It's stupid when feminists say that porn is misogynistic

Page 4 of 24 [ 380 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 24  Next

nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 3:25 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
Porn is just porn—it’s not designed to make you think or shape your outlook on life :lol:


Well I've never had any need for it in my life

I can tolerate the soft porn that seems to turn up in most cable TV dramas these says like 'Game of Thrones' as there is a decent story and the sex isn't excessive. The sex parts are the boring parts to me though; they get in the way of the story.


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,867
Location: London

29 May 2013, 3:30 pm

nessa238 wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

Erm, do you actually know any people?

I don't like porn. I find full-frontal nudity repulsive, I find the thought (let alone sight) of people touching each other's genitals repulsive. However, I know many good, caring, sensitive people who do like porn, and I'm fine with that. Liking porn doesn't make you a monster.


There's zero intellectual content in porn. It appeals to base and animalistic urges. I'll take the person with no interest in porn over the one who loves it any day.
What about a person with zero interest in porn who spends his time at monster truck rallies, versus the person who enjoys porn but also reads Plato and listens to Mozart?



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 3:31 pm

MCalavera wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

All I would say is that people ought to watch the film 'Requiem for a Dream', which depicts the often brutal reality for people involved in the porn and sex industries. If you can watch the last scene of that film and not feel sickened then there's no hope for you in my opinion as it's designed to be shocking and I would put money on all the porn-watchers not batting an eyelid at it as their sensibilities will have been hardened.


I was shocked by the whole thing, especially the old mother ending up being lobotomized. I guess it's because I expected it to have a happy ending but turned out to be the opposite. It definitely f*cked me up, and I actually watch porn.

So no correlation so far between the two.


It was the most shocking end to a film I've ever seen - I was referring to the woman who becomes a drug addict and was forced to perform in some horrible sex show to earn the money for her drugs. The film was the most unremittingly bleak thing I've ever seen and even though I bought it on DVD after seeing it at the cinema for my birthday one year, I've never watched it a 2nd time as it was too gruelling! A person in the cinema told me to 'Shhhh!' for unwrapping my sweets as well :(

I wasn't saying the film itself is like porn, I was saying the film showed the reality of the sex industry and by association the porn industry as well as the two are directly linked.


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 3:47 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

Erm, do you actually know any people?

I don't like porn. I find full-frontal nudity repulsive, I find the thought (let alone sight) of people touching each other's genitals repulsive. However, I know many good, caring, sensitive people who do like porn, and I'm fine with that. Liking porn doesn't make you a monster.


There's zero intellectual content in porn. It appeals to base and animalistic urges. I'll take the person with no interest in porn over the one who loves it any day.
What about a person with zero interest in porn who spends his time at monster truck rallies, versus the person who enjoys porn but also reads Plato and listens to Mozart?


I bet that doesn't happen very often!


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 3:52 pm

Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

All I would say is that people ought to watch the film 'Requiem for a Dream', which depicts the often brutal reality for people involved in the porn and sex industries. If you can watch the last scene of that film and not feel sickened then there's no hope for you in my opinion as it's designed to be shocking and I would put money on all the porn-watchers not batting an eyelid at it as their sensibilities will have been hardened.


Referring to a movie as a way to illustrate the "brutal reality" of something is rather ironic don't you think? Maybe I should refer to the People vs Larry Flynt as my argument lol. I've seen Requiem for a Dream, it's a good movie but I'm not sure you got the point of the movie if what you what you got out of it was that pornography is bad which isn't even depicted as far as I remember. Drug addiction is a terrible thing for those trapped in it and it can present itself in an almost an infinite amount of ways. Likewise, porn is as varied of form of human expression and art form as anything else, do you decry all music because there is music you don't like? Movies because some offend you? Perhaps you would be at home in Saudi Arabia.


I referred to the porn and sex industries and as I said above, the film is based on a book that is based on a person's experience of the real world.

