i am legitimately scared about trump becoming president

Post Reply New Topic

Security ate another post. This is annoying.

Yes it is GD annoying!
When you see your reply is missing hit the back arrow until it takes you back past the captcha to where you wrote your reply and it should still be there.
From there one of two things should work.
- Either hit submit and see if it takes that time after the captcha.
- Do a copy then paste it if captcha eats it again then re-submit. Sometimes you just hve to play with it like that.

In any case, Trump is teh awesomesauce!

He'll tell you he is

I always preview and then submit, sometimes having to back up a time or two. I haven't had a problem not being able to post in quite a while since doing this.

I for one love the captchas. I like having my posts eaten. You people just need to stop whining!

Jk

Anyway, it looks like we found something we can all agree on

you want a pompous bigot with no real sense about money or business to be president?

Last edited by Fugu on 28 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pointing out how you can't dodge a bullet= no particular reason

Good point, fishy!

^
Aw...The little fish has a new friend.
Isn't' that sweet.

So, uh, how are you not a troll?

he'd tell you, but he would have to read your post first, and that's a thing those wily leftists do.

He has a boifriend here on WP.....I won't mention who it is though!

to repeat myself: Constitutional. Amendment.
...Assuming, again, that I grant your interpretation, which I do not.

Hacking. Bitcoin markets. Spam. Supercookies as used by Verizon, et. all. etc.

Depends on who’s using them and for what purpose. Shooting a gun is really not like playing COD and there is some skill involved. In some cases a hammer can be a more desirable killing weapon.
1. Quieter
2. Much cheaper
3. Easier to obtain
4. The satisfaction and sheer joy of personally and up close stoving someone’s skull in that just can’t be experienced by using any gun.
[/quote]
... which is why the military makes sure that soldiers have access to hammers everywhere they go, right? Again: guns are very good tools for killing things. Other tools might be used for killing as an accessory function, or might be more primitive killing tools, but guns are currently one of the most effective way for killing someone dead. I have personally seen multiple types of wounds in the ED, and bullet wounds are second only to explosives in the level of tissue damage caused by a deliberate weapon.

Yes, I get angry when people are deliberately obtuse and think that they're making a point. See above.

Most? Yes.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... show-loop/
^depending on the study, 15-22% of sales don't use a background check.
http://csgv.org/issues/universal-background-checks/
^this one suggests 2/5 of sales use no check.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/0 ... und/207722
^this one says about 1/3 of sales have no check (34%), and includes some lovely sting videos at gun shows.


No. I'm proposing that private transfers require a background check, not that anyone selling a gun has to register as a dealer. Private car transfers do not require private car sellers to call themselves auto dealers.



Edit: another note on guns vs. knives.

The same day as Sandy Hook here in the US, a different madman armed with a cooking knife attacked a kindergarten in China and attacked the students there, slashing as many children as he could reach.
'Ah, see?' You say. 'Knives are just as bad as guns.'
But there is a catch, of course, or I wouldn't mention it:
None of the children in the Chinese attack died. Not a single one. They were horrifically injured, but don't you think a parent would rather have a scarred child than a dead one?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chenpeng_ ... l_stabbing

... which is why the military makes sure that soldiers have access to hammers everywhere they go, right? Again: guns are very good tools for killing things. Other tools might be used for killing as an accessory function, or might be more primitive killing tools, but guns are currently one of the most effective way for killing someone dead. I have personally seen multiple types of wounds in the ED, and bullet wounds are second only to explosives in the level of tissue damage caused by a deliberate weapon.

Yes, I get angry when people are deliberately obtuse and think that they're making a point. See above.

Most? Yes.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... show-loop/
^depending on the study, 15-22% of sales don't use a background check.
http://csgv.org/issues/universal-background-checks/
^this one suggests 2/5 of sales use no check.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/0 ... und/207722
^this one says about 1/3 of sales have no check (34%), and includes some lovely sting videos at gun shows.


No. I'm proposing that private transfers require a background check, not that anyone selling a gun has to register as a dealer. Private car transfers do not require private car sellers to call themselves auto dealers.



Edit: another note on guns vs. knives.

The same day as Sandy Hook here in the US, a different madman armed with a cooking knife attacked a kindergarten in China and attacked the students there, slashing as many children as he could reach.
'Ah, see?' You say. 'Knives are just as bad as guns.'
But there is a catch, of course, or I wouldn't mention it:
None of the children in the Chinese attack died. Not a single one. They were horrifically injured, but don't you think a parent would rather have a scarred child than a dead one?[/quote]

How do you regulate hacking and spamming? (Just curious)

Ask a computer expert. I am a biologist.