person to try and do a truthful study on gun control in this country was caught by the NRA Gestapo and tortured for the names of all accomplices. What was left of him was executed by an NRA firing squad under the command of NRA Hauptsturmfuhrer Wolfgang Von Raptor.
His family and all the accomplices that were rounded up were sent to NRA concentration camps where they toiled as slave laborers in gun factories and were never heard from again.
It's just unspeakable the death grip the NRA has on this country and the tyranny we live under as a result.
Just unspeakable.......
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1809263
I won't even bother to dive into that enough to find out the truth about what the NRA did or didnt do in this case. IMHO they'd be at least mostly right if not entirely so.
CDC stands for Center for Disease Control and should not misused as an annex to push the The Brady Center's or anyone else's anti-gun agenda. Guns are not a disease nor are they disease carriers, they do not emit gamma rays, leak toxins, and do not take control of people's minds. I have several guns but have never been adversely affected by them.
I double-dog dare you to find a case where someone was.
The CDC taking ANY stand on this subject makes anything they do suspect since they have proven to be biased.
from your biased persective you can win all arguments by claiming the science against your views is biased.
You are indeed correct!
In fact, the last person to try and do a truthful study on gun control in this country was caught by the NRA Gestapo and tortured for the names of all accomplices. What was left of him was executed by an NRA firing squad under the command of NRA Hauptsturmfuhrer Wolfgang Von Raptor.
His family and all the accomplices that were rounded up were sent to NRA concentration camps where they toiled as slave laborers in gun factories and were never heard from again.
It's just unspeakable the death grip the NRA has on this country and the tyranny we live under as a result.
Just unspeakable.......
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1809263
I won't even bother to dive into that enough to find out the truth about what the NRA did or didnt do in this case. IMHO they'd be at least mostly right if not entirely so.
CDC stands for Center for Disease Control and should not misused as an annex to push the The Brady Center's or anyone else's anti-gun agenda. Guns are not a disease nor are they disease carriers, they do not emit gamma rays, leak toxins, and do not take control of people's minds. I have several guns but have never been adversely affected by them.
I double-dog dare you to find a case where someone was.
The CDC taking ANY stand on this subject makes anything they do suspect since they have proven to be biased.
guns are a public health issue associated with injury and death.
Then forks and spoons are a public health issue associated with obesity, a leading cause of serious illness and death.
obesity is being studied and plate size is a factor. and you're playing with semantics.
Then that's idiotic as well. Just stack food higher on the smaller plate or buy bigger plates. Is there going to be a federal ban on big plates? Will big plates made before the ban be "grandfathered" in? Will I have to pay a $200 "health risk" tax on each and every big plate?
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
You are indeed correct!
In fact, the last person to try and do a truthful study on gun control in this country was caught by the NRA Gestapo and tortured for the names of all accomplices. What was left of him was executed by an NRA firing squad under the command of NRA Hauptsturmfuhrer Wolfgang Von Raptor.
His family and all the accomplices that were rounded up were sent to NRA concentration camps where they toiled as slave laborers in gun factories and were never heard from again.
It's just unspeakable the death grip the NRA has on this country and the tyranny we live under as a result.
Just unspeakable.......
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1809263
I won't even bother to dive into that enough to find out the truth about what the NRA did or didnt do in this case. IMHO they'd be at least mostly right if not entirely so.
CDC stands for Center for Disease Control and should not misused as an annex to push the The Brady Center's or anyone else's anti-gun agenda. Guns are not a disease nor are they disease carriers, they do not emit gamma rays, leak toxins, and do not take control of people's minds. I have several guns but have never been adversely affected by them.
I double-dog dare you to find a case where someone was.
The CDC taking ANY stand on this subject makes anything they do suspect since they have proven to be biased.
from your biased persective you can win all arguments by claiming the science against your views is biased
Sue me.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
doctors do recommend eating off of smaller plates as that has been proven to leave people more satisfied while consuming less. just as pediatricians in every state but florida (thanks NRA) tell gun owners to keep their guns unloaded and locked in a safe. and psychiatrists tell people with depression to distance themselves from their guns - give them to a relative for safekeeping or sell them.
So Florida is under the boot heel of NRA occupation now?
Oh, those poor people.....
Well here's a message for them during this darkest hour.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
that's a crime in states with UBC. you can't just give a gun to to a relative for safekeeping you have to do a back round check, and then the gun is theirs, now you're never get it back if because you legally gave it to them its not yours anymore. you could't later legally fight it if they refuse to give it back.
really wish it would just start I'm so tired of being attacked by you all. just ban the 2nd come for guns let the blood and deadly 2nd civil war start. but don't expect most the military and police to be on your side, so be prepared to pick up an evil gun and kill for what you think is right. but then will you be any better then those you clam are bad?
the people who want to ban guns or want gun control want others to do the dirty business, they wont' be the ones stacking up on house after house watching their friends die, having their other friends and family turn against them.
of course most the smart ones know this and its why they'll trying to ban guns tiny step by tiny step.
Being vociferously anti-Second Amendment appears to be a "special restrictive interest" and "routine." That has been my opinion for months here.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
Where has this survey been replicated? By whom? The surveys of Kleck and Lott, among others, have invited replication which has held up in subsequent surveys.
