Page 4 of 4 [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

10 May 2015, 12:13 am

aghogday wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Good questions to ask about this experiment are, and we have seen such scenarios historically like with Babylonians, Egytpians, Mayans, Greeks, and Romans history, is a decline inevitable and if it is, what do we during the decline? Do we just say piss on it and live it up? Do we try to stop it? Do we act like it isn't happening? What are the answers?

If it isn't inevitable and we haven't completely gone short circuit, what is there left to do to alter the current?


ONE thing, anyone can do, with positive energy, is express that energy in some kind of loving expression of human SpiRiT, whether it be words or action of inspiring others.

IF EVERYONE today, starts actually acting the part of the positive change they want to see in the world, instead of complaining about the negative things in the world; the positive energy will be tremendous for every now change.

Obviously, though; we live in a world where some people connect and socially bond over negativity, and others try to inspire others through positive action, in being the change they want to see.

Anyway, no effort of positivity is to small to change the world. And as far as saviors of the world go, I often repeat the following story that I make up as I go, to illustrate that where:

There is a young disabled boy who loves to water a small sapling tree, taking great care of that sapling in all ways he knows and feels he can. That tree grows into a tree that is so beautiful that college educated 'tree specialists' take notes and photos on the unique, and 'strong' tree it becomes. More often though, poets write about the beauty of the tree.

Anyway, one day a shy young man, walking down a sidewalk in front of the tree, meets a sparky young woman, who is eager to meet this handsome shy man.

The otherwise shy man, sees the tree and stops the young woman, and with glowing eyes speaks of the beauty of the tree.

Immediately a spark is made between these two that eventually grows into a tree of love too. And this young woman brings the young man out of his shell, and he goes on to eventually become a military leader, and a great political leader, as well. IN fact, the young man makes a political decision that is recognized as saving most of the world's population from looming World War Nuclear Three.

So who is the savior of the world; this young man; all the friends and school teachers who help this young man when he is in school, his parents who nurture him as a child; the young woman who takes him out of his shy shell; the tree; or the disabled boy who waters the tree.

Well, in fact and feelings, the answer to the quiz IS A RESOUNDING ALL OF THE ABOVE, AS ALL PARTS OF THIS YOUNG MAN'S LIFE COME TOGETHER TO MAKE THE REALITY THAT HE IS in TOTALITY OF LIFE EXPERIENCE.

AND THAT is how GOD works, as basically the BUTTERFLY EFFECT AND AFFECT, IN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE INSPIRING EMOTIONS, WHEN IT COMES TO HUMANKIND.

THERE IS NO POSITIVE ACTION TOO SMALL; THAT EVENTUALLY MAY WORK, IN PART, TO SAVE THE WORLD; THEREFORE, IT IS THE POSITIVE ACTIONS THAT ARE THE SAVIOR OF THE WORLD; FOR WHATEVER MAY COME TO BE IN THE FUTURE; NO ONE PERSON CAN SAY THEY ALONE ARE THE SAVIORS, WHEN almost everyone, in some way, is a supporting player of the entire team of GOD THAT IS ALL THAT IS ALLONE! ON EARTH! FOR NOW!..:)

SO YES, FOR THOSE WHO CHOOSE LIGHT OVER DARK, per positive action verses negative action, THEY ALL ARE THE SAVIORS OF THE WORLD, for as long as humans, other creatures, and the earth, continue to exist.

And there are innumerable ways that one can 'SEND THEIR LOVE INTO THE FUTURE', AS NICELY put, in artistic effort by the great music artist STING, AS WELL; as this song too; will last as long as YouTube Rings this Truth!

Change starts with the human soul felt as heart, and expressed as spirit, ALL in emotional life of human beings.

