Whats with the leftwing bent of Wrongplanet?

Page 4 of 16 [ 247 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next

Griff
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,312

16 Apr 2008, 8:27 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Griff wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Griff wrote:
You people and your whining over taxes. If you don't like taxes, cut military spending.


:lol:

Oh-kay...

Isn't that the absolutely primary duty of government -- to protect its citizens from invading forces?
We're not being invaded anytime soon. We're on friendly relations with every country that we couldn't fight off without assistance from our allies, and that's AFTER downsizing the military to one tenth what it is now.


Let me explain to you how Al-Qaida works. It works covertly in order to penetrate civilized nations such as ours. It works through sleeper cells. It works through recruiting peaceful Muslim Americans, through extremist mosques which indoctrinate moderate Muslims and fills them with anti-American rage, preceding orders to blow up this or that American landmark. It's not exactly a new thing; radical Muslims have been wreaking terrorist attacks on the U.S. and the rest of the world on a regular basis. No other major religion advocates global terrorism -- only Islam. Islam has a fatwa on America, whether Griff wishes to believe it or not.
Tone it down, man. Besides, you're making a few assumptions about my views that nothing I've said has given you a basis for.

You can't fight a threat like al Qaida with bombs and tanks, Raggy. The only thing that will work is intelligent diplomatic initiatives. It damages their credibility, which is really the only thing that keeps them afloat.

And Ragtime, be more specific: Islam has a fatwa on Christianity and vice versa. The Jews, as usual, are caught in the middle because, for some reason, they can't keep themselves from regularly being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Or maybe they just have really bad luck. I can believe it, too: this Chinese place my boyfriend goes to (he's Reform, by the way) kept giving him these really bad fortune cookies. He got three of them in a row, and no one else there had this problem. It was insane.

Quote:
Griff wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
How about cutting into all the unnecessary spending,
Sounds like a grand idea! Let's start by downsizing and streamlining the US military. Those dudes generate a lot of expenses.


:roll: I don't think you're aware of the sheer magnitude of money government pours into pork projects every year.
Take a look at these.
Gee, look at the rankings.

http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pag ... porkpercap

New York and California, right there at the bottom with Arizona. Go figure.

I see a lot of blue states in the lower rankings, man.

Quote:
Griff wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
before we get to whittling down the most crucially necessary spending there is.
The US military is an oversized monster that isn't nearly effective enough for the insane amounts of money that is put into it.


One could say precisely the same thing about our public education system, our prison system, and most of the other things big government runs.
Nope. The military's been the biggest pork-pot of them all, man, at least insofar as the federal government.

Quote:
But big government has never exactly been a champion of efficiency, in any field. And the larger it gets, the more it wastes. That's why I'm for shrinking the government to a more sane and manageable size.
I'm actually in favor of the government doing more spending on medical research. Some of the projects on there look pretty reasonable. I guess it's no coincidence that I'm going into the field. My, but ain't I a smart shopper.

The Republicans aren't going to make your taxes go away, Ragtime.

http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm



Last edited by Griff on 16 Apr 2008, 8:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

16 Apr 2008, 8:28 pm

Johnnie wrote:

I would like to bump into somebody someday who works hard for their money and has very little in the way of extra or disposable income as it's called and thinks it's just wonderful the government takes some of their money and passes it around while they never qualify for nothing. I haven't ment such a person yet.


My parents are hard working people working from paycheck to paycheck; they are as liberal as they come. So they must not exist in your alternate reality, eh? :roll: You are so deluded by capitalist lies about how everyone can supposedly be rich if they just work hard enough it's pathetic. I grew up in a poor, economically depressed rural community. Most of the people in my home town worked their asses off all their lives, and have little to show for it.


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

16 Apr 2008, 8:41 pm

Quote:
The bolded part is complete, utter BS. I know a several American citizens who are Muslims are they are all proud Americans and hate Islamic terrorism. How DARE you slander your fellow Americans in such a despicable way.

Calm down there Odin; I've not heard of American Muslims being particularly radical, I have heard of cases in which native born Muslims in Europe have gone more towards the radical side(could just be bad reporting, who knows). Maybe America just rawks at integrating immigrants, or maybe it's possible that there could be recruiting going on within.

Not that I want to feed Ragtime's paranoid rants...


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Griff
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,312

16 Apr 2008, 8:47 pm

Well, raping you doesn't sound like a bad idea at this point, Johnnie. Bend over.



Fred2670
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 305
Location: USA

16 Apr 2008, 8:54 pm

Griff wrote:
You can't fight a threat like al Qaida with bombs and tanks.


Maybe the time has come to use their religion against
them in ways so horrific they have no choice but give
up terrorism. Would you suggest that instead of bombs
it might be better to drop 50 million bloody festering
pig carcasses on Mecca?

Griff wrote:
The only thing that will work is intelligent diplomatic initiatives. It damages their credibility, which is really the only thing that keeps them afloat.


Credibility? Are you serious?
There is no diplomatic dealing with terrorists because
the death cult known as Islam knows no compromise.
Islam must ultimately be crushed and cleansed from
the face of the Earth. Not in the name of Christianity,
but in the name of humanity.


_________________
ALT+F4=Life


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

16 Apr 2008, 8:57 pm

Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
I'm here, the forum is mostly school kids who aren't victims of taxes yet.



yeah, cause anyone who has a different view than you obviously doesn't pay taxes.


yeah exactly, glad somebody gets it 8)


i live in los angeles, ca. i get taxes way more than you do.


short of us both posting nearly everything about our lives, you are just guessing who's tax rate is higher and who pays more overall taxes and who gets what in return for paying.

Somebody could be happy as hell paying 40% income tax and $10,000 a year property tax if they had a 6 figure do next to nothing cake government job 35 hours a week while living in a house they got from their grandparents. They would think the system is wonderfull.


i don't think the system is wonderful and i think there's a lot of crap to cut down on. just, i most likely differ from you in which areas i think need to be cut first.

that and i don't just play the partisan song and dance like you seem to do.


edit: and i make nowhere near six figures.


so income taxes aren't much of an issue than are they ?.



are you kidding me? i get 20% of my checks taken out. that's a lot when you don't make a lot of money to begin with. not to mention the tax on gas and the ever rising gas prices in general.



matrix
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Oct 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 585
Location: between glitches

16 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
I'm here, the forum is mostly school kids who aren't victims of taxes yet.



yeah, cause anyone who has a different view than you obviously doesn't pay taxes.


yeah exactly, glad somebody gets it 8)


i live in los angeles, ca. i get taxes way more than you do.


short of us both posting nearly everything about our lives, you are just guessing who's tax rate is higher and who pays more overall taxes and who gets what in return for paying.

Somebody could be happy as hell paying 40% income tax and $10,000 a year property tax if they had a 6 figure do next to nothing cake government job 35 hours a week while living in a house they got from their grandparents. They would think the system is wonderfull.


i don't think the system is wonderful and i think there's a lot of crap to cut down on. just, i most likely differ from you in which areas i think need to be cut first.

that and i don't just play the partisan song and dance like you seem to do.


edit: and i make nowhere near six figures.


so income taxes aren't much of an issue than are they ?.



are you kidding me? i get 20% of my checks taken out. that's a lot when you don't make a lot of money to begin with. not to mention the tax on gas and the ever rising gas prices in general.


20% plus sales and property tax, so consider about 35-40%. We in the US live on the edge of a jenga puzzle. Whose turn is it?


_________________
You are not submitting the post
The post is submitting you


Johnnie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: green mountian state

16 Apr 2008, 10:15 pm

Sargon wrote:
Quote:
We have had a country for a few decades now that has catered to the yuppie baby boomers and screwed the blue collar working class. Obama might actually get the BITTER fact in rural america is no different than the BITTER fact in the inner city. We have had the Biff & Muffy society for decades and most of america has been left out of the warm & fuzzy life in bedroom communities where life is all about their snot nose children who must get a college degree so they don't end up like THOSE working class people Biff & Muffy have exploited and sold out to get their 4 bedroom 2 1/2 bath yuppie castle away from THOSE people, the flithy dirty working class lowlifes.

The news media goes on and on about religion & abortion as top issues in election. More likely is people are voting their wallets and for rural people they are being cleaned out to support the cities and know it. It's nothing more than a transfer of wealth from the blue collar working class outside the major cities to the low income servants of Biff & Muffy so they don't have to pay the people who clean their toilets,cook their food and in general wait on them hand and foot for chump change, bubba is fully awhere of what is going on and the news media won't dare touch the subject of the raping of the rural population and exploitation of the low income urban populations so Biff & Muffy can live the good life.


A Marxist, eh? If by the blue collar "working class" (I don't quite understand this term considering the Middle Class also has to work, even those with a college degree) you mean industrial production, that sector has been declining for quite some time, and it is for the better (its the same kinda of progress that makes us not a 85% agriculture economy). Aside from that, shouldn't one look to oneself to improve one's situation, not the government? Attempting to make and exploit class warfare may sound nice politically, but in reality it isn't such a great deal for most people. No one is really getting "screwed" or exploited (even if they are paid less and you would like to think it is), and if anything the "blue collar working class" already receive payments from other Americans in the form of Medicaid, EITC, food stamps, other welfare, and the fact that they don't really pay income taxes, but are able to call on the services those taxes provide. Class warfare in the U.S. is really quite irrational all things considered.


people are stripped of their dignity being on government aid.

Quote:
industrial production, that sector has been declining for quite some time, and it is for the better


don't seem to be working too well, the imports are killing the country.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

16 Apr 2008, 10:42 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Isn't that the absolutely primary duty of government -- to protect its citizens from invading forces?

No, it isn't.

I am yet to find out how going out to invade every single country out there increases your safety though.



Sargon
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 207
Location: Fairfax, VA

16 Apr 2008, 10:45 pm

Quote:
people are stripped of their dignity being on government aid.


I'd agree to an extent (and probably not for the same reasons), but would not the "working class" require more government to level the playing field against these evil Middle Class people (sarcasm)?

Quote:
don't seem to be working too well, the imports are killing the country.


The "foreign imports are bad" argument is nothing new, but for some reason people's fears of these imports are never realized. Consumers (which can include domestic producers) benefit from imports by having lower prices, more competition, higher quality, etc. Jobs get shifted around in the domestic economy (a cause of complaint since people only complain about old jobs lost, not new ones created which in many cases pay more), so there are some negative short run effects you could say; however, the benefits greatly outweigh these. In the early to mid 90s, Ross Perot was saying that if NAFTA was ratified American jobs would essentially go to Mexico and the United States would be worse off. Looking at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, you can clearly see our unemployment rate has not gone up after NAFTA was ratified (course it did rise during the 2001 recession, but it is a recession after all). If jobs were truly being "lost" we should have seen a much higher unemployment rate after NAFTA. You can also look at countries that tried to be protectionist, and you generally see a clear failure in that policy (the Latin American attempt for example), and worse product and quality options for consumers (Hindustan motors in India for ex).

I wonder if you have any items that are made in China or a foreign country? If so, aren't you better off because of it? If not, you could still buy clothes for example that are made in the USA (they just happen to cost alot more), so why didn't you?



Fred2670
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 305
Location: USA

16 Apr 2008, 10:48 pm

Johnnie wrote:
the imports are killing the country.


imported labor continues to hurt this country
far worse than imported (Chinese) products

Johnnie wrote:
people are stripped of their dignity being on government aid.


the unending influx of imported labor prides
itself on its elgibility for government aid while
US citizens pay to birth and educate their children
who will one day vote their ethnicity above the
principles the nation was founded on.


_________________
ALT+F4=Life


Griff
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,312

17 Apr 2008, 4:33 am

Fred2670 wrote:
Griff wrote:
You can't fight a threat like al Qaida with bombs and tanks.


Maybe the time has come to use their religion against
them in ways so horrific they have no choice but give
up terrorism. Would you suggest that instead of bombs
it might be better to drop 50 million bloody festering
pig carcasses on Mecca?
Nah, that would offend the Jews. Well, I dunno: the Jews I've known personally eat more pork than I've ever seen a human being consume. Let's see; they get pork when they order from the chinese place, they get pork sausage when they order breakfast in the morning...every single meal, they somehow work it in. I do tend to associate with weirdoes, though.

Quote:
Griff wrote:
The only thing that will work is intelligent diplomatic initiatives. It damages their credibility, which is really the only thing that keeps them afloat.


Credibility? Are you serious?
There is no diplomatic dealing with terrorists because
the death cult known as Islam knows no compromise.
Islam must ultimately be crushed and cleansed from
the face of the Earth. Not in the name of Christianity,
but in the name of humanity.
Nah, it would be in the name of Christianity, alright. That's what it's always been about, man: the towel-heads vs. the ring-kissers. It's all garbage. It's always been garbage. Again, tactical, secular diplomacy would undermine the terrorists more effectively than military intervention ever could. It's like running for political office, only the whole world is the voting population, and we need to get the world to vote for America. People are paying close attention to how we conduct ourselves on the political stage, and our adversaries lay in wait to libel and slander us on any premise they can find. A political slip-up, in this war, is like losing an important battle during a war fought with missiles and submarines. When the US comes across to Iranians as monsters, how do you think this affects Ahmadinejad's less extreme political adversaries?



