Page 28 of 29 [ 458 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29  Next

Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 1:38 pm

Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
Tariffs on stuff from China hurts the merchant in the West, not China. We are now dependant on stuff they make


Sounds like the merchant's problem. They chose to build their business model poorly, they can deal with the results of that.


And you were just talking about punishment for China for making stuff we want. How do you propose to do it because like I said tariffs are no issue to them


It's not like only one solution can be attempted. You regulate importing plastics and you regulate use of them.

How would you address the issue of plastic pollution? Is there a free market solution or would you just ignore the problem?


Biological breakdown of plastic by bacteria. There is research on this.

Regulation of every piece of plastic and outright banning isn't gonna fly. That's outrageous and impossible.


Like I said, it's not as though more than one solution can't be implemented. I don't believe banning all plastics is likely to be viable, but that doesn't mean regulations can't be used to strongly disincentivize some uses in the meantime.

Yet again you've relied upon twisting what I said in order to rebut it, likely because you know you can't actually do so without misrepresenting what I had said.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

16 Nov 2021, 1:42 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
Tariffs on stuff from China hurts the merchant in the West, not China. We are now dependant on stuff they make


Sounds like the merchant's problem. They chose to build their business model poorly, they can deal with the results of that.


And you were just talking about punishment for China for making stuff we want. How do you propose to do it because like I said tariffs are no issue to them


It's not like only one solution can be attempted. You regulate importing plastics and you regulate use of them.

How would you address the issue of plastic pollution? Is there a free market solution or would you just ignore the problem?


Biological breakdown of plastic by bacteria. There is research on this.

Regulation of every piece of plastic and outright banning isn't gonna fly. That's outrageous and impossible.


Like I said, it's not as though more than one solution can't be implemented. I don't believe banning all plastics is likely to be viable, but that doesn't mean regulations can't be used to strongly disincentivize some uses in the meantime.

Yet again you've relied upon twisting what I said in order to rebut it, likely because you know you can't actually do so without misrepresenting what I had said.


People will never stop using throw away plastic. It's too much a part of how people operate now.

BTW who is actually for such a ban.who isn't a hypocrite because everyone in a modern country uses plastic all day every day.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 1:47 pm

Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
Tariffs on stuff from China hurts the merchant in the West, not China. We are now dependant on stuff they make


Sounds like the merchant's problem. They chose to build their business model poorly, they can deal with the results of that.


And you were just talking about punishment for China for making stuff we want. How do you propose to do it because like I said tariffs are no issue to them


It's not like only one solution can be attempted. You regulate importing plastics and you regulate use of them.

How would you address the issue of plastic pollution? Is there a free market solution or would you just ignore the problem?


Biological breakdown of plastic by bacteria. There is research on this.

Regulation of every piece of plastic and outright banning isn't gonna fly. That's outrageous and impossible.


Like I said, it's not as though more than one solution can't be implemented. I don't believe banning all plastics is likely to be viable, but that doesn't mean regulations can't be used to strongly disincentivize some uses in the meantime.

Yet again you've relied upon twisting what I said in order to rebut it, likely because you know you can't actually do so without misrepresenting what I had said.


People will never stop using throw away plastic. It's too much a part of how people operate now.

BTW who is actually for such a ban.who isn't a hypocrite because everyone in a modern country uses plastic all day every day.


I'm not sure anyone is for a total ban on plastics so I'm still not sure why you even brought up the idea. :roll:


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

16 Nov 2021, 1:53 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
Tariffs on stuff from China hurts the merchant in the West, not China. We are now dependant on stuff they make


Sounds like the merchant's problem. They chose to build their business model poorly, they can deal with the results of that.


And you were just talking about punishment for China for making stuff we want. How do you propose to do it because like I said tariffs are no issue to them


It's not like only one solution can be attempted. You regulate importing plastics and you regulate use of them.

How would you address the issue of plastic pollution? Is there a free market solution or would you just ignore the problem?


Biological breakdown of plastic by bacteria. There is research on this.

Regulation of every piece of plastic and outright banning isn't gonna fly. That's outrageous and impossible.


Like I said, it's not as though more than one solution can't be implemented. I don't believe banning all plastics is likely to be viable, but that doesn't mean regulations can't be used to strongly disincentivize some uses in the meantime.

Yet again you've relied upon twisting what I said in order to rebut it, likely because you know you can't actually do so without misrepresenting what I had said.


People will never stop using throw away plastic. It's too much a part of how people operate now.

BTW who is actually for such a ban.who isn't a hypocrite because everyone in a modern country uses plastic all day every day.


I'm not sure anyone is for a total ban on plastics so I'm still not sure why you even brought up the idea. :roll:


I mean a total ban on single use plastics ie shopping bags, water bottles, etc. That's what you want banned in the OP and that's outrageous. Fortunately there is zero chance of this actually happening.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 2:20 pm

Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
Tariffs on stuff from China hurts the merchant in the West, not China. We are now dependant on stuff they make


Sounds like the merchant's problem. They chose to build their business model poorly, they can deal with the results of that.


And you were just talking about punishment for China for making stuff we want. How do you propose to do it because like I said tariffs are no issue to them


It's not like only one solution can be attempted. You regulate importing plastics and you regulate use of them.

How would you address the issue of plastic pollution? Is there a free market solution or would you just ignore the problem?


Biological breakdown of plastic by bacteria. There is research on this.

Regulation of every piece of plastic and outright banning isn't gonna fly. That's outrageous and impossible.


Like I said, it's not as though more than one solution can't be implemented. I don't believe banning all plastics is likely to be viable, but that doesn't mean regulations can't be used to strongly disincentivize some uses in the meantime.

