Page 4 of 10 [ 160 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10  Next

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

02 Mar 2012, 6:06 am

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... ingle.html

Perhaps the greatest profile of Breitbart ever written, for those who think the guy was just a ball of rage or something.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,008
Location: Houston, Texas

02 Mar 2012, 7:56 am

http://news.yahoo.com/daily-kos-calls-w ... 11495.html

Ah, WBC...the precise reason why the U.S. should ban religion.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

02 Mar 2012, 10:44 am

43 isn't too young to die. If it were, then we wouldn't be sending 18-year-olds off to die in wars.

If everyone were to make it very far beyond full retirement age, then retirement systems would be in serious jeopardy. People do die in their forties.

His family will be fine--don't waste any time worrying about them. The children will get social security survivors' benefits until they are 18. The wifey will get widow's benefits when she turns 60. Even if the Repugnicans succeed in destroying the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the family will most likely still qualify for Medicaid. A lot of communities have food pantries where they will be able to line up for free handouts every week. Some churches (although probably not theirs) even provide free hot meals on Thanksgiving and Christmas. The children should qualify for free or reduced-price lunches at school. They might even qualify for food stamps or welfare.

It probably would have been more cost effective if President Obama had arranged for the whole family to die together--for example, in an airplane crash. Allowing the Breitbart family to continue to live on government charity (and other handouts) is a rather ironic end to things.


_________________
hyperlexian: "WP is not society"


TM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,122

02 Mar 2012, 10:54 am

Jacoby wrote:
If you want to be mad at someone about Weinergate then be mad at Anthony Weiner for being a creepy perv. Breitbart didn't make him post dick pics on Twitter for the world too see and then lie about it.


Here is what bugs me, Newt Gingrich cheats on his first wife while she's ill with cancer, wants an open marriage when the second one gets sick, yet he is on the morals and values crowd.

Weiner on the other hand, sent some pictures of himself, but he didn't physically have sex with anyone, yet he had to resign. Elliot Spitzer was a single guy who slept with a hooker and he had to leave, yet Larry Craig solicited sex in an airport bathroom and he gets to finish his term.

Why is it that democrats need to leave office while republicans don't?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Mar 2012, 11:09 am

Breitbart was instrumental in getting ACORN defunded. That was useful.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,420
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

02 Mar 2012, 11:58 am

Dox47 wrote:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2010/03/what_is_andrew_breitbart_thinking.single.html

Perhaps the greatest profile of Breitbart ever written, for those who think the guy was just a ball of rage or something.


Okay, he was a ball of rage with self-indulgent humor.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Mar 2012, 12:46 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

Okay, he was a ball of rage with self-indulgent humor.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


That Ball of Rage took down ACORN nearly single handed.

ACORN was a quasi-criminal organization. By rights RICO charges should have been brought.

ruveyn



blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

02 Mar 2012, 12:46 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Breitbart was instrumental in getting ACORN defunded. That was useful.

ruveyn


I'm just puzzled by the world view of people who thought ACORN was in some way nefarious.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm

blauSamstag wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Breitbart was instrumental in getting ACORN defunded. That was useful.

ruveyn


I'm just puzzled by the world view of people who thought ACORN was in some way nefarious.


From the Wiki article:

ACORN was shut down in the wake of the September 2009 release of selectively edited videos by two conservative activists including James O'Keefe using a hidden camera to elicit damaging responses from low-level ACORN employees that appeared to advise them how to hide prostitution activities and avoid taxes.[9]

As I said, RICO prosecution was in order.

ruveyn



TM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,122

02 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm

I think Christopher Hitchens statement on the death of Jerry Falwell is quite apt for Breitbart as well "If you gave him an enema, you could have buried him in a matchbox"



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,420
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

02 Mar 2012, 12:54 pm

ruveyn wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Breitbart was instrumental in getting ACORN defunded. That was useful.

ruveyn


I'm just puzzled by the world view of people who thought ACORN was in some way nefarious.


From the Wiki article:

ACORN was shut down in the wake of the September 2009 release of selectively edited videos by two conservative activists including James O'Keefe using a hidden camera to elicit damaging responses from low-level ACORN employees that appeared to advise them how to hide prostitution activities and avoid taxes.[9]

As I said, RICO prosecution was in order.

ruveyn


Selective editing is right. ACORN had never been prosecuted because it was found that the workers were in fact responding to different questions not pertaining to prostitution asked by that little weasel and his girl friend - who actually never showed up dressed as a pimp and prostitute.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,488
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

02 Mar 2012, 12:59 pm

blauSamstag wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Breitbart was instrumental in getting ACORN defunded. That was useful.

ruveyn


I'm just puzzled by the world view of people who thought ACORN was in some way nefarious.

Any familiarity with the saying "Vote early and vote often"? They were essentially one of 'those'.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,488
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

02 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm

TM wrote:
I think Christopher Hitchens statement on the death of Jerry Falwell is quite apt for Breitbart as well "If you gave him an enema, you could have buried him in a matchbox"

Hahaha, that's awesome. I might have to raise you Michael Moore while we're at it though.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


TM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,122

02 Mar 2012, 1:05 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
TM wrote:
I think Christopher Hitchens statement on the death of Jerry Falwell is quite apt for Breitbart as well "If you gave him an enema, you could have buried him in a matchbox"

Hahaha, that's awesome. I might have to raise you Michael Moore while we're at it though.


I think the reason the right hates Michael Moore so much is because he's pretty much the only left-winger using the same kind of manipulative tools as they are. While some of his documentaries are quite good, "Bowling for Columbine" and "Capitalism: A Love Story" were quite good, others used dodgy rhetoric and manipulative tricks a lot more.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm

TM wrote:

I think the reason the right hates Michael Moore so much is because he's pretty much the only left-winger using the same kind of manipulative tools as they are. While some of his documentaries are quite good, "Bowling for Columbine" and "Capitalism: A Love Story" were quite good, others used dodgy rhetoric and manipulative tricks a lot more.


I once had a 15 minute conversation with Michael Moore. The man is totally devoid of intellectual integrity. He is a willful liar.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,420
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

02 Mar 2012, 1:15 pm

ruveyn wrote:
TM wrote:

I think the reason the right hates Michael Moore so much is because he's pretty much the only left-winger using the same kind of manipulative tools as they are. While some of his documentaries are quite good, "Bowling for Columbine" and "Capitalism: A Love Story" were quite good, others used dodgy rhetoric and manipulative tricks a lot more.


I once had a 15 minute conversation with Michael Moore. The man is totally devoid of intellectual integrity. He is a willful liar.

ruveyn


But the same doesn't apply to Republican propagandists?

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer