What do you think regarding gay people?

Page 4 of 8 [ 121 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

b9
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

19 Jul 2009, 11:42 am

phil777 wrote:

"no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet."

Now now, what movie did i hear that from again? ><

if you heard it "again" you must have watched it more than once.

i do not know what "movie" it is from. i just said it.

exhausted
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 667

19 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm

do not poke or tease the (queer) redhead.

not interested in marriage in the least. but why shouldn't i be able to (assuming i fall in love with a biological woman?) if you're worried about heterosexual marriage, set up a marriage counseling practice.

_________________
punctuation... life is full of punctuation.

Atomsk
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,423

20 Jul 2009, 1:59 am

b9 wrote:

Atomsk wrote:

b9 wrote:

i do not think it is unnatural to imagine a sexual unity between two heterosexual beings that were designed to "fit" with each other.

What evidence is there to suggest humans were designed by something?

there is evidence that they are following an evolutionary pathway in that a mans p*nis is designed to fit into a woman's v*gina. a womans v*gina is designed to accept a man's p*nis.

but all a man can do to another man is push his p*nis into the other man's bottom, and that is what suffices as a "hole". it is a biologically ineffective hole to plug into.
there is no evolutionary reason to do it.

Atomsk wrote:

I would respond to your other points but I am too lazy right now. Perhaps later.

no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet.

Our brains evolved too, which allowed us to invent the technology which allows two men to make a baby as long as they have a surrogate, or two women to make a baby, or two sterile people make a baby.

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

20 Jul 2009, 2:41 am

Atomsk wrote:

b9 wrote:

Atomsk wrote:

b9 wrote:

i do not think it is unnatural to imagine a sexual unity between two heterosexual beings that were designed to "fit" with each other.

What evidence is there to suggest humans were designed by something?

Atomsk wrote:

I would respond to your other points but I am too lazy right now. Perhaps later.

no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet.

Our brains evolved too, which allowed us to invent the technology which allows two men to make a baby as long as they have a surrogate, or two women to make a baby, or two sterile people make a baby.

There are all sorts of sexual entertainments utilizing all sorts of body parts indulged in by heterosexuals which have nothing to do with producing a baby. I wonder why there is no violent criticism of these marital activities. Why is it that only homosexuals get trashed for having fun with each other in odd ways? I am straight myself but am not particularly enthusiastic about producing children every time I have an opportunity to enjoy myself with sex.

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Jul 2009, 6:07 am

Atomsk wrote:

no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet.

Our brains evolved too, which allowed us to invent the technology which allows two men to make a baby as long as they have a surrogate, or two women to make a baby, or two sterile people make a baby.[/quote]

What it takes to make a baby (at the current state of technology) is one sperm, one egg and one womb. The egg and the womb do not have to belong to the same female.

ruveyn

cognito
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

20 Jul 2009, 8:05 am

ruveyn wrote:

Atomsk wrote:

no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet.

Our brains evolved too, which allowed us to invent the technology which allows two men to make a baby as long as they have a surrogate, or two women to make a baby, or two sterile people make a baby.

What it takes to make a baby (at the current state of technology) is one sperm, one egg and one womb. The egg and the womb do not have to belong to the same female.

ruveyn[/quote]
also, modern science now allows two gays to have kids that are biologically theirs. Using their own stem cells, sperm and eggs can be created.

2. if anal sex is unnatural, then we better start telling bonobos, doliphins, sheep, certain specices of snails to stop acting naturally.
3. if it was so unnatural, why is anal sex so pleasurable?

_________________
I am a freak, want to hold my leash?

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

20 Jul 2009, 8:10 am

cognito wrote:

ruveyn wrote:

Atomsk wrote:

no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet.

Our brains evolved too, which allowed us to invent the technology which allows two men to make a baby as long as they have a surrogate, or two women to make a baby, or two sterile people make a baby.

What it takes to make a baby (at the current state of technology) is one sperm, one egg and one womb. The egg and the womb do not have to belong to the same female.

ruveyn

also, modern science now allows two gays to have kids that are biologically theirs. Using their own stem cells, sperm and eggs can be created.

2. if anal sex is unnatural, then we better start telling bonobos, doliphins, sheep, certain specices of snails to stop acting naturally.
3. if it was so unnatural, why is anal sex so pleasurable?[/quote]

Define "natural"

ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

20 Jul 2009, 9:35 am

error IS natural.

evolution thrives on miscalculation, error, death and mass extinction.

even a hypothetical entire species of infertile assf**kers (excuse the term) is just as natural as the dinosaurs.

nukes are natural.

clown-fetishes are natural.

_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''

bdhkhsfgk
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 May 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,450

20 Jul 2009, 9:52 am

Edited

Last edited by bdhkhsfgk on 20 Jul 2009, 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

20 Jul 2009, 10:00 am

okay okay, gone

_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''

Last edited by ZEGH8578 on 20 Jul 2009, 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

b9
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

20 Jul 2009, 10:33 am

Atomsk wrote:

b9 wrote:

Atomsk wrote:

b9 wrote:

i do not think it is unnatural to imagine a sexual unity between two heterosexual beings that were designed to "fit" with each other.

What evidence is there to suggest humans were designed by something?

Atomsk wrote:

I would respond to your other points but I am too lazy right now. Perhaps later.

no need to worry because ne'er the twain shall we meet.

Our brains evolved too, which allowed us to invent the technology which allows two men to make a baby as long as they have a surrogate, or two women to make a baby, or two sterile people make a baby.

so what? i am not denigrating experimentation with sexual feelings. your first comment was refuting my comment that men and women are physically made for each other.
i just said that a man and a woman are naturally designed to mate with each other.
you seem to have blown it out of proportion and you consider that i am saying that the only sex that is good, is sex that is for the purpose of making a baby.

you are incorrect in assuming that is what i think.

it all started when i said i would not like to see my 12 year old son (who i do not have) watching 2 men tongue pashing with erotic desire.

well i would not like to let my child witness behavior that they may think is "cool" that may result in their evolutionary extinction.

but you impute that i am a prude, but i am just saying that if i had a young mind in my care, i would strive to provide a normal environment for them to grow in.

maybe there would be homosexual dissenters who disagree with my idea that the opposite sex is attractive, and they may intervene in my nurturance of my child and prevent me from saying it to my child because they consider it an outdated mode of thought.

bdhkhsfgk
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 May 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,450

20 Jul 2009, 10:37 am

Edited

Last edited by bdhkhsfgk on 20 Jul 2009, 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

20 Jul 2009, 10:53 am

gone,

_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''

Last edited by ZEGH8578 on 20 Jul 2009, 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

visnofskygirl
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 868
Location: Far,From you

20 Jul 2009, 10:57 am

bdhkhsfgk wrote:

ZEGH8578 wrote:

bdhkhsfgk wrote:

Is it possible for a gay couple to reach orgasms when they f*** each other in ther a****?

When it comes to GAY women, can they reach it when they move their private area against each other?

nysgjerrigper!?

i think they do. have you ever... um... YOU KNOW, in a dream?

orgasms are, like most other bodily-stuff ultimately triggered by the brain, based on the hornyness/pleasure impulses it gets.
if, to a gay couple, their... method... is fantastically fantastic, then im sure they will get an orgasm

I was always wondering what's in the adult section...
I couldn't enter there..
im not sure how lesbians do it, but its probably a little of what you described, plus a lot of other things better described in the adult section, where you cant go, and where i havent bothered to go yet.

I have done it a few times in my dreams, but when it comes to gay people getting orgs, i'm surprised at how it's possible when they do it THAT way