As usual, the essence of my argument is not understood ie from the point of view of how dehumanising and base it all is.
I've come to realise now how pointless it is to argue with people who like porn as to like it in the first place you have to be lacking sensitivity and quality control re what you put into your brain. Porn is not an art form either; it does nothing to illuminae the human condition; it does not lift people up and inspire them. On the contrary it dehumanises and debases both those who make it and those who watch it.

I wouldn't be at home in Saudi Arabia either as a lot of human rights abuses take place there. Porn will always exist where humans do but that doesn't make it a good thing by default. I'd call porn the intellectual equivalent of shovelling sh** into your brain.


Do you think pornography should be banned? If not, you lack the courage of your convictions and probably evidence of some cognitive dissonance. It's funny that you talk about porn being dehumanizing when at the same time you are essentially saying that people that watch porn are subhumans. You have no moral high ground to judge anyone else, your personal preferences are your own. Make an argument that amounts to more "I don't like it so it's bad", "X happened to this person, therefore X happens to everyone" and ridiculously moronic generalizations then maybe it wouldn't be a pointless discussion. There is no substance in your posts, you're ranting.

The same line of totalitarian "my way is moral and right" that dictates life in Saudi Arabia is exactly what you're guilty of here.


"ridiculously moronic generalizations"

You're illustrating my point quite adequately - thanks :)

If you continue to insult me I'll report you


You have no point. If you wish to report me go ahead, that will just further illustrate the weakness of your non-argument. I never insulted you personally, I have made no assumptions about you as a person unlike you. You keep repeating that it's pointless to argue since everyone else is close minded and won't listen when you refuse to respond to other people's points. You are close minded and if your misguided worldview is so fragile and easy to offend then PPR probably isn't the board for you. You clearly did not come on here to debate so if you can't take people giving their thoughts on your posts then you should probably leave.


I've debated my point perfectly well - you're the one resorting to insults and telling me to leave - I'd hardly call that a mature debating style. "Please leave the arena as you're showing me up" is what your replies are tantamount to saying - it's always the same when a person makes an well argued point - people turn on you. Disagree with my points by all means but don't tell me to leave the forum - I think you'll find that's bullying.


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,867
Location: London

29 May 2013, 3:55 pm

nessa238 wrote:
I bet that doesn't happen very often!

I know from experience that it does. I have friends (or at least acquaintances) who straddle all levels of intellect. I have a friend who is going to study PPE at Oxford, another friend who is going to study Medicine at Cambridge, all being well, and they make jokes about porn just as often as people who are going to university to study Sports Psychology or Media Studies at third-rate universities because it is something to do for three years. They're a lot less likely to make jokes about sex though...

Sex drives don't pay attention to intellect, and all people sometimes want "light" entertainment to help them relax.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 4:02 pm

Jono wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jono wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

All I would say is that people ought to watch the film 'Requiem for a Dream', which depicts the often brutal reality for people involved in the porn and sex industries. If you can watch the last scene of that film and not feel sickened then there's no hope for you in my opinion as it's designed to be shocking and I would put money on all the porn-watchers not batting an eyelid at it as their sensibilities will have been hardened.


I'm more interested in statistics and data than I am in a particular film. Yes, I'm sure that whoever wrote the script for that film intended it to shock but that does not mean anything with regards to the truth.


Yes it does actually as the film is based on a book of the same name by Hubert Selby Junior, who had direct experience of what he wrote about

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Selby,_Jr.

"With no formal training, Selby used a raw language to portray the bleak and violent world that was part of his youth."