Hanwag
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 209

17 Apr 2008, 5:00 am

[To put my post in perspective: I am Dutch and political basically central (though I am not following any politcal view blindly. In American terms a Dutch central would be very liberal already. It's a cultural thing.]

I believe there is another reason not yet mentioned here. A lot of Aspies have problems coping in social life and need assistence with things. The rightwing view on this is these people should always cope for themselves and for some people that is just leaving them to their fate. The extreme rightwing view is ofcourse that these inferior people just should not be. The extreme leftwing view is that no cost should be spared to give them the best in life. The first view is immoral, the second impossible, but there are many variations between them. Where in this spectrum one is is related to upbringing, disposition and experience. Having problems in life will influence experience a lot.

This is not just a theory, but what happened to me. My parents are more rightwing here in the Netherlands. As a kid ofcourse you adopt your parents views, so when I was 18 I voted the then rightwing party (since then some real scary parties came; I never voted for them). Later however first I had my own major depression and could not study for a period (I did have a job, but that was just a sidejob). This made me see that the basic view of the rightwing that sick people in general are just frauds was not true. Sure there are frauds but not more than in other groups.
Later I found my girlfriend who is a worse aspie than I am. I am afraid I have to say she can absolutely not hold a job for more than a few hours a week. When she did work as a volunteer for two afternoons it took her 2 or 3 days of rest everytime afterwards. She would really really prefer to be able to work, but she just can't. Therefore I am very happy she gets a so-called WaJong (welfare for young disabled people) so we can afford to live together and I was able to take time off and take care of her. Without wanting to sound dramatic I am not sure she would be alive now otherwise.
Still later my mother got a very bad stroke and is severely disabled now. While my parents have some money I think it's a great thing my mothers salary is partly continued and a lot of treatment is done by the insurance. This enables them to continue the lifestyle they have worked for all their lives.

My girlfriends father died monday and from the inherentence a lot of money will go to the state. Ofcourse she'd rather not pay, that is just natural. On the other hand we gladly pay it because we know what is done with it. The same goes for the taxes I pay. Actually I hate the fact of getting less than I earn, but I love the fact I live in a country where people get the help they need more.

Having said this all, I believe in the Netherlands we go a bit far in all this. The money my girlfriend gets should be enough to live ofcourse, but at this time I think it is a bit more than that (which we gladly accept ofcourse, we're only human). Besides we should do more in making partly disabled people work, but that must come from both sides: there should be more places to work as well.

---

Writing this all I thought of another reason why a lot of leftwing aspies come to this site. What I see around me is that rightwing people have a much harder time admitting they have problems in some way.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

17 Apr 2008, 5:49 am

Anybody with the smallest bit of attention to the way the current Republican administration has screwed up the economy, the national debt, the education system, the ecology, the infrastructure, the support of vital research in medicine and physics, the space program, the tax system, reaction to natural disasters, civil rights, the military, homeland security and probably quite a few others and still remains in support of the ongoing incompetence under the flag of conservatism is, frankly, either psychotic or dumb as a bag of hammers. I may not admire all the programs under liberalism, but I'm sure as hell not a masochist.



Hanwag
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 209

17 Apr 2008, 5:58 am

Sand wrote:
Anybody with the smallest bit of attention to the way the current Republican administration has screwed up the economy, the national debt, the education system, the ecology, the infrastructure, the support of vital research in medicine and physics, the space program, the tax system, reaction to natural disasters, civil rights, the military, homeland security and probably quite a few others and still remains in support of the ongoing incompetence under the flag of conservatism is, frankly, either psychotic or dumb as a bag of hammers. I may not admire all the programs under liberalism, but I'm sure as hell not a masochist.


You are right on a lot of points. But this is primarily a discussion on political sides, not on political practice. Incompetence is not limited to one side or the other. Probably the Bush government has screwed up so bad economy and security worldwide will have problems because of it, but that is related only sideways with his political views. For that reason I'd rather have a competent administration in place that does not agree with me than an incompetent one that does. That is by the way the good thing about the next elections: whoever wins, things will improve :D.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

17 Apr 2008, 6:14 am

The US Democratic administrations have hands pretty much as dirty and incompetent in many ways as the Republicans since corruption and double dealing is as American as apple pie but it was under the enthusiastic Republicans in the late 1920's that unregulated speculation caused the great depression and precisely the same thing happened under the current Bush administration with a helping hand from Clinton in his deregulation which has resulted in the present mess. Neither party is free of guilt or stupidity or greed but it is the major corporations and the financial institutions who are firmly welded to what are considered conservative principles and it is those principles that have underlaid most of the problems that the world has today.