Which Candidate In The US Presidental Race Do You Support?

Page 4 of 4 [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Slink
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 160
Location: 14 yrs I been sleeping in a barn

19 Sep 2007, 4:03 pm

calandale wrote:
McCain is a f***ing scumbag.


LOL! QFT.

All the slimy reptiles on the right and jackasses on the left are scumbags. I'm sick and tired of them all. Screw them. May as well choose between the Genoveses and the Gambinos. At least they're honest about shooting you in the back.


_________________
Shatner's Bassoon


richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

19 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm

all presidential hopefulls are crap, i feel like im on the home shopping network buying someones dishonesty and fakeness, just so he can be the most powerful person in the universe. especially rudy giolooney, sorry guys no republican is getting my vote



JDiver
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2007
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 11
Location: San Jose, Ca

21 Sep 2007, 12:26 am

I will vote for anyone who can defeat the Marx *err* Hillary crowd. Right now I like Thompson.

Obama? Yeah. Right. A Muslim president? No thanks. Not with that Iranian nut job running around.

Hillary just scares the crap out of me. She is the reincarnation of Karl Marx. She is ant-freedom, anti-American, and anti-Constitution. Edwards is just as bad... Forcing people to go to the doctor every year.... good lord.

Washington and Jefferson, where are you when we need you?



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

21 Sep 2007, 5:22 am

Washington was a p****, and Jefferson
a hypocrite.



TheWonk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 28

21 Sep 2007, 10:23 am

AnonymousAnonymous wrote:
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or John Edwards.


Ditto.



TheWonk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 28

21 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm

JDiver wrote:
I will vote for anyone who can defeat the Marx *err* Hillary crowd. Right now I like Thompson.

Obama? Yeah. Right. A Muslim president? No thanks. Not with that Iranian nut job running around.

Hillary just scares the crap out of me. She is the reincarnation of Karl Marx. She is ant-freedom, anti-American, and anti-Constitution. Edwards is just as bad... Forcing people to go to the doctor every year.... good lord.

Washington and Jefferson, where are you when we need you?


Obama and his family are Christian, active in a Chicago church.



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

21 Sep 2007, 1:15 pm

Which one is least likely to drag the UK into more wars?

Pick that one please.

The more politicians attempt to dictate global policy, the more methinks that global voting should dictate who gets to be a politician. Put simply.. govern your own bloody country.. thats what you're paid for.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

22 Sep 2007, 5:47 am

Macbeth wrote:
Which one is least likely to drag the UK into more wars?

Pick that one please.

The more politicians attempt to dictate global policy, the more methinks that global voting should dictate who gets to be a politician. Put simply.. govern your own bloody country.. thats what you're paid for.


Its not up to them to start wars, its up to the Bilderberg/World bankers who put the money up to get them elected in the first place, once elected they have to do thier masters will.

And you think because you have a choice to vote between two parties that you live in a democracy!



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

22 Sep 2007, 11:01 am

Nambo wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Which one is least likely to drag the UK into more wars?

Pick that one please.

The more politicians attempt to dictate global policy, the more methinks that global voting should dictate who gets to be a politician. Put simply.. govern your own bloody country.. thats what you're paid for.


Its not up to them to start wars, its up to the Bilderberg/World bankers who put the money up to get them elected in the first place, once elected they have to do thier masters will.

And you think because you have a choice to vote between two parties that you live in a democracy!


I dont think that. The UK hasnt got a bi-partisan system. We've got several political parties.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

22 Sep 2007, 11:49 am

I hope for Obama, but will vote for whichever democrat wins the primaries. The republicans had their chance, and all they did was take out the 50th morgage on the country in order to buy a war that we didn't need.

I don't think that there will be an Obama/Clinton ticket or a Clinton/Obama ticket; the one is female, the other black; either one needs the traditional white southern guy as a running mate to keep the screaming bigots from throwing too much of a fit. A woman presidet or a black president, we just might be able to handle; both at once is too much to hope for.



OK_Stone
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1

22 Sep 2007, 3:45 pm

Ron Paul.



BeyondInfinity
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 154

22 Sep 2007, 4:01 pm

who's representing the Philosophical Anarchists? oh wait... :lol:


_________________
"He who sees from the side has eight eyes"


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

22 Sep 2007, 6:50 pm

hillary clinton and rudy ghouliani are both evil.


but if conspiracy stuff is right then hillary is already the winner. she'll come into the office and eventually push to make gun ownership illegal. then we'll be under tyranny and the epicenter of WWIII (or IV if you're one to count the cold war as III).



Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

22 Sep 2007, 6:52 pm

Macbeth wrote:
Nambo wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Which one is least likely to drag the UK into more wars?

Pick that one please.

The more politicians attempt to dictate global policy, the more methinks that global voting should dictate who gets to be a politician. Put simply.. govern your own bloody country.. thats what you're paid for.


Its not up to them to start wars, its up to the Bilderberg/World bankers who put the money up to get them elected in the first place, once elected they have to do thier masters will.

And you think because you have a choice to vote between two parties that you live in a democracy!


I dont think that. The UK hasnt got a bi-partisan system. We've got several political parties.


When can you remember one of these many other parties forming the government?
You can be sure though, that if the Liberals looked like getting in, they would be infulltrated as well, so my point about democracy would still stand.