thomas81 wrote:
pawelk1986 wrote:
Point for her, progressive idea and what it is?
You mean political correctness bull sh**:-)
I even understood her, and as for those members of the IRA were terrorists after all, they not ended in prison for innocence. If she had agreed to the request of one prisoner, they would be another demand, solo accommodation, prison cell etc.
Inmate threatens to commit suicide, and so what? It his / her life, and tax payer money wold be saved:-)
Obviously you've got no understanding of the Northern Ireland context, let alone what was happening during the darker days of the 70's and early 80's.
The IRA/INLA didn't blow up cars and kill soldiers because they enjoyed it. They did it because of a gerrymandering political system that ensured the status quo remained in the Unionist favour. They did it because nationalist homes were only being granted one vote per household. (Unionist households got one vote per resident). Also because protestants were being given preferential treatment when it came to housing and jobs. Thatchers policies were only serving to exacerbate nationalist alienation and hard feeling.
You can't take the imprisoned paramilitaries of either the republican or loyalist side and compare them to prisoners in somewhere like America or England. It is wholly different semantics.
Sorry, I read a little about the Northern Irish conflict, and now I understand more. But still not terrorism, and special considerations for terrorists in prison.
On the other hand my fellow Poles also could be described as terrorists, because members of the Polish resistance movement known as the Home Army did attacks on Nazi officials, German soldiers, Gestapo agents and SS.
A similar situation occurred after the war, my countrymen, organized attacks on members of the Soviet-imposed "government", the Communists called them terrorists and traitors.