Why did Christianity spawn the most evil people in history
salad wrote:
I think the Christianity Jesus taught is a wonderful force for good and one of the greatest gifts to the world. I just think based on my experience in America many white Christians follow a form of Christianity totally divorced from the spiritual message of love and peace and politicize it into a hateful identity politics cult of nationalism that puts many people like me off.
Yes I think Jesus referred to these types as "lukewarm" followers of Christ. They think they are going to a whites-only heaven.
kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Did Christianity spawn violent people or did violent people use Christianity as a tool for their violence?
This Exactly .
if you Consider the Following Behaviours Since Christs Death . I Can Only Assume Bhuddism is the Closest Religion to True Christ Like Behaviour
cbd wrote:
kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Did Christianity spawn violent people or did violent people use Christianity as a tool for their violence?
This Exactly .
if you Consider the Following Behaviours Since Christs Death . I Can Only Assume Bhuddism is the Closest Religion to True Christ Like Behaviour
Quote:
Harada Daiun Sogaku: "[If ordered to] march: tramp, tramp, or shoot: bang, bang. This is the manifestation of the highest Wisdom [of Enlightenment]. The unity of Zen and war of which I speak extends to the farthest reaches of the holy war [now under way].
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_at_War
The Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, exhibited Christ-like behaviour. Or rather, Jesus showed Buddha-like behaviour, if you respect the chronology. But a religion as a belief system for an individual looking for answers and a religion as shared mythology to glue together a society are different things.
500 years ago the monk Martin Luther went public with his accusations of corruption against the catholic church and started his own branch, protestantism, ehich focusses on a personal relationship with god and a more spartan lifestyle. And today Protestants meet in mega churches and the priests collect money for private jets.
A good religious text is like the Bhagavad Gita: it preaches devotion and peacefulness, but can be read as a marching order to exterminate your enemy, loot towns and rape women.
You can build a society on a text like that!
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
But let's be real: Muhammad being in the same caliber and tier as history's worst monsters is a bloody joke. And I mean bloody joke. Even though Muhammad had flaws at least many of his flaws were either common to the time,
To be honest I have no admiration of islam or the arabs for the exact reason you provided.
Think about it, if their philosophy is 1300 years old then the mindset of adherents is dangerously medieval and not with the modern times. Any wonder why so many arab states didn't give up slavery till the 1970s.
One of the only muslims I respect was the late Malcolm X. Through him I understood islamic philosophy (on paper at least) has at its core a universal brotherhood. There are echos of this in the writing of the poets Rumi and Khalil Gibran,
But unfortunately arab racism is no way any better than European racism. I could never contemplate having anything in common with people who claim to be muslims. At least European missionaries bought education/technology to the rest of the world.
I think your going off the media and stuff that’s written and not on first hand experience with arabs and muslims. Nicest guy I met was a Muslim from Afghanistan.
enz wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
But let's be real: Muhammad being in the same caliber and tier as history's worst monsters is a bloody joke. And I mean bloody joke. Even though Muhammad had flaws at least many of his flaws were either common to the time,
To be honest I have no admiration of islam or the arabs for the exact reason you provided.
Think about it, if their philosophy is 1300 years old then the mindset of adherents is dangerously medieval and not with the modern times. Any wonder why so many arab states didn't give up slavery till the 1970s.
One of the only muslims I respect was the late Malcolm X. Through him I understood islamic philosophy (on paper at least) has at its core a universal brotherhood. There are echos of this in the writing of the poets Rumi and Khalil Gibran,
But unfortunately arab racism is no way any better than European racism. I could never contemplate having anything in common with people who claim to be muslims. At least European missionaries bought education/technology to the rest of the world.
I think your going off the media and stuff that’s written and not on first hand experience with arabs and muslims. Nicest guy I met was a Muslim from Afghanistan.
No Doubt .
We Can't Suggest Religion is Wrong or Has a Fixed Result . it's The Use of a Tool Not The Tool itself .
a Gun Can Be Involved in Mass Shootings or it Can Protect the Greater Good of a Community from Destructive Vigilance
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,091
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
To compare the Christian treatment of minorities to the Muslim treatment of minorities is a very ahistorical thesis that no serious historian would ever entertain. No matter how inferior the status of Dhimmis in Islamic lands were they at least were unmolested by the state and allowed to exist and prosper. Christians eradicated their minorities. .