This survey ( http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/ab ... 013.301409 ) was published in 2013 and reviewed "data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting Systems database on gun ownership and firearm homicide rates across all 50 states during 1981 to 2010." It is well known among criminologists that the peak for U.S. violent crime occurred between the early 1980s and the early 1990s during the crack-cocaine epidemic within urban areas. When the epidemic decreased substantially before the mid-1990s, U.S. firearm-related deaths continued to decrease. This survey appears to have cherry-picked the epidemic decade to pump up its results and pretend that they exist in today's world. They don't.
Since the epidemic decreased noticeably, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics shows this continuing through 2011 ( http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf ). Localized-data reports show that this decrease continues today.
this lott?
http://politicalmoll.com/john-r-lott-fu ... arm-facts/
I have nothing against guns, per se.
I wouldn't attack anyone for being pro-gun. I wouldn't like it if somebody was so vociferously pro-gun that the very idea permeates his/her brain.
I don't really care that much about guns myself, to be honest. Guns are something to be fired. They're used in hunting. They're used in target practice. They are sometimes used in crimes. There should be some kind of regulation of guns--but it's not a life & death situation for me.
Now.....gay rights--and the progress of people of alternative sexuality--now that's important!
And our financial situation.
I wouldn't attack anyone for being pro-gun. I wouldn't like it if somebody was so vociferously pro-gun that the very idea permeates his/her brain.
I don't really care that much about guns myself, to be honest. Guns are something to be fired. They're used in hunting. They're used in target practice. They are sometimes used in crimes. There should be some kind of regulation of guns--but it's not a life & death situation for me.
Now.....gay rights--and the progress of people of alternative sexuality--now that's important!
And our financial situation.
theres already thousands and thousands of gun laws, its already regulated. too far if you ask many gun owners(you know the ones being attacked and have everything to lose)
protecting the rights of one group of people while destryong the rights of another group. yup the left is so very concerned about people
I wouldn't attack anyone for being pro-gun. I wouldn't like it if somebody was so vociferously pro-gun that the very idea permeates his/her brain.
I don't really care that much about guns myself, to be honest. Guns are something to be fired. They're used in hunting. They're used in target practice. They are sometimes used in crimes. There should be some kind of regulation of guns--but it's not a life & death situation for me.
Now.....gay rights--and the progress of people of alternative sexuality--now that's important!
And our financial situation.
theres already thousands and thousands of gun laws, its already regulated. too far if you ask many gun owners(you know the ones being attacked and have everything to lose)
protecting the rights of one group of people while destryong the rights of another group. yup the left is so very concerned about people
kraftiekortie likes to come to these threads and poke the hornet's nest then cry when he gets stung.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Howdy. I'm a girl and I definitely believe in the Second Amendment. I own two guns (neither of which were built with safeties - a Ruger and a Sig Sauer). I learned how to shoot both in a class setting and have them locked up in a gun case loaded. It's just me and Waldo - no kids. I never grew up with guns so I don't feel totally comfortable around them. I felt the need to have a gun after living on my own. I have a home alarm system, but if someone comes in here the alarm will sound and the company ends up calling to make sure the alarm was real - I could be dead by then, so that's where the guns come in. I live on the top floor, but in the past 5 yrs it has been the top condos that have been broken into. I have them for home safety only. I even have hollow points so if I need to shoot it will be less likely for the bullet to go into the next condo. A pharmacist I worked with said I need a shotgun. I haven't done that yet. I would need someone to help me shoot that as I feel that is a little too much gun for me and my shoulders and I know most definitely that that would shoot the person (forget a bullet) right into the next condo and it would be hard to clean up the mess. The positive would be I wouldn't have to worry about being a good shot.
One thing that is happening now here in Kansas is that people can now conceal and carry WITHOUT a license. It just started this month. I feel uncomfortable about that. I do think a person should qualify first by taking a class (especially on gun laws) and then show they can handle their gun properly and shoot a target. I will not carry a gun with me as I'm scared of having to use it and something happening that shouldn't have happened (like missing my target and shooting someone else, etc) and going to prison. I have things to lose like my nursing license and my job. I can't just be toting a gun around town like Calamity Jane. Usually if you do see a conceal carry person pull their gun it always makes the news. I sure don't need that. However, the oddballs that shouldn't have any guns are the ones running around with one because they don't have anything to lose. Another thing, I'm tired of politics using guns as the problem every time there is a shooting. It gets to be old crap.
Good people need guns. There's just too many crazies out there. It's not always about just the safety of children. We had a trauma happen here. The gunshop I purchased one of my guns from was owned by a husband and wife. She taught me and my Ma how to shoot the guns we purchased. One Friday about 3 months ago 4 thugs ran into the place shooting it up and ended up killing her husband - he died at the hospital I work at. Her husband (me and Ma could swear that they had told us when we bought our guns that he was a cop) shot two of the idiots and one ended up being in our ICU for a couple months. The others ran to houses in back of the gun store and could have hurt other people but were eventually caught. That experience was very upsetting as this woman had just opened this gun shop made specifically for women - to teach them classes in self protection. I believe she reopened the store, but I haven't been back since I buy my bullets online. To be honest, I would be creeped out going back in the store - too many memories. No one will ever talk me into giving up my guns .......unless I'm forced to.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.