Would it be better a world without Religion?
Heh, I did go too far with saying Bush is just as fanatical as Osama, I was going to edit it out, but forgot.
TheMachine1
Veteran
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.
The dark ages were a crapped out time to begin with whether or not religion existed. However, you also have to recognize that monks during that time were the ones who still carried past knowledge and kept what we knew alive. It wouldn't surprise me that without religion we would have no need for the monks and thus would probably be worse off in scientific advancement as the barbaric warriors who ruled everything else would otherwise have even less reason to bother with these high ideas.
I think the notion that the dark ages was a time that religious oppression suppressed advancement is largely a myth. I think the word "dark" itself is where people read so much negativity into the time period.
it depends how the lack of religion came about. If it was more or less as in post-Christian Europe then yes, the world would be a better place. But if it was like in Communist Albania then no, the world would be a much worse place. So basically i think it would be good if people stoped believeing of their own accord, but it would be bad if religion were foricbly suppressed.
_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)
El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)
I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).
I always understood "dark ages" to refer to the fact there was little recorded history. The Romans had lots of records. After the fall of Rome there was much less recording of events, but I don't believe it true that developments (e.g. metalurgy) did not continue, just not recorded.
IMO religion is not bad (its just a belief system) but the "Church organisation" of whatever religion seeking to gain and hold power is bad and generally the organisation is incompatible with what they say they believe in.
_________________
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
Strewth!
you should talk to some of the ego-centric mexicans out here in LA sometime. they're huge into christianity.
Proof positive that Christianity causes ego-centrism!
that's not even what i was leading to!
i was simply saying that your ignorant comment that atheists are ego-centric and that christianity leads against such ego-centrism is a load of crap. there's a ton of selfish, as*hole christians just like there's a ton of selfish as*hole atheists.
"Fool" isn't a name? Oh, and we don't all have our own personal spaceships, how tragic. Guess it's not enough that we pollute the Earth with our stinking noisemobiles, are you suggesting we should spread our empire of filth to that useless hunk of rock in the sky?
Care to elaborate? Yeah, I'm willing to grant that "Atheism is a religion" is kind of a trollish thing to say. But can you explain why it isn't? I doubt it.
TheMachine1
Veteran
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.
http://www.physorg.com/news99581802.html
I just got through reading God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens and it's very enlightening.
It's really dry, but I like dry so I thought it was a good book.
Religion is not good.
_________________
Cause we don?t think before we speak
And we don?t stand up for the weak
And we don?t listen to the freaks
Cause we don?t clean up our own s**t
And when refused we throw a fit
As we scream ?I don-wanna-hear-it?
To paraphrase the NRA: Religion doesn't kill people - people kill people.
If religion were eradicated tomorrow, it'd take... ooh... 24 hours before mankind found another excuse to wage war on itself. Lest we forget, some of the greatest crimes against humanity of the 20th century were carried out by largely secular regimes, for reasons unconnected to faith (for example: the Final Solution, the Soviet gulags, the Rwandan genocide, and the Killing Fields of Cambodia), so as much as people have used religion as an excuse to carry out violence against their fellow man... race, culture and territorial/economic rights have all been used just as frequently.
And trying to paint, say, St Francis of Assissi or Mother Theresa as tools of an entirely negative influence on the world is frankly daft. Both of those people used their beliefs as a basis for helping people, and nothing else. Somebody saying "God doesn't want this, that, or the other thing" is usually just reinforcing their own prejudices and using their twisted version of their particular religion as an excuse.
This is coming from somebody who has been drifting towards agnosticism for years, by the way, so it's not like I'm trying to post a rabid defence of Christianity (in fact, I seem to be wandering towards Buddhism at the moment, which seems a far better place for me to be, as it's a peaceful, tolerant religion).
_________________
Why so serious?
I can see the libertarian objections (although I personally don't mind), but any takers?
As we mark this first Malaria Awareness Day, it makes sense to begin with some facts. Every year, more than a million people die of malaria -- and the vast majority of them are children under five years old. It's a sad statistic. In some countries, malaria takes even more lives than HIV/AIDS. Malaria imposes a crippling economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa, where so many are struggling to lift their families out of poverty...
In other words, we've solved this problem before. And the fundamental question is, do we have the will to do the same thing on another continent? That's really the question that faces this country and other nations around the world. My commitment is, you bet we have the will. And we've got a strategy to do so.
Defeating malaria is going to be a challenge, but it's not going to require a miracle. That's what I'm here to tell you. It's going to require a smart and sustained campaign.
And so what does that mean? Well, first, it means distributing insecticide-treated bed nets; secondly, expanding indoor insecticide spraying; thirdly, providing anti-malaria medicine to pregnant women, and delivering cutting-edge drugs to people living with the disease. Those are the four steps necessary to achieve our objective.
Thanks to our leadership in science and technology, we have a unique ability to help in all these areas. We have a responsibility to turn that ability into action. When America sees suffering and know that our nation -- when Americans see suffering and know that our nation can help stop it, they expect our government to respond. Most Americans believe in this timeless truth: To whom much is given, much is required, and I believe in that, as well.
We have a strategic interest in reducing death and disease in emerging nations of Africa. Societies with healthy and prosperous people are more likely to be sources of stability and peace, not breeding grounds for extremists and terror. It's in our strategic interests that we follow through on our pledges.
I launched the President's Malaria Initiative in 2005. Through this initiative, as Laura mentioned, we're spending $1.2 billion over five years to provide bed nets and indoor spraying and anti-malaria medicine in 15 heavily effected African countries. We're working toward a historic goal to cut the number of malaria-related deaths in country by half. The Admiral has got a goal. It's a measurable goal.
(source)
It is because of religion that people feel entitled to what? Oppose Kyoto? I don't understand. There are plenty of religious people who take the religion to me we cannot "abuse God's Earth" hence meaning there should be tougher environmental regulations. On the other hand, if you think those regulations aren't effectively or are needed then there isn't much of a point of supporting them (regardless of religions convictions).
So if religion didn't exist, no person ever would have petitioned the government to set up, say, a social security system? If religion didn't exist people wouldn't feel jealousy, which is part of (along with financial security) where the feeling of entitlement derives?
Does eliminating religion remove human nature as well?
Where does transform form from denial of belief into the type of utopian fantasy that have been so dangerous the physical world in which we live.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Hello world |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm |
Hello World |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm |
This is the way the World shall end.., |
02 Nov 2024, 6:30 am |
hello world
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
03 Sep 2024, 4:03 am |