slowmutant wrote:
Morality, for the most part, is agreed-upon and tacitly understood.
obviously not.
Quote:
Morality is both universal and relative.
translation: i want it my way even though i'm wrong.
Quote:
Sometimes it is more relative than universal.
translation: i'm obviously wrong here but still want to be right.
Quote:
Beliefs are idiosnycratic by comparison. There's really no rhyme or reason to the various things people believe when looked at as a whole.
actually there is a pretty solid correlation. just take you as an example. devout christian whose morals are defined by the archaic rules of the church. many people fall in line with that a la asch conformity experiment.
Quote:
What's so immoral about family values? We need family values, right? Right?
your morals aren't "family values", just "family values" is a title that you (and many other religious devotees) put on their personal morality and wish to enforce on others as the fascists you are.
you disregard others' personal rights and freedoms for your own comfort and your own narrow world view.
maybe if you're creating the master race's perfect family, your family values work but for the rest of us, we're not interested in fascism.