I looked it up. First of all, it was probably from a time when most porn was illegal anyway, so it has nothing to do with how the sex industry is today. Secondly, the plot isn't even about the legal sex industry and pornography at all but rather about illegal drug trafficking and prostitution. Here's the plot synopsis:

Quote:
This story follows the lives of Harry, Marion, Tyrone, and Sara, who are all searching for the key to their dreams. In the process, they fall into devastating lives of addiction. Harry and Marion are in love and want to open their own business; their friend Tyrone wants to escape life in the ghetto. To achieve these dreams, they buy a large amount of heroin, planning to get rich by selling it.
Sara, Harry’s lonely widowed mother, dreams of being on television. When a phone call from a casting company gets her hopes up, she spends the next few months on diet pills to lose weight. She becomes addicted and soon develops amphetamine psychosis. She eventually ends up in a mental institution, where she undergoes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Harry, Marion and Tyrone become addicted to their own product. Harry and Tyrone are arrested and convicted, sentenced to jail. Harry's arm has become infected from repeated injections, and has to be amputated. Left alone, Marion becomes a prostitute to support her addiction.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requiem_for_a_Dream_(novel)

Seriously, that's the evidence you use to show why porn is evil? Either I'm missing something or you seriously need find out for yourself what the plot of a film or novel is about before citing it as evidence.


I said the porn and sex industries - both degrade the people involved in them and are linked. How do you know every woman who you watch in porn is doing it of her own free will and hasn't been sex trafficked? You can't know but I don't think you'd care either way - this is why all this stuff goes on, because there's always a market for it and the people who like it just don't care. I don't like people being like that.

Porn isn't evil; some people are though and a lot more don't care how the porn is produced as long as they get off.

It's the 'My pleasure is all that matters, sod anyone else's welfare' attitude


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 4:06 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
I bet that doesn't happen very often!

I know from experience that it does. I have friends (or at least acquaintances) who straddle all levels of intellect. I have a friend who is going to study PPE at Oxford, another friend who is going to study Medicine at Cambridge, all being well, and they make jokes about porn just as often as people who are going to university to study Sports Psychology or Media Studies at third-rate universities because it is something to do for three years. They're a lot less likely to make jokes about sex though...

Sex drives don't pay attention to intellect, and all people sometimes want "light" entertainment to help them relax.


You're right and morality is not connected to intellect either.


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

29 May 2013, 4:48 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

All I would say is that people ought to watch the film 'Requiem for a Dream', which depicts the often brutal reality for people involved in the porn and sex industries. If you can watch the last scene of that film and not feel sickened then there's no hope for you in my opinion as it's designed to be shocking and I would put money on all the porn-watchers not batting an eyelid at it as their sensibilities will have been hardened.


Referring to a movie as a way to illustrate the "brutal reality" of something is rather ironic don't you think? Maybe I should refer to the People vs Larry Flynt as my argument lol. I've seen Requiem for a Dream, it's a good movie but I'm not sure you got the point of the movie if what you what you got out of it was that pornography is bad which isn't even depicted as far as I remember. Drug addiction is a terrible thing for those trapped in it and it can present itself in an almost an infinite amount of ways. Likewise, porn is as varied of form of human expression and art form as anything else, do you decry all music because there is music you don't like? Movies because some offend you? Perhaps you would be at home in Saudi Arabia.


I referred to the porn and sex industries and as I said above, the film is based on a book that is based on a person's experience of the real world.

As usual, the essence of my argument is not understood ie from the point of view of how dehumanising and base it all is.
I've come to realise now how pointless it is to argue with people who like porn as to like it in the first place you have to be lacking sensitivity and quality control re what you put into your brain. Porn is not an art form either; it does nothing to illuminae the human condition; it does not lift people up and inspire them. On the contrary it dehumanises and debases both those who make it and those who watch it.

I wouldn't be at home in Saudi Arabia either as a lot of human rights abuses take place there. Porn will always exist where humans do but that doesn't make it a good thing by default. I'd call porn the intellectual equivalent of shovelling sh** into your brain.


Do you think pornography should be banned? If not, you lack the courage of your convictions and probably evidence of some cognitive dissonance. It's funny that you talk about porn being dehumanizing when at the same time you are essentially saying that people that watch porn are subhumans. You have no moral high ground to judge anyone else, your personal preferences are your own. Make an argument that amounts to more "I don't like it so it's bad", "X happened to this person, therefore X happens to everyone" and ridiculously moronic generalizations then maybe it wouldn't be a pointless discussion. There is no substance in your posts, you're ranting.

