snapcap wrote:
abacacus wrote:
Like I said, you're arguing semantics snapcap.
I'm arguing about what is actually happening. It's not possible for you to say you have a non-belief in regarding something you've been exposed to. You may not believe that God exist's so that becomes your belief.
If you atheism means to not have a belief either way, then many things could be said to be atheist, but not you. You've had a chance to think about it and you came to your conclusion. And it may change over time, who knows? You don't go from non-belief to believe and back. That doesn't make sense.
Atheism is non-believe. Sure, you can say it, but it's not the reality of what's going on.
What is your reason for being an atheist? Just think about it. Once you have, then that is your doctrine as to why you are an atheist. It's doesn't justify your non-position. It justifies your position of believing that God doesn't exist.
Snappy,
If you do not understand the difference in the following two sentences, please relearn English rules, then come back and apologize for wasting other peoples time with the ceaseless trolling.
I do not believe gods exist.
I believe gods do not exist.
Atheists do not believe gods exist.
This is literally the definition of the word.
Quote:
unbelief in God or deities
I'll break that down a bit further for you, and define unbelief
Quote:
lack of belief
If you fail to comprehend what that means, that is not anyone’s fault but your own. But defining Atheism otherwise or claiming it is something different than that is incorrect.
_________________
I am Ignostic.
Go ahead and define god, with universal acceptance of said definition.
I'll wait.