POSITIVE Emotions, LIKE FAITH, HOPE, BELIEF, AND HUMAN RELATIVE FREE WILL, inspire action and life; to grow those emotions into a beautiful garden of expression, is Love of
GOD, expressed as humans..:)




Very well put and inspiring! :sunny:



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

10 May 2015, 12:20 am

Has anyone seen the Mel Gibson movie Apocalypto about Mayans? I know it's just a movie and it's fictional, but the scenes depicting the Mayan civilization are interesting. I recall scenes of the city Chichen Itza and members of a Mayan cult and they looked literally possessed and were covered in makeup. The movie is about the decline of this city, more or less, or a fictional account of it. Those cult members, now that I think of it, remind me of certain behaviors in the Mouse City. Even though we think of it as a cult and members are acting that way because they are in a cult, it could be thought of as a group that engages in disorganized behavior, kind of like what some of the mice were doing in Universe 25.

What are your thoughts on that? Anyone seen this film and recollect these scenes? One could argue the sacrifice of men to gods is another form of this behavior. It is more complicated than the mouse behavior. It is more like the human version of it.

As the city faced more problems, this disorganized activity, ie; the sacrifice of men to the great serpent/dragon Kukulkan increased and so did this delusion it would cause a positive change and solve the problems plaguing the city.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

10 May 2015, 8:35 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs: physiological --> safety --> love/belonging --> esteem --> self-actualization.

That's how human needs go, and until on set is satisfied, we cannot really go on to fulfill the next set.

In the US, our current welfare system and culture of oppression pretty much keeps poor minorities stuck between physiological needs and safety concerns... So, they cannot really get past that. They're stuck.


I don't blame the welfare system. I blame the breakdown in the parental roles. That is such an important component to civilization and every decade it becomes more eroded. People do not feel like they have accomplished anything without a job of some kind but they cannot have a job and be a parent at the same time. Society demands kids go to school anyway so...what do you do? You have to provide the right environment in the schools to make up the difference. A woman on welfare CAN be a great parent but a lot of times, they are so busy being torn down, they lose all hope and resort to destructive behaviors when they should be treating the role of nurturing parent like their full time job. Their reward is a kid that can function in society when older which is the best reward they could have, right? So much goes against this concept, though. Parenthood is loathed and mocked. If a man or woman stays home with the younger kids, they are thought of as being less than someone who goes out and earns a salary everyday and gives most their time to some corporation. Parenthood is actually the most important role unless you want the mouse phenomena to occur where the civilization declines and dies out. What do you think the main component in that was? Breakdown in the parental roles. It's so obvious.


So, you are not are not wrong about this. The breakdown of parental roles and family structure is a fundamental problem in societal dysfunction. BUT, you cannot stop with that observation. If we want to actually fix things we must answer the question of WHY are parental roles not being fulfilled? WHY is family structure breaking down?

To answer these questions we need to dig deeper. That where Maslow comes in. Maslow's theory gives us a framework to help explain why these things might be happening and also helps us find possible solutions.

A related idea that might explain this breakdown is a concept called "rootshock."

In the past, urban poor could rely on strong family/community support networks to provide help with things like child care, financial problems etc. These networks helped to offset the oppression/discrimination in the greater society. They helped provide meaningful social roles for people and helped the people fulfill those needs Maslow talks about.

I see this in action in my own community. My neighborhood is about 10% white (mostly older home owners), 70% Hispanic (mostly young families) and 20% Marshallese (young families). They're mostly first generation immigrants and there's an extremely strong sense of community. Neighbors know each other, associate with each other and help each other all the time. They watch each other's kids, share food, etc. They even include me. I was completely overwhelmed with all the help I got from my neighbors when my legs stopped working. I've never had to worry about getting yard work done, or help with other occasional household chores that I just cannot do anymore. I doubt I'd be able to get such help in a suburban, white community.

The problem is, back in the 70s and continuing on to today, many "urban renewal" projects have disrupted these communities. Old neighborhoods/housing projects get torn down and the residents are dispersed. Social support networks are destroyed, children are neglected, people are stressed and resort to things like drug use in order to cope, etc.

Again, this stuff helps us explain WHY society is breaking down and that helps us find possible solutions.

