Remnant wrote:
Belfast, the more of us speak up for our rights, the more minds will change. Things like this reach a critical mass and then they tip. Congratulations to anyone who stands up for their rights on this.
I feel vulnerable, have a courage defecit, and am excessively afraid of other people's power to ruin my life. Those prevent me from being more "open/out there" about my beliefs/opinions/practices. I do understand the "critical mass" concept, though it's lonely being a pioneer before the mainstream shifts/catches up.
Remnant wrote:
The "clear and present danger" standard is not satisified when some people screw up while using it and other people pretend the drug caused the screwing up.
Another thing-if access to criminalized drugs were legal, hope it would be easier to know what one is taking & what f/x (pros & cons) to prepare for. Contrast that w/now, people end up w/all sorts of unknown materials, since underground is only source-no way to separate legit from scam. Like prohibition, w/folks being poisoned by harsh chemicals & hard alcohol, quite the opposite of the "harm reduction" approach.
Plus, it's been too easy to make drugs a scapegoat-people expect it, fits w/their preconceptions. It's self-perpetuating, the more people surrender responsibility for their actions to a substance, the less clear it is which f/x really are inherent properties & which are just our assumptions. Folks excuse themselves by thinking & saying "that wasn't me, it was the drug that made that bad choice". If people could get honest, balanced info. about each drug & be certain of which drug he/she is taking (not a given, currently), that's a start.
_________________
*"I don't know what it is, but I know what it isn't."*