Is there a God, and other discussions with an atheist
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
it affects their lives even if he doesnt exist in force of organized religion having an influence.
WOW that almost sounds like a conspiracy theory to me if one doesnt belive in God why not contribute to things like math science ect the religious will never go away neither will radical atheists hell bent on ridding the world of religion
??
to debate the existence of a god is impossible from a human viewpoint both for religous and non religious people, why should a decision then be based on religion and not reason?
the gay marriage debate is one of these areas,
i think i speak for most non-believers when i say we dont care much about peoples personal belief, only the effect on society.
nor do i think most non-believers would laugh gleefully at the demise of religon or spirituality itself, i for one love much of the architecture religion drives people to make, but do i think this justifies church taxes? (no)
how any of this sounds like a conspiracy theory is beyond me as it is visible in many debates around the globe in full public view.
I do agree that a non believer doesnt care about peoples personal beliefs but they care enough to demonize them for it.
Ok I guess that was a bit harsh of a statement but that was just me speaking my mind
Some religious do agree with some reason to belive in God I see the logic behind it that others dont because they are to skeptical to have a open mind to anything that involves spirituality.
Their is also archaeological evidence in the Torah Bible Quran ect that supports our religious belifes.
I just do not see the logic behind a non beliver debating the existince of a higher power they already do not belive in
Also not all chrisitans mulsims or jews belive certin things about their religion or question some of the stories or the core belifes.
Ok I guess that was a bit harsh of a statement but that was just me speaking my mind
The same can be said about believers.
Some just don't see any indication that anything spiritual exists. You can argue that's because of a closed mind, but again the same can be said about people who see spiritualism in every little thing despite perfectly satisfactory natural explenations being available.
No scientific evidence for spirituality has ever been brought forth. Unless I missed something, in which case I would very much like a link.
It's a curiosity to me. I don't understand why anyone would put any stock in spiritual claims, I understand it even less as our understanding of the universe grows. So I talk about it with people who do believe, sometimes it can get heated but that's just human nature.
That on it's own says quite a lot to me.
_________________
Chances are, if you're offended by something I said, it was an attempt at humour.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Ok I guess that was a bit harsh of a statement but that was just me speaking my mind
The same can be said about believers.
Some just don't see any indication that anything spiritual exists. You can argue that's because of a closed mind, but again the same can be said about people who see spiritualism in every little thing despite perfectly satisfactory natural explenations being available.
Ok I can understand that but I still see it as a way to demonize a religious person if its out of curosity then thats find.
No scientific evidence for spirituality has ever been brought forth. Unless I missed something, in which case I would very much like a link.
Never said evidence of spirtualtiy but they have found archtifacts like the dead sea scrolls.
It's a curiosity to me. I don't understand why anyone would put any stock in spiritual claims, I understand it even less as our understanding of the universe grows. So I talk about it with people who do believe, sometimes it can get heated but that's just human nature.
I think that can be said about non beliver to we think that about non belivers I think both sides do.
That on it's own says quite a lot to me.
Their are certin sects of christianity that isnt ecpeted like Arianism a form of Christanity.
Judeo christians are not well liked by Jews.
Sunni and Shiite muslims are always at conflict with each other.
I like to compare have a religion to the force in star wars
Some nonbelievers don't know a lot about it. Some do. It varies.
Well, the root claim is whether religions are rationally justifiable. Atheists are often the people who argue that ALL religions are not rationally justifiable.(Atheism doesn't entail the claim that no religion is rationally justifiable, but atheists often do believe this on some level) Many religions hold that the religions they disagree with are not rationally justifiable.
The problem is that in some sense there cannot be. I mean, whether a city exists here or there is irrelevant to whether there is divine inspiration, which is the central claim. Nobody sensible believes that the texts have absolutely no relation to history, just the doubts are whether they are reliable for theological claims.
Do you not see the logic of most of the other debates then?? Even further, do you not realize that either way this is presented the non-believer loses? After all, either the non-believer is overly interested in faith, or through disinterest they are now "ignoring the great and powerful arguments for God", and in either situation, the atheist is presented as intellectually screwed up.
True, but the problem is that many of these beliefs are going to be connected in some sense or another, if only in that doubting one belief says something about the reliability of the sources indicating belief is rational.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Some nonbelievers don't know a lot about it. Some do. It varies.
Well, the root claim is whether religions are rationally justifiable. Atheists are often the people who argue that ALL religions are not rationally justifiable.(Atheism doesn't entail the claim that no religion is rationally justifiable, but atheists often do believe this on some level) Many religions hold that the religions they disagree with are not rationally justifiable.
Its justifiable to the religious person atheists shouldnt worry about religion since they dont bleive in it or that they want to they just need proof even if they knew God did existice some would still not worship or belive in him just because they see him with their own eyes doesnt mean they will worship him.
The problem is that in some sense there cannot be. I mean, whether a city exists here or there is irrelevant to whether there is divine inspiration, which is the central claim. Nobody sensible believes that the texts have absolutely no relation to history, just the doubts are whether they are reliable for theological claims.
So the Dead Sea Scrolls where not found sure their is evidience that supports the stories it the torah bible and the quran an that it did in fact take place in history but nothing could support the fact that God is real nothing can only a person that belives lets their faith help them belive.