If I could offer a bit of constructive criticism... You're curious and you're a thinker. That's good, but it's not enough. Those things help us to formulate good questions, but merely thinking about this stuff is not adequate to provide the answers.

If we want to find answers, we need to DO experiments and research to test our assumptions and confirm how things really are. Otherwise, we end up with a collection of "just-so stories" that won't necessarily help us solve problems.

I think this is a big problem in America. We love to "think things out" but we're too lazy to do the research to actually confirm our hypothesis. This leads to a lot of nutty and wrong beliefs. And it doesn't help us actually solve problems.

If you're really interested in this stuff, you should study it, not just think about it.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

10 May 2015, 8:52 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Has anyone seen the Mel Gibson movie Apocalypto about Mayans? I know it's just a movie and it's fictional, but the scenes depicting the Mayan civilization are interesting. I recall scenes of the city Chichen Itza and members of a Mayan cult and they looked literally possessed and were covered in makeup. The movie is about the decline of this city, more or less, or a fictional account of it. Those cult members, now that I think of it, remind me of certain behaviors in the Mouse City. Even though we think of it as a cult and members are acting that way because they are in a cult, it could be thought of as a group that engages in disorganized behavior, kind of like what some of the mice were doing in Universe 25.

What are your thoughts on that? Anyone seen this film and recollect these scenes? One could argue the sacrifice of men to gods is another form of this behavior. It is more complicated than the mouse behavior. It is more like the human version of it.

As the city faced more problems, this disorganized activity, ie; the sacrifice of men to the great serpent/dragon Kukulkan increased and so did this delusion it would cause a positive change and solve the problems plaguing the city.


I haven't seen the movie, but I have read a few things about civilizations that engage in human sacrifice, like Carthage, for example.

One functionalist theory posits that the reason human sacrifice increases during times of stress has to eliminating the more burdensome folks.

Specifically, the Carthaginians would sacrifice children during times of famine and/or during protracted sieges. On the surface, they're doing this to appease the gods, but at a practical level, eliminating the children also gets rid of what could be described as "useless eaters" during a time of scarcity.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

10 May 2015, 12:42 pm

Goonsquad,
I have been studying John B. Calhoun and his research a bit more. Here's a paper I found useful. Hope you can access it.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/economicHistory/pd ... madams.pdf

One thing this paper discusses is the possibility of anthropomorphism which some have accused Calhoun of. We have to keep in mind, the experiments involved rodents, not humans, so to take the information from the rodent studies, applying it directly to the human population is a form of anthropomorphism and might not be entirely accurate.

Another thing it discusses is that Calhoun, despite all the attention being paid nearly exclusively to Universe 25 and it's gloomy outcome, he did other experiments determining how he could prove therapeutic support for his captive rodent populations. One thing he did was not feed them in the same spot where many of them crowded together since this conditioned them to associate being with other mice and food and this created the infamous Behavioral Sink. He found he could perform simple manipulations that eliminated these overcrowded chambers although the infant mortality rate still festered and was incredibly high, just not as high as it was in the Behavioral Sink chamber.

It is a fascinating subject though, but it is not hopeless. I still advocate focusing on the youngest members of a community because they are the ones that can benefit most from therapeutic approaches like early intervention and the schools shifting from being solely learning institutions to Nurturing Then Learning Institutions. It would require hiring more teacher's aids and they really would fulfill the role of a mother or father, fore example, providing a hug when the child is upset about something. People take for granted how important that is for healthy development. I wonder if the way kids spend so much time in schools without these much needed interactions accounts for so many today who lack nurturing instincts and ability?

I do think the large, project style high rise is the MOST detrimental environment for families and are the source of much desperation in the cities. This is prime example of the inability to form community you see in your neighborhood, Goonsquad, and I suspect you are referring to this type of urban planning as being destructive?

What I think eroded the parental role is the phenomena of over population and something I call the Ruthless Structure, which is like a boundary that sorta dictates certain realities about living in a closed society. It begins with the oldest members establishing themselves, feeling threatened by ever increasing numbers of younger members, and reacting very sternly and harshly toward them, an overreaction, which kind of stunts the younger ones and harms their development. That is just the beginning of the Ruthless Structure. Then you see the other outcomes, one possibility is the insidiously detrimental Behavioral Sink that really consumed and harm a great number of the mice.