The same line of totalitarian "my way is moral and right" that dictates life in Saudi Arabia is exactly what you're guilty of here.


"ridiculously moronic generalizations"

You're illustrating my point quite adequately - thanks :)

If you continue to insult me I'll report you


You have no point. If you wish to report me go ahead, that will just further illustrate the weakness of your non-argument. I never insulted you personally, I have made no assumptions about you as a person unlike you. You keep repeating that it's pointless to argue since everyone else is close minded and won't listen when you refuse to respond to other people's points. You are close minded and if your misguided worldview is so fragile and easy to offend then PPR probably isn't the board for you. You clearly did not come on here to debate so if you can't take people giving their thoughts on your posts then you should probably leave.


I've debated my point perfectly well - you're the one resorting to insults and telling me to leave - I'd hardly call that a mature debating style. "Please leave the arena as you're showing me up" is what your replies are tantamount to saying - it's always the same when a person makes an well argued point - people turn on you. Disagree with my points by all means but don't tell me to leave the forum - I think you'll find that's bullying.


You are delusional. You are the one making judgements on people and essentially calling them subhuman. Then you threaten to "report" me when you get called out for it, are you for real? You're not trolling are you? 'Because if you are, then bravo you are a master. If you want to debate me, respond to the points I make in my posts or don't reply, that simple. If you want to continue this conversation, then don't cry when somebody gives you an honest assessment of your postings and threaten to "report" them.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 5:01 pm

Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

All I would say is that people ought to watch the film 'Requiem for a Dream', which depicts the often brutal reality for people involved in the porn and sex industries. If you can watch the last scene of that film and not feel sickened then there's no hope for you in my opinion as it's designed to be shocking and I would put money on all the porn-watchers not batting an eyelid at it as their sensibilities will have been hardened.


Referring to a movie as a way to illustrate the "brutal reality" of something is rather ironic don't you think? Maybe I should refer to the People vs Larry Flynt as my argument lol. I've seen Requiem for a Dream, it's a good movie but I'm not sure you got the point of the movie if what you what you got out of it was that pornography is bad which isn't even depicted as far as I remember. Drug addiction is a terrible thing for those trapped in it and it can present itself in an almost an infinite amount of ways. Likewise, porn is as varied of form of human expression and art form as anything else, do you decry all music because there is music you don't like? Movies because some offend you? Perhaps you would be at home in Saudi Arabia.


I referred to the porn and sex industries and as I said above, the film is based on a book that is based on a person's experience of the real world.

As usual, the essence of my argument is not understood ie from the point of view of how dehumanising and base it all is.
I've come to realise now how pointless it is to argue with people who like porn as to like it in the first place you have to be lacking sensitivity and quality control re what you put into your brain. Porn is not an art form either; it does nothing to illuminae the human condition; it does not lift people up and inspire them. On the contrary it dehumanises and debases both those who make it and those who watch it.

I wouldn't be at home in Saudi Arabia either as a lot of human rights abuses take place there. Porn will always exist where humans do but that doesn't make it a good thing by default. I'd call porn the intellectual equivalent of shovelling sh** into your brain.


Do you think pornography should be banned? If not, you lack the courage of your convictions and probably evidence of some cognitive dissonance. It's funny that you talk about porn being dehumanizing when at the same time you are essentially saying that people that watch porn are subhumans. You have no moral high ground to judge anyone else, your personal preferences are your own. Make an argument that amounts to more "I don't like it so it's bad", "X happened to this person, therefore X happens to everyone" and ridiculously moronic generalizations then maybe it wouldn't be a pointless discussion. There is no substance in your posts, you're ranting.

The same line of totalitarian "my way is moral and right" that dictates life in Saudi Arabia is exactly what you're guilty of here.


"ridiculously moronic generalizations"

You're illustrating my point quite adequately - thanks :)

If you continue to insult me I'll report you


You have no point. If you wish to report me go ahead, that will just further illustrate the weakness of your non-argument. I never insulted you personally, I have made no assumptions about you as a person unlike you. You keep repeating that it's pointless to argue since everyone else is close minded and won't listen when you refuse to respond to other people's points. You are close minded and if your misguided worldview is so fragile and easy to offend then PPR probably isn't the board for you. You clearly did not come on here to debate so if you can't take people giving their thoughts on your posts then you should probably leave.


