Jiheisho wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Jiheisho wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Quote:
The Wayne County Board of Canvassers deadlocked 2-2 Tuesday along party lines on whether the county's Nov. 3 election results should be certified as at least four state and federal lawsuits sought to stop the process.
The decision came after a number of absentee ballot poll books in Detroit were found to be out of balance, a situation that did not stop the same board from certifying the results in the August primary or the county's November 2016 general election results.
Quote:
In August, 72% of Detroit's poll books were found to be out of balance, a condition that precluded them from being used if a recount were requested. The issues prompted the state to send in additional help ahead of the general election, including veteran state elections official Thomas.
Detroit had problems with precinct count mismatches in the November 2016 election. Election officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 59% of precincts in the city during a countywide canvass of vote results with most of the issues involving too many votes.
Source:
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/17/wayne-county-canvassers-deadlock-certifying-november-3-election-results/6324274002/Thanks for cherry picking that article to support your agenda. At least you posted the source so we can see your game.
Not sure why you falsely make accusations of "cherry picking" or an "agenda" - It was relevent information relating to the election results (the topic under discussion), which had only recently been published (this being the first article about it that I had seen), and which has the potential to have an impact on the electoral college vote from that state.
Because you are making it look like there is an issue, when there are two side in the story. Why didn't you take quotes stating there was no issue with the count? And why would a few votes (and there is no indication those votes were for a particular candidate) would change the count? The fact is there is nothing in the story that would change the outcome.
Yes, you have consistently made post supporting a particular agenda. You are not a neutral broker.
Just because you may not like what is posted (and so it doesn't align with your personal agenda) does not mean that the person posting it has an agenda...
I also heard a rumour that the Wayne County Board of Canvassers has just agreed to certify the results, on the condition that the Secretary of State’s office conducts a comprehensive audit of the unexplained\out of balance precincts across the county.
How many votes are affected (and whether this will actually occur) I don't know - I just pass along the facts as they appear.
As you (and others) are getting so much joy from publishing anything supporting one side (while ignoring\downplaying anything beneficial to the alternative viewpoint), it would be impolite to have tried to beat you to posting those details, so I simply publish the side that you would prefer to remain hidden in order to bring balance to the discussion.
17 Nov 2020, 9:19 pm