Calhoun also talks about Pathological Togetherness, another interesting sociological concept. It just means people want to be with others just to be with them, even if it is to their own detriment. He noticed this in rodent populations in his experiments. They did the same sort of thing. They flocked together in sub groups even if it meant abuse, harm or destructive behavior.

It's also mentioned in the link I provided, the release of adrenaline in over crowding situations and how that can cause groups to ban together, like gangs, for instance, with a heightened sense of aggression. Before I read more, I suspected the bodily chemicals and hormones the rodents released might have also played a role in short circuiting them. Their bodies constantly encountered these chemicals at all times in the enclosure, they couldn't escape them, and this might have had an effect on their mental state and moods.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

10 May 2015, 12:52 pm

GoonSquad wrote:

I haven't seen the movie, but I have read a few things about civilizations that engage in human sacrifice, like Carthage, for example.

One functionalist theory posits that the reason human sacrifice increases during times of stress has to eliminating the more burdensome folks.

Specifically, the Carthaginians would sacrifice children during times of famine and/or during protracted sieges. On the surface, they're doing this to appease the gods, but at a practical level, eliminating the children also gets rid of what could be described as "useless eaters" during a time of scarcity.


The Mayans did not always sacrifice useless members. In fact, I don't know if they did that at all because the sacrifice had to please Kukulkan, or in their minds, it had to. Toward the end of Chichen Itza's aristocracy, they were venturing into the jungle, like what is depicted in Apocalypto, and gathering members from isolated tribes that were no threat to them and didn't impact their survival or ability to gather food. They were even able to persuade some of them to go willingly as a great honor to be "The Chosen" so a deal was made with the tribal elders to provide certain members for sacrifice, sort of like live stock.

When you think about it, human sacrifice is a bizarre concept. It seems detrimental but in the minds of the ones who practiced it, it was a necessary function that would change circumstances, not in a practical way, but by convincing gods that were never actually seen except in the forms of statues ripped straight from the imagination, to give them a break or provide them with good fortune. How can a logical group, which the Mayans did seem to have a lot of advanced technology, reach such a bizarre conclusion, and it's not just them. Do not think I am picking on Mayans by using them as a example. I am referring to all cultures that practiced such odd behavior.

Was the act of sacrifice and the bizarre, inane cults that sprang up around the idea of various entities thought to be supernatural gods part of a Behavioral Sink? We think of Behavioral Sinks as being these crime holes but they could be any kind of behavior that baffles the mind and seems disorganized.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

10 May 2015, 4:34 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Goonsquad,
I have been studying John B. Calhoun and his research a bit more. Here's a paper I found useful. Hope you can access it.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/economicHistory/pd ... madams.pdf

One thing this paper discusses is the possibility of anthropomorphism which some have accused Calhoun of. We have to keep in mind, the experiments involved rodents, not humans, so to take the information from the rodent studies, applying it directly to the human population is a form of anthropomorphism and might not be entirely accurate.

Another thing it discusses is that Calhoun, despite all the attention being paid nearly exclusively to Universe 25 and it's gloomy outcome, he did other experiments determining how he could prove therapeutic support for his captive rodent populations. One thing he did was not feed them in the same spot where many of them crowded together since this conditioned them to associate being with other mice and food and this created the infamous Behavioral Sink. He found he could perform simple manipulations that eliminated these overcrowded chambers although the infant mortality rate still festered and was incredibly high, just not as high as it was in the Behavioral Sink chamber.


Yeah, I'll definitely check that link when I get a chance. The criticisms are dead on. You can't really generalize too much between human populations let alone generalize between animal and human. But like I mentioned before, there are so many ethical obstacles to doing human behavioral research--we gotta work with what we have.

You're also right to point out that all is not lost/hopeless. The whole reason I study social problems is to find solutions that actually work.