The exact nature of treatment is different but minorities have been "molested" under both type of empires run by christian or muslim.
Your claim that Dhimmis were unmolested in their state is incorrect. Here's just a few examples;
- The prophet Muhammad himself ordered the genocide of innocent jews as retribution
- Turks murdered millions of innocent Armenians
- Egyptian muslims have been harassing and abducting children from coptic families, especially girls
- Pakistani muslims have been harassing hindus and christians, again christian and kalash girls have been abducted
- Iran attempted to genocide of bahais
- ISIS attempted the genocide of Yazidi people
You keep saying christians eradicated their minorities but that simply isn't true (I think you know this). Europeans committed genocide (Australians have a poor record themselves) but they did not eradicate all minorities.
By the same token I support the Rohingya muslims and muslims in Sri Lanka in their fight to survive who have been subject to attacks by buddhist extremists. Buddhism is also supposed to be a religion (or philosophy) of peace. I notice arabs do not care about the plight of non-white muslims.
Just because somebody calls themselves a christian or a buddhist does not make them peaceful
The Islamic conquest was so intolerant to the point it even eradicated most local languages too.
What happened to all other Semitic languages?
All i Will Suggest is 'You' Won't Learn Nearly as Much
About Humans From Books From Different Cultures
As You Will When You actually Interact With them
'In Real Time' Breathing Now; FlesH and Blood Is Yes, Best too...
Both The Bible and Quran Are Hugely Tribal Bloody Books Including
The New Testament From Back to Front too As Again Don't Forget the
Part in Both Books About an All Loving Forgiving Narcissist Like Trump
Demanding Worship And Scolding Any Criticism VARYING FROM 'HIS'
'RULE'/Rules With Penalty
Of Burning
Firing
Torturing
Forever Even
Trump Had No Way
To Match That Story
Of Obvious Ghost Authoring
Psychopathic Narcissistic Leaning Disorder
Of Whatever 'Incel' Then Who Wrote The Story
Who Was Mad At Women And Wanted to Control
Their Reproductive Freedoms Now Calling the Free Spirited
Women, Then Choosing Their Flavor or Flavors of Mates, Eves/Liliths Instead of 'SL8ts'...
Not everyone Has A Personality Disorder(s), Obviously Like The Ghost Author Writers With
Famous Pen Names Like Mark, Matthew, Luke, Or John, Or Just Another Dude Paul Like Any Dude
Named Saul First Who Falls Down Gets Knocked Out And Starts to Have Visions As Such And Writes About 'em too...
Staying In A Cave too Long And Plagiarizing What Was Said before, Taking 23 Years and More Than That (Centuries)
to Get it Put in an 80,000 Word Book Isn't very impressive, to me at least, either with a Limited
Vocabulary of 2000 Words; 800,000 Words in the Other Book Yawn
i Knock That Clear Out of the Park Every 7 Months As such; Anyway
The Other Books
Mostly About
We aRe
The Very
Best Tribe
With The Best
Quarterback And
Last One And Best one too...
Let Me Be clear Again Not Everyone
Has the Personality Disorders of the
Books, The Priests, And Other Politicians Still Controlling
The Stories; Some Folks Are Filled With Love No matter what
SH8T They Get Spoon Filled For At Birth And 'You' Have to Be Totally
Blind (Or Perhaps Filled With Blind Faith Refusing Change to See New)
to See There is Both A Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Jesus With A Personality
Disorder Written into the Bible too; You Don't Turn the Other Cheek, Love Your
Enemy The Same As You Love God And Turn Around (Spinning Your Head Around Like That
Little Girl In the Exorcist Movie, Before She Spewed Green Puke) And Transform those Who
Don't Do It; From a Metaphor of Sheep into Goats in 'Matthew Pen Name' And Burn Them
In Torture Forever unless You are a Literal Psychopath As That Story Would Never Even
Sell Now
If Stephen
King Made It Up
As It is Just too Psychopathic And Horrible...
Of Course Unless You Find Someone Gullible
Enough to Believe That Love is Hate; Love Is Hate; Love Is Hate; ALL A Trinity of Two Statements
of Such in Books; Give me a Break, Love Never Tortures Someone Forever And (Mr. Hyde Jesus) Says He Does...
As Reported By Pen Name Matthew According to Whatever Ghost Author Then Thousands Of Years Ago Made
Up the Words;
That's
Truly 'Inane';
Humans Aren't
Rational Otherwise
Billion of People Wouldn't
Swallow the Biggest Foolish most
Ridiculous Nightmare Lie Ever Conceived By 'Rational Humans';
Ha! That Should Be Enough Without People Actually Believing it! OMG!
Worse Than Any Q-Anon Conspiracy Theory Imaginable Yet Folks Still
Take 'The First/Last Gas Chamber Ride' to Heaven After Death Never Finding it on
(Again 'the Twilight Zone' Episode About the Bible Being A Cook Book Recipe for HeLL ON Earth)
Earth Eternally
Now Where
Even
Science Shows
You Can And Will
If You Do in Autotelic
Meditative Bliss of Flow
Within; Luke 17:21, One of
Few Words of Truth in the Whole DAMNED BOOK...
Make it No Doubt; Both Books Spew The Most Horrible Evil oF ALL;
Not ALL Folks Fall to it; No NOT All Folks Need 'Big Daddy' To Tell Them What
To Do Now; Particularly Women; From What i have Seen The Dudes Mostly Keep
Their Mouth Shut as Love (God) is So Far Beyond Their Purview It Doesn't Even Exist For
Them; Yet For Those Who Breathe Love Free, No Book oF Lies Will Stop The Love Train From
Running Full Steam...
No Matter
Clothed
In Lies
Its Been Housed in DarK Its Whole Life; Light Shines Through
Still Now; Love Wins Yet only 'Win' Love Breathes For Real Now...
Blah, Blah, Blah; when i go (Study/Visit) to Church if the Song
Sounds Positive And Love; The Words Mean Nothing to Me As Soon
As the Sounds Don't Sound Like Love; Exit Out the Left Stage Door i'll Never Return...
Until i Return
to See
If Love
Has Returned Again...
If Love is There, The Words Can
Go to Hell as Far As i'm Concerned...
The Music And Dance Trumps All Lyrics Including
Mine OR Whatever IT IS A 2 Year-Old Child is Singing
About Un-intelligibly In Bliss Or Dance With No Lessons
Nirvana Is Real; All the Words Are Welcome By me to Go to Hell...
As Usually
In Most
Cases
That's 'Where'
'They' Live As Illusion;
Hallucinations We Create, Housed too...
Yeah, Ya Gotta Look Deep Within To Truly Win
This Human Play/Game FOR REAL BREATHING NOW
SeNSinG FeeLinG
Yes
Luke
17:21
For the
Win Yet Sadly
It Offers No Clue How
To Do it; Buddhism and
The Tao On the Other Hand Do
Provide A Song And Dance That Works Eternally Now..
Go South East Asia! Where God (ALL) in Human First Spoke
Written in Sanskrit in Paradise Green With Plenty of Monsoon Rain
to Drink; True, You Usually Don't Find 'God'/Bliss until Ya Find A Garden of Eden
Out of the Desert Within;
And On the Outside too
Hell Yes Location,
Location, Location IN ABUNDANT
BALANCE too Anyway BACK TO SANSKRIT
NOW, 7,000 Years Ago; Longer Than Some
'Christians' Believe The Earth Has Been in Existence; Haha...
SEEK AND YOU WiLL FIND DEEPER AND LONGER NOW iNDEED..
_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI
Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !
http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick
enz wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
But let's be real: Muhammad being in the same caliber and tier as history's worst monsters is a bloody joke. And I mean bloody joke. Even though Muhammad had flaws at least many of his flaws were either common to the time,
To be honest I have no admiration of islam or the arabs for the exact reason you provided.
Think about it, if their philosophy is 1300 years old then the mindset of adherents is dangerously medieval and not with the modern times. Any wonder why so many arab states didn't give up slavery till the 1970s.