Yet again you've relied upon twisting what I said in order to rebut it, likely because you know you can't actually do so without misrepresenting what I had said.


People will never stop using throw away plastic. It's too much a part of how people operate now.

BTW who is actually for such a ban.who isn't a hypocrite because everyone in a modern country uses plastic all day every day.


I'm not sure anyone is for a total ban on plastics so I'm still not sure why you even brought up the idea. :roll:


I mean a total ban on single use plastics ie shopping bags, water bottles, etc. That's what you want banned in the OP and that's outrageous. Fortunately there is zero chance of this actually happening.


Usually demands get set higher early on with the expectation that they will be negotiated down later. It's not really that outrageous to try to reduce usage of single-use plastics by as much as humanly possible even if a small number of consumers complain about trivial impacts in might have on them.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

16 Nov 2021, 2:26 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
Tariffs on stuff from China hurts the merchant in the West, not China. We are now dependant on stuff they make


Sounds like the merchant's problem. They chose to build their business model poorly, they can deal with the results of that.


And you were just talking about punishment for China for making stuff we want. How do you propose to do it because like I said tariffs are no issue to them


It's not like only one solution can be attempted. You regulate importing plastics and you regulate use of them.

How would you address the issue of plastic pollution? Is there a free market solution or would you just ignore the problem?


Biological breakdown of plastic by bacteria. There is research on this.

Regulation of every piece of plastic and outright banning isn't gonna fly. That's outrageous and impossible.


Like I said, it's not as though more than one solution can't be implemented. I don't believe banning all plastics is likely to be viable, but that doesn't mean regulations can't be used to strongly disincentivize some uses in the meantime.

Yet again you've relied upon twisting what I said in order to rebut it, likely because you know you can't actually do so without misrepresenting what I had said.


People will never stop using throw away plastic. It's too much a part of how people operate now.

BTW who is actually for such a ban.who isn't a hypocrite because everyone in a modern country uses plastic all day every day.


I'm not sure anyone is for a total ban on plastics so I'm still not sure why you even brought up the idea. :roll:


I mean a total ban on single use plastics ie shopping bags, water bottles, etc. That's what you want banned in the OP and that's outrageous. Fortunately there is zero chance of this actually happening.


Usually demands get set higher early on with the expectation that they will be negotiated down later. It's not really that outrageous to try to reduce usage of single-use plastics by as much as humanly possible even if a small number of consumers complain about trivial impacts in might have on them.


The number of consumers who use them is everybody and his brother. The impact would be anything but trivial.

Of course people like you have zero ability to make these delusions reality. You can make all the demands you want, and no one will care. The non event strike proves this but here you still are banging your head against the wall.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 2:35 pm

I'm sure you'd love if everyone who disagreed with you just gave up and stopped trying to change things. Thankfully that's unlikely to happen.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

16 Nov 2021, 2:40 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
I'm sure you'd love if everyone who disagreed with you just gave up and stopped trying to change things. Thankfully that's unlikely to happen.


What did the non event change?



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm

Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
I'm sure you'd love if everyone who disagreed with you just gave up and stopped trying to change things. Thankfully that's unlikely to happen.


What did the non event change?


Well, I guess we should all give up now, one action didn't accomplish everything we want all at once.

I know you'd like your opponents to think like that but like I said, it's unlikely to happen.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

16 Nov 2021, 2:46 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
I'm sure you'd love if everyone who disagreed with you just gave up and stopped trying to change things. Thankfully that's unlikely to happen.


What did the non event change?


Well, I guess we should all give up now, one action didn't accomplish everything we want all at once.

I know you'd like your opponents to think like that but like I said, it's unlikely to happen.


That's my point there was no action. Some woke delusionals imagined there would be but the worker on the street didn't even know about this fantasy.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 3:21 pm

Axeman wrote:
That's my point there was no action. Some woke delusionals imagined there would be but the worker on the street didn't even know about this fantasy.


You're aware that some workers are people you'd describe as woke delusionals and you likely underestimate their numbers within the workforce. When people realize they're not in a position to make an action they plan and prepare to increase their chances of success, they don't just give up.

Taunting them likely isn't the wisest approach, remember how the establishment (and left) laughing at the Trump crowd only served to motivate them further?

I wouldn't count on that approach working better this time around, especially when it's a younger cohort that's mostly driven by worries about their future being stolen from them in exchange for further padding some people's bank accounts.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

16 Nov 2021, 3:27 pm

Quote:
Well, I guess we should all give up now, one action didn't accomplish  everything we want all at once  much of anything at all.
There; corrected it for you!

:D You are welcome!



Axeman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Aug 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,435
Location: USA

16 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Axeman wrote:
That's my point there was no action. Some woke delusionals imagined there would be but the worker on the street didn't even know about this fantasy.


You're aware that some workers are people you'd describe as woke delusionals and you likely underestimate their numbers within the workforce. When people realize they're not in a position to make an action they plan and prepare to increase their chances of success, they don't just give up.

Taunting them likely isn't the wisest approach, remember how the establishment (and left) laughing at the Trump crowd only served to motivate them further?

I wouldn't count on that approach working better this time around, especially when it's a younger cohort that's mostly driven by worries about their future being stolen from them in exchange for further padding some people's bank accounts.


You mean people like that Tik Toker whose video I posted? Zoomers? Believe me I'm not worried.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,330
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Nov 2021, 3:56 pm

Fnord wrote:
Quote:
Well, I guess we should all give up now, one action didn't accomplish  everything we want all at once  much of anything at all.
There; corrected it for you!

:D You are welcome!


I feel like having a bunch more people go from being curious to actively seeking to engage further is an accomplishment even if it's one that occurred outside of your bubble. Certainly by it's own it's not world-changing but that doesn't mean it's nothing.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.