Quote:
I do think the large, project style high rise is the MOST detrimental environment for families and are the source of much desperation in the cities. This is prime example of the inability to form community you see in your neighborhood, Goonsquad, and I suspect you are referring to this type of urban planning as being destructive?


So, just to be clear, I provided my neighborhood as an example of a more traditional poor neighborhood that is healthy and does have a strong community. But my neighborhood is not typical in that it is made up of mostly first generation immigrants.

However, yes, you're right about many highrise mega-projects contributing to community breakdown.

If you're really interested in the subject and you have access to an academic database, do a search for "root shock fullilove." Fullilove is the researcher who came up with the hypothesis. Her articles are really fascinating.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

10 May 2015, 4:43 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
When you think about it, human sacrifice is a bizarre concept. It seems detrimental but in the minds of the ones who practiced it, it was a necessary function that would change circumstances, not in a practical way, but by convincing gods that were never actually seen except in the forms of statues ripped straight from the imagination, to give them a break or provide them with good fortune. How can a logical group, which the Mayans did seem to have a lot of advanced technology, reach such a bizarre conclusion, and it's not just them. Do not think I am picking on Mayans by using them as a example. I am referring to all cultures that practiced such odd behavior.



That is a really good point. The Romans were extremely talented and practical engineers. They built highways, aqueducts and surprisingly modern sewer systems. And yet, they were also superstitious enough to allow the behavior of birds dictate really important decisions like declaring war, when to hold Senate meetings, etc.

Just more evidence of human nuttiness!


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

10 May 2015, 6:07 pm

GoonSquad wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
When you think about it, human sacrifice is a bizarre concept. It seems detrimental but in the minds of the ones who practiced it, it was a necessary function that would change circumstances, not in a practical way, but by convincing gods that were never actually seen except in the forms of statues ripped straight from the imagination, to give them a break or provide them with good fortune. How can a logical group, which the Mayans did seem to have a lot of advanced technology, reach such a bizarre conclusion, and it's not just them. Do not think I am picking on Mayans by using them as a example. I am referring to all cultures that practiced such odd behavior.



That is a really good point. The Romans were extremely talented and practical engineers. They built highways, aqueducts and surprisingly modern sewer systems. And yet, they were also superstitious enough to allow the behavior of birds dictate really important decisions like declaring war, when to hold Senate meetings, etc.

Just more evidence of human nuttiness!


Another interesting time period is that of the Israelites leaving Egypt and crossing the Red Sea with Moses leading them. After crossing the sea and roaming, approximately 140 days later, Moses descends from Mt Sinai with two stone tablets (it took a long time to carve stone back then) full of the Ten Commandments which was pretty much the moral backbone of a new Nation, that of Israel. Notice how these commandments address the types of behaviors witnessed in the condition recognized as The Behavioral Sink? One has to wonder, after leaving Egypt, did Moses notice the people he led were devolving into one of these sinks and he saw it would do them in so he had to come up with a way to dissolve it and that is how he came up with The Ten Commandments and it worked.

Not sure if it's just overcrowding that always causes the Behavioral Sink. It seems to be an undercurrent in humans that is discernible from time to time in a wide variety of matters. In some cases it is obvious in locations of overcrowding, squalor, poverty, hopelessness, where the Ruthless Structure is apparent and strictly enforced from the top down. Other times it's not so obvious what has caused it to emerge but we have the results, non productivity, lack of will, lack of confidence, taking the path of least resistance, inability to form a functional society, inability to plan, and behaviors that can result in injury or death to individuals.



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

11 May 2015, 1:12 am

OAnaO, great article.

They went for the money. Changing culture to change behavior was rejected in favor of drugs for symptoms, and putting about three million people in jail.

Our cages have not been rebuilt to be less stressful, or rebuilt at all.

Back when this was written, Detroit, Saint Louis, Memphis, were still functioning cities. There are more, Cleveland, Buffalo, most of Pittsburg, now in decay.

He is projecting a World Brain to save us, we got the internet, with porn and cat videos.