Do you not see the logic of most of the other debates then?? Even further, do you not realize that either way this is presented the non-believer loses? After all, either the non-believer is overly interested in faith, or through disinterest they are now "ignoring the great and powerful arguments for God", and in either situation, the atheist is presented as intellectually screwed up.
Atheists are smart I will give them that but knowlege corrupts the soul at least thats what I belive.
True, but the problem is that many of these beliefs are going to be connected in some sense or another, if only in that doubting one belief says something about the reliability of the sources indicating belief is rational.
I am a lot like a muslim when it comes to my religion I only talk about my faith with another christian I rarley talk about it with a non beliver they tend to mock me when I do I never mock them for not beliving im only speaking for myself not all religious people.
You're talking about it with non-believers right now and you're not being mocked. Don't let a few inconsiderate jerks who happen to belong to a certain group put you off from discussing something you're interested in with others of that group.
_________________
Chances are, if you're offended by something I said, it was an attempt at humour.
God, in any theology, is like a mind that controls all of reality.
I think mind does control reality to a certain extent. We have the power to, through our own minds, affect the world around us in our respective spheres of influence. Our expectations can affect outcome to a limited degree.
The way I look at God, is its the totality of all consciousness in the universe, including our own. I think consciousness is a whole unaccounted for dimension of reality. The failing of scientific models to account for it would be on par to a whole model of reality not taking space or time into account.
I think mind does control reality to a certain extent. We have the power to, through our own minds, affect the world around us in our respective spheres of influence. Our expectations can affect outcome to a limited degree.
The way I look at God, is its the totality of all consciousness in the universe, including our own. I think consciousness is a whole unaccounted for dimension of reality. The failing of scientific models to account for it would be on par to a whole model of reality not taking space or time into account.
Do you think there is a central point of Will or Control in the Universe?
ruveyn
My opinion is that if God really does exist, I would still refuse him because I think some of the things he does is evil and cruel. Not saying that I would turn to Satan, but if those were truely the only two great beings running the universe then my cynicisim would be further increased in the belief that the universe is just f****d up and that everything is motivated by selfishness and personal interests.
I think mind does control reality to a certain extent. We have the power to, through our own minds, affect the world around us in our respective spheres of influence. Our expectations can affect outcome to a limited degree.
The way I look at God, is its the totality of all consciousness in the universe, including our own. I think consciousness is a whole unaccounted for dimension of reality. The failing of scientific models to account for it would be on par to a whole model of reality not taking space or time into account.
Do you think there is a central point of Will or Control in the Universe?
ruveyn
There may be a godhead made up of ancestor spirits, which our consciousness may merge with upon death, that manifests itself through synchronicity. A lot of people talk about how on rare occasions in their lives, events will line up just perfectly at moments they need it most. I think there may be some type of intelligence, outside the realm of space and time, that's responsible for this and key points in human, biological and cultural evolution.
However, I think people obsess over this too much. I'm more concerned about what I can do, in my own ability, than waiting for God to intervene and do everything for me. I don't think were here for that. Were here primarily to do things on our own and to exercise our own free will within the limitations of being human. A lot of people see this all as some kind of curse imprisoning spirit. I see it as an opportunity to explore our own existence.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
You're talking about it with non-believers right now and you're not being mocked. Don't let a few inconsiderate jerks who happen to belong to a certain group put you off from discussing something you're interested in with others of that group.
Thats true I guess its a lot like being mocked for not liking a sports team everyone else loves they mock you cause your diffrent.
Christanity– Is a Religious Lifestyle.
Jesus did not say, "I have come that you might have religion … that you might have meetings … that you might have a ritual … that you might have doctrine … that you might have this or that ceremony." But He said, "My purpose is to give life in all its fullness."
Jesus says that Christianity is a life. He came to teach people how to live. Until you know Christ, you're not living, you're just existing.
Most people are searching for life; they're looking for it in anything. From one fad to the next, one commercial to the next, that will give me life! They call it other things – happiness, sex appeal, fame, status. But what they're looking for is "What in the world am I here for?" And the church should be the one place in society where people go to figure out how you live. The church ought to teach people how to live because Christianity is a life.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
i dont have an imaginary friend of that name.
also i have only a few serious thoughts on this which are the following:
1 its impossible to know anything outside mathematics and ones own mind, everything else is basically an assumption. im freezing is true. the squareroot of 49 is 7 is true.
2 i find it both necessary and interesting to make assumptions but they should be based on something i can perceive. i believe in lots of theories such as love and the standardmodel. i think of them as more or less likely.
3 i can not perceive or experience "god" in any way. i noticed that quite a number of people believe in "god", but i also noticed that quite a number of people tend to believe in things just because they give them comfort, which is not a valid argument.
4 i would enjoy being able to communicate with an allknowing being whenever i felt like it, i would enjoy being loved, i would enjoy not having to deal with death, i would enjoy being understood without having to talk, i would enjoy knowing that there is some kind of higher order in everything and that there is an objective right or wrong. again, this is not a valid argument.
5 i do not make assumptions for which i dont have at least one argument because this doesnt make any sense to me.
also i have only a few serious thoughts on this which are the following:
1 its impossible to know anything outside mathematics and ones own mind, everything else is basically an assumption. im freezing is true. the squareroot of 49 is 7 is true.
Is statement 1 above true? Is it knowable? If it is true, then it is not knowable. And if it is knowable it is not true.
Do you want to reconsider?
ruveyn