I've debated my point perfectly well - you're the one resorting to insults and telling me to leave - I'd hardly call that a mature debating style. "Please leave the arena as you're showing me up" is what your replies are tantamount to saying - it's always the same when a person makes an well argued point - people turn on you. Disagree with my points by all means but don't tell me to leave the forum - I think you'll find that's bullying.


You are delusional. You are the one making judgements on people and essentially calling them subhuman. Then you threaten to "report" me when you get called out for it, are you for real? You're not trolling are you? 'Because if you are, then bravo you are a master. If you want to debate me, respond to the points I make in my posts or don't reply, that simple. If you want to continue this conversation, then don't cry when somebody gives you an honest assessment of your postings and threaten to "report" them.


No I don't want to continue this conversation with you. Other people have been able to make their point in a far more reasonable manner. Your posts typify what I meant when I talked about the pointlessness of the debate. Take strong note that hardly anyone/no one else is debating this issue on the anti-porn side - I wonder why? (Hint - it's not because they all love watching porn) - it's because most people have the sense to keep well out of it as the outcome of such a debate is inevitable.

You are quite correct about PPR being of a certain nature. It's definitely home to a certain 'type' that's for sure!

Don't worry little boys - no one's going to take your porn away from you :roll:


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


Vatnos
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 119
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

29 May 2013, 5:12 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Well I don't relate to it and think urges should be kept in check

For example - my urge to eat chocolate isn't kept in check so I'm fat and that's not a good thing
ie excess isn't good; it's better to aim for moderation in all things


The problem with this analogy is that you don't quantify what 'too much porn' is and you don't give a compelling example of what the negative effects of 'too much porn' would be. It's not like your hands get hairy or you go blind. On a personal level there are no bad effects. I look at porn all the time. Nearly every day probably, multiple times a day. When do I officially become a terrible human being?

nessa238 wrote:
I said the porn and sex industries - both degrade the people involved in them and are linked. How do you know every woman who you watch in porn is doing it of her own free will and hasn't been sex trafficked? You can't know but I don't think you'd care either way - this is why all this stuff goes on, because there's always a market for it and the people who like it just don't care. I don't like people being like that.

Porn isn't evil; some people are though and a lot more don't care how the porn is produced as long as they get off.

It's the 'My pleasure is all that matters, sod anyone else's welfare' attitude

Said from the white woman in a first world country, sitting in front of her computer that was manufactured in some 3rd world s**thole, possibly by children. Let's make sure we have everything in perspective here: everything you have ever consumed, everything you have ever enjoyed, everything you need to sustain yourself could potentially have been produced at the severe expense of someone else. This is due to forces far beyond your control. If you lived by the principle of avoiding anything that may have been made through coercion, I contend that you would starve to death or have such a dramatically reduced quality of life that it is no longer worth living. To reuse your chocolate analogy, who do you think picked that chocolate and how much do you think they were paid?

The reason other people in the thread seem to think you're more interested in policing their sex lives as opposed to preventing actual coercion, is that you're only showing this interest when it relates to a recreational interest that you conveniently don't have and that other people do. Someone who doesn't drink coffee or eat chocolate could do the same--accuse everyone else who enjoys those things of supporting some evil industry that hurts a lot of people in a sh***y country somewhere. At the end of the day, it's meaningless words. It's an artificial horse you can sit on.

