Why is there so much liberal hate?

Post Reply New Topic

Well Joker, exporting jobs is just one of the many features of something that we call
Capitalism. And since you want big government off our backs, stop telling other people(including corporate executives) how to do business!

Okay, Joker, for YOU I won't "de-rail" it........

Only in part. Businesses had deserted the inner cities out of lack of social responsibility, and - yes, I'll say it - racial prejudice against the mostly people of color living there.
As far as those jobs being shipped over seas is concerned, that, too, is a matter of business putting their greed above the social contract they should be taking part in with the American people.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

You can have Capitalism with out sending jobs over seas. Plus China does practice Capitalism but do you see them sending jobs to our country? the answer no you do not. I would like to see American Made things by Americans, Not China Not India but by Americans. It should be the interests of our country first.

And a goverment big enough to give you everything is a goverment big enough to take it all away.

Businesses exist to make money. What incentive do they have to be socially responsible and give back to their communities if doing such doesn't increase their profits? (Or not doing so causes them to lose money).

Do you Really expect private companies to put the nations interests first on their own accord? China does not allow outsourcing of jobs by chinese companies because the GOVERNMENT PREVENTS IT.

I hope you finally see why government is important and that unrestricted capitalism will ruin a country.

It's the dirt cheap labor and operating costs that gave China it's edge. It's too hard for domestic production to compete when the only break US manufacturers get is that they don't have to ship things as far....

In the long term, I think it would create money for business and investors, as the financial growth of the community would create a consumer base. But as I stated, it's a long term plan, not some get-rich-quick scheme capitalists seem to be enamored with.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

The state's direct sponsorship of Chinese industries certainly helps as well. For instance, in the modern business world, hacking and other industrial theft through networks is extremely common, and much of it comes from China. US or other nation's businesses do their best to defend their network infrastructure and secrets stored in databases, but it is hard to do when you are a business taking on a nation- which is what taking on Chinese companies really means. It is some kind of "state capitalism", not really about free markets. It also encourages cronyism and corruption. China and other nations that are making their mark with state capitalism will end up suffering in the long run

There is another issue: US manufacturers tended not not to upgrade/modernize/streamline their production efforts while the Japanese did. China got in the act with cheap labor and overhead.
You absolutely have to have efficient processes to compete with Asia.
The manufacturing arm of my employer has spent mega-bucks streamlining design and processes to compete internationally.

Then kudos to your employer.
Believe it or not, I am in agreement with you.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

It's hard to rise above these things. If I pay taxes, I know a set percentage of those taxes is going to their welfare. Even if they wish cancer upon me and my family, as they've done several times, I pay when they get cancer. While they call white women fair game, I have pay for their medication when they get themselves infected with a venereal disease. As they throw stones at my house and pull plants from my garden, I pay for their housing. It's hard to rise above it if you're not only forced to allow these people into your country, and have to stand by as they commit acts of violence and vandalism, but are also forced to pay to keep them healthy, fed and housed.

I'm glad several popular political parties are now trying to get requirements for welfare - you need to speak Dutch, you can't have a criminal record and you need to have lived here for some time. That would literally exclude more than half of Moroccan men in a few years from receiving welfare, as well as a sizeable percentage of Moroccan women.



That's your moral view. It's also mine, but that's beside the point. From Breivik's moral point of view, what he did is not immoral or wrong. He is not wrong in thinking that, because there are no objective criteria that make something morally right or wrong. Morality can't be measured, is embedded either in a person or in a society, and there is no such thing as universal morality. A cynic might think that this could have been a good thing, because they'll cause much less pollution now that they're dead. Some politicians undoubtedly took this opportunity to stress their points of view.



You can see what their morals are, and how their morals correspond to yours, or to his, or to Krishna's for all I care, but you can't call them right or wrong, because there's no way to determine that.



Education is part of the way you're raised. I had religious education in primary school, and social studies throughout secondary school.



Understand why. If Breivik is mentally unstable, or demented, or as narcissistic as they say he is, I understand why these events would drive a man that crazy to do such a thing.



It makes them nothing, which suits my claim perfectly - it was a minority that was actively involved in the rebellion. A minority aided by foreign countries.



Right here. Not just young people, but Christian native Americans who had been thrown around a few times.



That's where.

F*ck, I bet that was painful
One of the impediments to this kind of progress is culture. Management in some companies (to put it conservatively) has a tendency toward autocracy which doesn't lend itself well to progress toward global competition. Management also has the bean counters and investors screaming for more profits during these slow transitions from old to new. Non-management has job security fears of being streamlined out of a job. There is a painful teething period to go through that a company without it's collective head int the game might not survive.

Do you even know what a social contract is? Or did you sleep your way through psychology?

We should do that too.

Again. When witnessing a fight between a chihuahua and a pit bull, conservatives want liberals to express equal (or greater) outrage at the chihuahua for fighting dirty when attacked.