Politically correct people stay out of my threads

Post Reply New Topic

Well what I'm hearing you say (please correct me if I'm misunderstanding you) is that one should use pc as a lie to fish stupid people in (like lets say for a campaign) and then once you've got their support, toss the pc crap aside and reveal to the idiots that you've lied to them. This may work, had it not been for the fact that if you come forward with lies, people will react, possibly violently.
Making people learn to get along and being able to call shots down the middle isn't political correctness, our culture thrives on ignorance, selfishness, greed, consumerism, and hostility, and above all, a lust for power and dominance. Making people evolve beyond that isn't totalitarian, it's merely standing up for what is right, and what is beneficial to our species. The absolute truth seems out of reach to most people, however, a large part of this is also due to propaganda fuelling the negative aspects of human geneticism. Nothing logically gives another human being the "god given right" to oppress or cause suffering to others whom are innocent. Right and wrong is absolute terms is that simple. People need to be guided, or possibly even put into think tanks, to aquire universal mentality. Once they've gained it they will be free for they will have answers that have eluded man for many eons. Then people can be able to live in peace, freedom (with responsible boundaries), equality, prosperity, and knowledge. Further people could work towards a better society, where people look out for eachother rather than looking out for themselves and oppressing one another. The answer to equality isn't political correctness, it's balance. It's finding that middle road. It's moving beyond social labels (except where one is actively discriminated for a biological, and hince, unavoidable difference, such as race, gender, or even nuero-diversity).

I mean if someone makes a decision biasely, theyr obviously not calling things down the middle. There is NO logic in that assumption at all.

But in banning "politically correct" types (please be more precise) you will be avoiding certain forms of conflict, snake321. Oh, other forms of conflict will run riot, but the exclusion of a group who are not even the worst of the various categories of human being on this planet does not appear to me to be particularly rational.

It really shouldn't be as hard of a concept to grasp as people make it. Truth is balancing logic and emotion in a progressive way. Balance. Truth is working towards equality, freedom balanced out with responsibility, unbias, a society without sentient suffering, working towards making a balanced, utopian society possible. Truth isn't in tribalistic behavior, one can only find it in complete individuality and a deep passion for discovering the truth (although it came to me like common since almost once I reached an age of maturity). Truth is working together rather than against one another. The absolute in right and wrong is as simple as "are my actions hurting an innocent sentient being for reasons other than immediate self preservation?" Don't try to be dominant, aim for equality instead.
If people are throwing the truth out and following lies then society will never progress. The answer is in balance. I think alot of western society could learn things from the east.

And of coarse it would be avoiding certain types of conflict. My aim isn't to create conflict, but I won't back down from it either. My goal is to advance the unbias truth.

Meanwhile, seven dwarfs in SS uniforms march by, singing "Heil Ho".

quote]Western society progressed though and eastern society stagnated and that is likely because of Western imbalances. In fact, I would argue that because a natural state of rest will have balance, in order to have improvement some disruption is necessary.
[And of course it would be avoiding certain types of conflict. My aim isn't to create conflict, but I won't back down from it either. My goal is to advance the unbias truth.[/quote] You do recognize that your "truth" has bias in it, at least I have noticed some good amount of bias in your thoughts.[/quote]

Open to question. In which periods was progress only in the West? For most of history the balance has been the other way. Conversely, in claiming the West to be inherently more unbalanced than the east, this negative claim about the west has no more basis than the positive statement that preceded it. Humanity is unbalanced. Whether this is linked to progress (though quite possibly you are right about this aspect at least) cannot be confirmed without a control "humanity" with perfect balance, whatever this might consist of, and seeing whether this led to a similar degree of progress or not.