techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Pepe wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I cannot embrace the idea of a perfectly designed mathematical/physics-based world/universe with implicit order.
The concept is an anathema to me.
A system of such organised brutality disgusts me on a very deep level, intellectually speaking.
What a vile monstrous concept to think that an inherent order of the cosmos could embrace such malignancy and malevolence towards sentient entities.
Well yeah, you could only hope it's not designed and I'd share that hope.
I don't "hope" anything/k.
I endure.
Mate, matey.
Didn't you read the crib notes?
We have no choice in the matter, ergo, "hope" is moot.
Well, hope is a place-marker in the unknown where you try to skew probabilities of what's real for the sake of holding out sanity and mental health.
Trust me, the likelihood of what we're dealing with could be a lot darker. See what I posted in 'Thoughts on God'. I'd strongly *prefer* that human and animal suffering be a sign that either there's no creator or that any cosmic mind has no power over suffering and thus isn't accountable for it but, again, that's me hoping for a universe I personally can stomach.
So, you cottoned-on to my affinity with animal life?
Regarding: "hope".
My nihilistic component doesn't think much of it.
Seriously, I don't do the wishful thinking any longer.
The adage: "Hope for the best and prepare for the worst",
...has transmogrified into: "Prepare for the worst."
I'm a reductionist, as you know.
I'd rather accept what is real/actual and endure the moment the best I can.
On the can, reading the paper, preferably.
May the force be with me to endure!
Regarding: "sanity".
You don't have to be insane to be born here.
But it bloody well helps.
Regarding a creator:
Better hope there isn't one, true dat.
After the end of the universes, the bugger might try it on again. EEP!