What is a slave and what is a prisoner? (rough notes)
I can respect that. On the other hand though, I'm also personality quite familiar with the feeling that this very existence is a big nothing - especially for the amount of blood, sweat, and tears invested in growing up right, becoming an adult, trying to make your way in the world, trying to become enough of a man or woman to be an adequate mother/father, raising kids, etc., all of that seems like a draconian price to upkeep one's life in decent standing - then just have it all evaporate out into nothingness again as a zero sum. Can't help but mention that we're also hopelessly tethered to this thing called DNA which will, by its own mechanics, insure that we remain benighted in cruelty, baseness, and stupidity as long as we continue to draw breath as a race on this earth. For someone who does perhapse get existentially sickened watching nature shows and seeing the vulgarity that genetic survival-of-the-fittest imposes on the quality and value of this existence, a big nothing becomes an even bigger nothing.
Life is what is. Some people are competent, some are not. Some are lucky, some are not. I make do with whatever is offered and find it more than adequate. Every moment is a precious treasure to me.
Perhaps I should be more explicit. A good many people are only half alive. I am an artist, a designer, a poet and a few other things. I notice and observe every moment I am alive.
Last edited by Sand on 22 Sep 2009, 2:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
That's what you keep saying to yourself. No doubt you have knowledge in many areas, but your pretensions of being able to objectively measure 'intelligence' falls short.
Also, I'm more Swedish than 99.86588062% of the human species now alive.
_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
That's what you keep saying to yourself. No doubt you have knowledge in many areas, but your pretensions of being able to objectively measure 'intelligence' falls short.
Also, I'm more Swedish than 99.86588062% of the human species now alive.
140 on the Wechsler test. Several times, too.
ruveyn
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,505
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
I'm a lot of those things myself, though I think rather than to the end of glorifying the natural world its more in effort to preserve and honor my 'self' as something separate from it and separate from its dictatorship over my life and that of others more or less my celebrating depth, celebrating the kinds of thoughts and emotions akin to spirituality (I think a lot of more epic/etherially aimed music has transcendent aims).
That's what you keep saying to yourself. No doubt you have knowledge in many areas, but your pretensions of being able to objectively measure 'intelligence' falls short.
Also, I'm more Swedish than 99.86588062% of the human species now alive.
140 on the Wechsler test. Several times, too.
ruveyn
Maybe you should read this.
"The scale, properly speaking, does not permit the measure of intelligence, because intellectual qualities are not superposable, and therefore cannot be measured as linear surfaces are measured." - Alfred Binet
I also wonder why you responded to my tongue in cheek comment in this thread as if I was serious? I thought you were smart, most people would realize I wasn't serious.
_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
As an Australian I was taught in school that the Australian colonies were started because after the American war of independence Britain could no longer send convicts to America.
Recently I thought "Wait a minute. I don't remember reading about prison colonies in America"
That is because there weren't any! England SOLD their petty criminals on the American slave markets as "indentured servants".
Australia too was built on slavery. The Governor could give huge land grants to people and then give them convicts to work the land.
If you want to see modern slavery look at conscription into the army. If the government can grab you, force you into the army and make you go overseas to kill people, then you don't own your own body or soul. The government does.
This means you are a slave.
Is there someone who is not approaching death?
The term is relative. Saying a person has one year that they expect to live, and saying that they have 50 years that they expect to live, and we see different behaviors. The person with a longer life will save more so as to spread income across all living periods, and avoid risk so to avoid loss of future expected years. The person with a shorter life has less expected living periods and loses less through risk, so they don't save and take more risks.
So, you are saying that there are unthinking non-thinkers? Wow!!
Sand, here's an issue. I don't believe that there is an objective sanity. For sanity to exist, there must be a notion of "proper order" or "purpose", and those notions can't exist out there in the universe. So, really, all insanity is, is the label that the "sane" place on those who are unlike them in ways that they consider to be wrongful. So making a demarcation of sane vs insane and pretending it is objective is just to me a sign of an "unthinking non-thinker" to use someone else's notion.
Not only that, but to say that "death is total defeat" presupposes that a person does not have values above their own life, and that their identity is fully tied to their physical existence. If my identity is instead tied to a child(could be parental, brotherly, etc), and if by my death, I save that child, then I have won, there is no question about that. The goal only includes living if you want it to include living, but there is no objective goal.
So, you are saying that there are unthinking non-thinkers? Wow!!
Sand, here's an issue. I don't believe that there is an objective sanity. For sanity to exist, there must be a notion of "proper order" or "purpose", and those notions can't exist out there in the universe. So, really, all insanity is, is the label that the "sane" place on those who are unlike them in ways that they consider to be wrongful. So making a demarcation of sane vs insane and pretending it is objective is just to me a sign of an "unthinking non-thinker" to use someone else's notion.
Not only that, but to say that "death is total defeat" presupposes that a person does not have values above their own life, and that their identity is fully tied to their physical existence. If my identity is instead tied to a child(could be parental, brotherly, etc), and if by my death, I save that child, then I have won, there is no question about that. The goal only includes living if you want it to include living, but there is no objective goal.
No. You have lost. The child has won. You can lose to make someone else win but losing is still losing. Sanity is a legal term, not a medical one.
Good for you, that is fantastic!
This means you are a slave.
"No one can make you do anything against your will, not even the government."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvt-xPlj4M0
Good for you, that is fantastic!
This means you are a slave.
"No one can make you do anything against your will, not even the government."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvt-xPlj4M0
But perhaps they can persuade you you will suffer less if you do as you are told. A fanatic masochist, of course, is unpersuadable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1BZhKngBUM
Everyone is free to choose slavery. Mind-you, it gets obnoxious when the whole world goes Nazi.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1BZhKngBUM
Everyone is free to choose slavery. Mind-you, it gets obnoxious when the whole world goes Nazi.
The whole world had its opportunity to turn Nazi and it didn't seem to work out too well.
So in your view, the USSA, Oz, etc is not the largest and most sophisticated police state the World has ever known?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 660529314#
So in your view, the USSA, Oz, etc is not the largest and most sophisticated police state the World has ever known?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 660529314#
Is it either Hitler or Total Anarchy in your view? I can agree that America does do a lot of bad and irresponsible stuff to both it's citizens and innocent people abroad, but "police state" is pretty overdramatic in my opinion.
Anyway, I don't find argument by videos very convincing, if it's used too frequently and nothing is said about what the video is about.
_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
So in your view, the USSA, Oz, etc is not the largest and most sophisticated police state the World has ever known?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 660529314#
The USSA I have never heard of. Oz seemed to be ruled by a fake wizard and was, to my knowledge, no more real than Barsoom or Never Never Land. All states have police that seem inevitably to misbehave. That seems to be a pandemic with police everywhere. That the USA is moving towards totalitarianism seems to me a mere removal of the hypocrisies that have plagued it( or mischaracterized it) from its beginning.