He was right a few times, it was outsiders who built the digital/computer.

It is also on us to build the World Brain. The Old Rats think everyone dying is a good idea.

So do I, but an intelligent population could reduce their numbers.

We still have the problem of bad parenting, with the worse damage being done before age two, which also fits the rise of the Autism Epidemic. He mentions Autism as a response to hostile conditions.

Studies say it cannot be undone, all the Autism Studies have no results. Nurturing Schools would do no better.

Like Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Crack Babies, what is done is done forever. They are minority identified, studied, proven connection. Autism is showing up in upper class educated white families.

The signs that we are rats are all around us.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

11 May 2015, 4:08 pm

Inventor wrote:
OAnaO, great article.

They went for the money. Changing culture to change behavior was rejected in favor of drugs for symptoms, and putting about three million people in jail.

Our cages have not been rebuilt to be less stressful, or rebuilt at all.

Back when this was written, Detroit, Saint Louis, Memphis, were still functioning cities. There are more, Cleveland, Buffalo, most of Pittsburg, now in decay.

He is projecting a World Brain to save us, we got the internet, with porn and cat videos.

He was right a few times, it was outsiders who built the digital/computer.

It is also on us to build the World Brain. The Old Rats think everyone dying is a good idea.

So do I, but an intelligent population could reduce their numbers.

We still have the problem of bad parenting, with the worse damage being done before age two, which also fits the rise of the Autism Epidemic. He mentions Autism as a response to hostile conditions.

Studies say it cannot be undone, all the Autism Studies have no results. Nurturing Schools would do no better.

Like Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Crack Babies, what is done is done forever. They are minority identified, studied, proven connection. Autism is showing up in upper class educated white families.

The signs that we are rats are all around us.


Thanks, Inventor.

You mention Pittsburg, St Louis and Detroit being drenched in decay, with Detroit, particularly bad off but what really surprises me is cities that have seen a revival like New York City when it revamped Times Square with rezoning and Philadephia, which parts have undergone gentrification are actually better now than they were in the sixties. Crime rates are lower. According to the dynamics in Universe 25, those cities should be either worse than Detroit, especially NYC, or just as bad off and yet we see signs they are becoming more livable.

Ever hear of the newest micro unit in apartment housing? Supposed to be about the size of a hallway and about all you can do is sleep in it and maybe fit a television. In Tokyo, they have little morgue like drawers for rent that you rent, open, crawl into, sleep and then leave bright and early the next day. Guess it's no worse than an Amtrak sleeper car though. Time will only tell how such places effect the psyche.

"Medication" is what we throw at a problem when we don't want to take the time and make the effort to solve it the real way, and the hardest one, too. By putting in those (sometimes) thankless, hours without pay, endeavoring only because we know there might possibly be an reward at some date, perhaps way in the future, we take a great risk, relying on hope to see ourselves through. Hope that one day the kids will be able to function in the world, creating a safer environment for themselves and us as well. We believe medication will lower this risk, or perhaps eliminate it, but which is more effective, pills or putting in those seemingly endless hours guiding, holding, cuddling, comforting, feeding, caring, and protecting? If you observe the mother dog, cat or hamster, you know what it takes to raise a litter of young and yet they work tirelessly day and night without a clue of money, status or prestige. The animal mothers are aware of something, in some instances, the human species has all but forgotten. Evolution.

I do believe in the nurturing schools. Right now, there is a huge push in the state in which I reside to put kids in schools most of their lives, even when really young and it could be a good idea if these places were rich in people willing to act as substitute parents. It would mean hiring many aides, putting the kids in small numbered units resembling a family with a kind, caring parent they see everyday only this parent would be the aide the school hired specifically for the role with plenty of training. Ideally, I think this really would remedy a lot of problems and would allow the kids to be better functioning once adulthood is reached. I have faith in it because I have seen how animals raise their young and in many cases it is vastly different than humans which is to the detriment of the species.

The human species isn't hopeless, it just prefers the path of least resistance more often than not.