That's not to say there isn't a legitimate point to be made with regards to sex trafficking or subjugating farmers it's just that your way of framing it is deliberately mean-spirited and condescending. I would contend the problems with all these industries are not the result of indecent desires that human beings have. The problems are more economic in nature.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

29 May 2013, 5:19 pm

Vatnos wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Well I don't relate to it and think urges should be kept in check

For example - my urge to eat chocolate isn't kept in check so I'm fat and that's not a good thing
ie excess isn't good; it's better to aim for moderation in all things


The problem with this analogy is that you don't quantify what 'too much porn' is and you don't give a compelling example of what the negative effects of 'too much porn' would be. It's not like your hands get hairy or you go blind. On a personal level there are no bad effects.

nessa238 wrote:
I said the porn and sex industries - both degrade the people involved in them and are linked. How do you know every woman who you watch in porn is doing it of her own free will and hasn't been sex trafficked? You can't know but I don't think you'd care either way - this is why all this stuff goes on, because there's always a market for it and the people who like it just don't care. I don't like people being like that.

Porn isn't evil; some people are though and a lot more don't care how the porn is produced as long as they get off.

It's the 'My pleasure is all that matters, sod anyone else's welfare' attitude

Said from the white woman in a first world country, sitting in front of her computer that was manufactured in some 3rd world s**thole, possibly by children. Let's make sure we have everything in perspective here: everything you have ever consumed, everything you have ever enjoyed, everything you need to sustain yourself could potentially have been produced at the severe expense of someone else. This is due to forces far beyond your control. If you lived by the principle of avoiding anything that may have been made through coercion, I contend that you would starve to death or have such a dramatically reduced quality of life that it is no longer worth living. To reuse your chocolate analogy, who do you think picked that chocolate and how much do you think they were paid?

The reason other people in the thread seem to think you're more interested in policing their sex lives as opposed to preventing actual coercion, is that you're only showing this interest when it relates to a recreational interest that you conveniently don't have and that other people do. Someone who doesn't drink coffee or eat chocolate could do the same--accuse everyone else who enjoys those things of supporting some evil industry that hurts a lot of people in a sh***y country somewhere. At the end of the day, it's meaningless words. It's an artificial horse you can sit on.

That's not to say there isn't a legitimate point to be made with regards to sex trafficking or subjugating farmers it's just that your way of framing it is deliberately mean-spirited and condescending. I would contend the problems with all these industries are not the result of indecent desires that human beings have. The problems are more economic in nature.


Nice self-justification there

Just keep watching your porn

I feel slimed whenever I enter these debates so glad to leave!


_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

29 May 2013, 5:26 pm

nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
In my opinion there's no point debating this issue with people who like porn, as the very fact that a person likes watching porn indicates a course, insensitive attitude to life in general, hence you are not going to relate to the nuances of the argument or care about what happens to the people involved.

All I would say is that people ought to watch the film 'Requiem for a Dream', which depicts the often brutal reality for people involved in the porn and sex industries. If you can watch the last scene of that film and not feel sickened then there's no hope for you in my opinion as it's designed to be shocking and I would put money on all the porn-watchers not batting an eyelid at it as their sensibilities will have been hardened.


Referring to a movie as a way to illustrate the "brutal reality" of something is rather ironic don't you think? Maybe I should refer to the People vs Larry Flynt as my argument lol. I've seen Requiem for a Dream, it's a good movie but I'm not sure you got the point of the movie if what you what you got out of it was that pornography is bad which isn't even depicted as far as I remember. Drug addiction is a terrible thing for those trapped in it and it can present itself in an almost an infinite amount of ways. Likewise, porn is as varied of form of human expression and art form as anything else, do you decry all music because there is music you don't like? Movies because some offend you? Perhaps you would be at home in Saudi Arabia.


I referred to the porn and sex industries and as I said above, the film is based on a book that is based on a person's experience of the real world.

As usual, the essence of my argument is not understood ie from the point of view of how dehumanising and base it all is.
I've come to realise now how pointless it is to argue with people who like porn as to like it in the first place you have to be lacking sensitivity and quality control re what you put into your brain. Porn is not an art form either; it does nothing to illuminae the human condition; it does not lift people up and inspire them. On the contrary it dehumanises and debases both those who make it and those who watch it.

