I hate feminazis

Post Reply New Topic

There are always members of any marginalized class that enforce the class system on those beneath them; there were black slaves during slavery who were all for beating an uppity field hand, and who taught their own children to obey the master because it was right and good that black people should be slaves. That didn't make slavery, or what they taught their children, a 'black' system; it meant, usually, that those were some of the few individuals who benefited from the (white) American slave system as it was.

I'll reiterate again, when feminists talk about 'the patriarchy' (or when social scientists talk about the antebellum south), they're talking about the system, the aggregate of all people; they're talking about statistical outcomes. It's not about YOU, it's about whether someone like you, all other factors being equal, is statistically likely to do better or worse than, say, a female 'you' or a black 'you' or a gay 'you.' Because individual lives, when you add up one interaction after another over a lifetime, are influenced in their sum by those statistics.

If you had exactly the same parents and exactly the same education, but were black and had started experiencing the racism of this society since before you started to grow a beard (think Tamir Rice), would you be the same person you are now? Would you have achieved as much? What if you were the same person, with the same parents, but you went to a 90% African American school in an inner city, with rife gang violence? Would you be the same? What if you were the same you, with the same parents, but your parents had only half, or a third, or a fifth of the wealth that your parents actually have, because African American families carry less wealth on average.
The fact that you (I'm assuming, based in large part on the fact that you haven't mentioned any privation and you're on the internet, which means internet access and probably at more than a cell phone level given the detailed fisking that you are doing) didn't experience those things doesn't make you a bad person, by any means; you do not need to feel guilty over the privileges you have had simply for being born as you actually are. But if you allow yourself to think, once in a while, 'Sheeeiiit, that guy has had a really f*****g difficult life in a way that I can barely comprehend, we should change the country so that more people have the privileges I had growing up,' rather than 'Sheeeiit, that guy f****d up, he deserves to suffer for his sins*,' then maybe we can make this nation a little better.

*note please that I am not saying that 'you,' 0equalstrue, think this way; it's more of a plural, social 'you.' Because I *have* seen and heard other Americans speaking and writing this way.

edit: the fact that there are gender roles, in general (that is, the idea that there are genders, and that they fill different roles in society) are biological; afaik there hasn't ever been a human society without gender roles, although the native Americans were reputed to be at least somewhat fluid in some of the tribes. However, gender roles in specific (that is, the idea that one gender should do a and the other should do b) are clearly socially constructed, ridiculous evo-psych studies notwithstanding; for example, there was one that came out of England a couple of years ago, that was widely circulated in the media (as 'studies' which support the status quo always are) which purported to show that women liking pink and men liking blue was somehow innate, and which wasn't even supported by the researcher's own data if you actually read the study. Very, very few evopsych studies on gender or any other subject include real outgroups; the vast majority don't even make an attempt at involving outgroups, because it's way cheaper for university researchers to just use university students who, coincidentally, come from the same culture as the researchers themselves.

I am sure femnazis hate the mention the name of Sargon the Assad, critisizing and dismantling their hypocracy not to mention their double standards and high levels of stupidity and ignorance. Hes the bane of rad fems his bane damage is like +350 insta death!

Yeah. There is #GamerGate conflict still ongoing. Infamous Anita Sarkeesian the feminist rights activist ruined it alongside with Zoe Quinn, Brianna Wu and the other Social Justice Warriors. She is so clueless and considering worst YouTube channel due to Social Justice Warriors feminist movement. They need to stop corrupt journalists/critics who were feminist, anti-GamerGate, and Social Justice Warriors. Anita Sarkeesian from Feminist Frequency need to quit. Just like Uwe Boll the infamous German-Canadian film director who made the movie based on video game. I know that Tropes vs Women in Video Games will be end in 2016 due to too many complaints. I'm a neutral to #GamerGate and SJW started it first by Gawker's Kotaku writers, Zoe Quinn and Nathan Grayson declared GamerGate as hostile just like started Eastern Ukraine War (same year as #GamerGate conflict was started).

Noone really cares about Gamergate any more, sorry to ruin this MRA circlejerk

Gamergate was, and is, a joke.

Astroturf faux feminist advocacy is real, and is not a joke.