visagrunt wrote:
I think there's an important question underlying all of this.
Why is it a race race?
It seems clear that some voters--not just in the United States, but the world over--make electoral choices that are grounded in their demography. Whether it is the votes of women, GLBTs, religious groups or racial groups, people see a personal stake in the outcome of a vote, because at least one of the parties is viewed as inimical to the interests of their tribe.
The rhetoric of "special rights," "the 99%," "war on women," all serve to polarize the electorate. We are sliced and diced a hundred different ways, but we can only make one choice on our ballot.
And ultimately, I think it is insulting. It supposes that voters are too ill-informed, too stupid or too lazy to make a choice based on a complex of national interests, and are confined to voting only on their individual interests.
Voters are too ill-informed, stupid, and lazy, otherwise they wouldn't be influenced by these catchphrases and elect these buffoons.