I wouldn't be at home in Saudi Arabia either as a lot of human rights abuses take place there. Porn will always exist where humans do but that doesn't make it a good thing by default. I'd call porn the intellectual equivalent of shovelling sh** into your brain.


Do you think pornography should be banned? If not, you lack the courage of your convictions and probably evidence of some cognitive dissonance. It's funny that you talk about porn being dehumanizing when at the same time you are essentially saying that people that watch porn are subhumans. You have no moral high ground to judge anyone else, your personal preferences are your own. Make an argument that amounts to more "I don't like it so it's bad", "X happened to this person, therefore X happens to everyone" and ridiculously moronic generalizations then maybe it wouldn't be a pointless discussion. There is no substance in your posts, you're ranting.

The same line of totalitarian "my way is moral and right" that dictates life in Saudi Arabia is exactly what you're guilty of here.


"ridiculously moronic generalizations"

You're illustrating my point quite adequately - thanks :)

If you continue to insult me I'll report you


You have no point. If you wish to report me go ahead, that will just further illustrate the weakness of your non-argument. I never insulted you personally, I have made no assumptions about you as a person unlike you. You keep repeating that it's pointless to argue since everyone else is close minded and won't listen when you refuse to respond to other people's points. You are close minded and if your misguided worldview is so fragile and easy to offend then PPR probably isn't the board for you. You clearly did not come on here to debate so if you can't take people giving their thoughts on your posts then you should probably leave.


I've debated my point perfectly well - you're the one resorting to insults and telling me to leave - I'd hardly call that a mature debating style. "Please leave the arena as you're showing me up" is what your replies are tantamount to saying - it's always the same when a person makes an well argued point - people turn on you. Disagree with my points by all means but don't tell me to leave the forum - I think you'll find that's bullying.


You are delusional. You are the one making judgements on people and essentially calling them subhuman. Then you threaten to "report" me when you get called out for it, are you for real? You're not trolling are you? 'Because if you are, then bravo you are a master. If you want to debate me, respond to the points I make in my posts or don't reply, that simple. If you want to continue this conversation, then don't cry when somebody gives you an honest assessment of your postings and threaten to "report" them.


No I don't want to continue this conversation with you. Other people have been able to make their point in a far more reasonable manner. Your posts typify what I meant when I talked about the pointlessness of the debate. Take strong note that hardly anyone/no one else is debating this issue on the anti-porn side - I wonder why? (Hint - it's not because they all love watching porn) - it's because most people have the sense to keep well out of it as the outcome of such a debate is inevitable.

You are quite correct about PPR being of a certain nature. It's definitely home to a certain 'type' that's for sure!


I imagine nobody else is arguing the other side of the issue because you are in the minority of the opinion which is fine, you can believe what you want. You're painting with a broad brush, you can't just say porn this and porn that since it's as varied as any other form of human expression. Continuing to make such generalizations either suggests ignorance or that you're not really serious about actually having a discussion and in that case PPR is not for you. I'm certainly not a fan of all porn, we all have our preferences and tastes. What one person gets off on might be disgusting to another. Difference being is that I don't judge other people and I certainly support their right to freedom of expression as long as they're consenting adults. It's such a weird to be hung on sexuality, it's just so puritanical but at the same time hardly nobody bats an eye at actual physical violence.



Ancalagon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302

29 May 2013, 5:32 pm

nessa238 wrote:
I've debated my point perfectly well - you're the one resorting to insults and telling me to leave - I'd hardly call that a mature debating style.

You have not debated your point well. What you've done is say repeatedly that porn is bad (as if saying so would make it so); question the morality, intelligence, honesty, and good will of anyone who watches porn (and then complain that you are being insulted!); and say that a chain of vague connections of some type or other are enough to say that two things are practically the same.


_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton


Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 69,530
Location: Over there

29 May 2013, 5:57 pm

nessa238 has agreed to withdraw from this discussion.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

29 May 2013, 6:10 pm

puddingmouse wrote:
There should be a porn equivalent of the Campaign for Real Ale.


Is that so they can be looked upon as out-of-touch, moralising, prudish bores too?