One of the only muslims I respect was the late Malcolm X. Through him I understood islamic philosophy (on paper at least) has at its core a universal brotherhood. There are echos of this in the writing of the poets Rumi and Khalil Gibran,
But unfortunately arab racism is no way any better than European racism. I could never contemplate having anything in common with people who claim to be muslims. At least European missionaries bought education/technology to the rest of the world.
I think your going off the media and stuff that’s written and not on first hand experience with arabs and muslims. Nicest guy I met was a Muslim from Afghanistan.
Should have been more specific, I am talking about sharing beliefs with those who take the literal word as fact (so technically practicing muslims), I lived in a muslim country for three years and met some of the best people from all over the muslim world. You know when you meet a "true" musliim because they are taught in mosques to keep away from unbelievers like myself lest I corrupt their hearts.
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
To compare the Christian treatment of minorities to the Muslim treatment of minorities is a very ahistorical thesis that no serious historian would ever entertain. No matter how inferior the status of Dhimmis in Islamic lands were they at least were unmolested by the state and allowed to exist and prosper. Christians eradicated their minorities. .
The exact nature of treatment is different but minorities have been "molested" under both type of empires run by christian or muslim.
Your claim that Dhimmis were unmolested in their state is incorrect. Here's just a few examples;
- The prophet Muhammad himself ordered the genocide of innocent jews as retribution
- Turks murdered millions of innocent Armenians
- Egyptian muslims have been harassing and abducting children from coptic families, especially girls
- Pakistani muslims have been harassing hindus and christians, again christian and kalash girls have been abducted
- Iran attempted to genocide of bahais
- ISIS attempted the genocide of Yazidi people
You keep saying christians eradicated their minorities but that simply isn't true (I think you know this). Europeans committed genocide (Australians have a poor record themselves) but they did not eradicate all minorities.
By the same token I support the Rohingya muslims and muslims in Sri Lanka in their fight to survive who have been subject to attacks by buddhist extremists. Buddhism is also supposed to be a religion (or philosophy) of peace. I notice arabs do not care about the plight of non-white muslims.
Just because somebody calls themselves a christian or a buddhist does not make them peaceful
The Islamic conquest was so intolerant to the point it even eradicated most local languages too.
What happened to all other Semitic languages?
Not in South-East Asia though.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,592
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
shlaifu wrote:
cbd wrote:
kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Did Christianity spawn violent people or did violent people use Christianity as a tool for their violence?
This Exactly .
if you Consider the Following Behaviours Since Christs Death . I Can Only Assume Bhuddism is the Closest Religion to True Christ Like Behaviour
Quote:
Harada Daiun Sogaku: "[If ordered to] march: tramp, tramp, or shoot: bang, bang. This is the manifestation of the highest Wisdom [of Enlightenment]. The unity of Zen and war of which I speak extends to the farthest reaches of the holy war [now under way].
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_at_War
The Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, exhibited Christ-like behaviour. Or rather, Jesus showed Buddha-like behaviour, if you respect the chronology. But a religion as a belief system for an individual looking for answers and a religion as shared mythology to glue together a society are different things.
500 years ago the monk Martin Luther went public with his accusations of corruption against the catholic church and started his own branch, protestantism, ehich focusses on a personal relationship with god and a more spartan lifestyle. And today Protestants meet in mega churches and the priests collect money for private jets.
A good religious text is like the Bhagavad Gita: it preaches devotion and peacefulness, but can be read as a marching order to exterminate your enemy, loot towns and rape women.
You can build a society on a text like that!
In regard to Luther: he actually hadn't gone off to start his own faith, but had been excommunicated by the corrupt churchmen he protested against, resulting in much of Europe north of the Alps breaking away to follow him or other reformers.
The Protestantism Luther had founded is best represented by mainline Protestant churches today (Lutherans, Anglican Communion, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, and others), whereas evangelical megachurches of today have more in common with the Anabaptists and Arminians who represented the radical extremists of Luther's day.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,650
Location: Right over your left shoulder
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
To compare the Christian treatment of minorities to the Muslim treatment of minorities is a very ahistorical thesis that no serious historian would ever entertain. No matter how inferior the status of Dhimmis in Islamic lands were they at least were unmolested by the state and allowed to exist and prosper. Christians eradicated their minorities. .
The exact nature of treatment is different but minorities have been "molested" under both type of empires run by christian or muslim.
Your claim that Dhimmis were unmolested in their state is incorrect. Here's just a few examples;
- The prophet Muhammad himself ordered the genocide of innocent jews as retribution
- Turks murdered millions of innocent Armenians
- Egyptian muslims have been harassing and abducting children from coptic families, especially girls
- Pakistani muslims have been harassing hindus and christians, again christian and kalash girls have been abducted
- Iran attempted to genocide of bahais
- ISIS attempted the genocide of Yazidi people
You keep saying christians eradicated their minorities but that simply isn't true (I think you know this). Europeans committed genocide (Australians have a poor record themselves) but they did not eradicate all minorities.
By the same token I support the Rohingya muslims and muslims in Sri Lanka in their fight to survive who have been subject to attacks by buddhist extremists. Buddhism is also supposed to be a religion (or philosophy) of peace. I notice arabs do not care about the plight of non-white muslims.
Just because somebody calls themselves a christian or a buddhist does not make them peaceful
The Islamic conquest was so intolerant to the point it even eradicated most local languages too.
What happened to all other Semitic languages?
They certainly vanished or were assimilated by some method, but I'm not sure it was by force. Is there documentation of force being used?
The North African Romance language persisted for centuries after Islam conquered North Africa, but it was substantially different than Arabic. Aramaic might have been easier to assimilate because it and Arabic share more in common, if the 'prestige language' influences the 'common tongue' to the point they become largely indistinguishable the long-term result will be the prestige language replacing the common one.
Latin speakers likely didn't need to impose their language on their neighbouring Italic speakers by force, their influence eventually made all of those languages into dialects and eventually they assimilated entirely.
I'd venture that the way Arabic replaced other Semitic languages was due to shared similarities. If it wasn't then how did Iranic and other non-Semitic languages persist?
_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
salad wrote:
However atheism is amoral deductively, because the nature of atheism being simply the repudiation of religion does not by definition offer a moral system. That doesnt mean atheists are amoral, but atheism is amoral the same way the ideology that rejects leprechauns is amoral but you and I as presumed leprechaun rejecters scribe to our own morals.
Atheism is NOT simply the repudiation of religion. That elevates religion to a height it doesn't warrant in Atheist circles. Atheists never believed religion was important enough to need repudiating in the first place. They have their own morals that are based on non-theological concepts of right and wrong, i.e. without any weird beard characters in ancient storybooks needing to be involved.
cbd wrote:
enz wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
salad wrote:
But let's be real: Muhammad being in the same caliber and tier as history's worst monsters is a bloody joke. And I mean bloody joke. Even though Muhammad had flaws at least many of his flaws were either common to the time,
To be honest I have no admiration of islam or the arabs for the exact reason you provided.
Think about it, if their philosophy is 1300 years old then the mindset of adherents is dangerously medieval and not with the modern times. Any wonder why so many arab states didn't give up slavery till the 1970s.
One of the only muslims I respect was the late Malcolm X. Through him I understood islamic philosophy (on paper at least) has at its core a universal brotherhood. There are echos of this in the writing of the poets Rumi and Khalil Gibran,
But unfortunately arab racism is no way any better than European racism. I could never contemplate having anything in common with people who claim to be muslims. At least European missionaries bought education/technology to the rest of the world.
I think your going off the media and stuff that’s written and not on first hand experience with arabs and muslims. Nicest guy I met was a Muslim from Afghanistan.
No Doubt .
We Can't Suggest Religion is Wrong or Has a Fixed Result . it's The Use of a Tool Not The Tool itself .
a Gun Can Be Involved in Mass Shootings or it Can Protect the Greater Good of a Community from Destructive Vigilance
whatever is in a person's heart often gets brought out by religion. kinda scary
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
History of womens work |
23 Dec 2024, 3:12 pm |
History of being a survivor of violence |
25 Dec 2024, 3:43 pm |
The 30 year predatory history of Jay-Z |
20 Dec 2024, 9:20 pm |
Question about my history of depressive experience.
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
09 Nov 2024, 12:11 am |