Page 4 of 6 [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

ShawnWilliam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,462

15 Sep 2008, 11:27 pm

it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

15 Sep 2008, 11:32 pm

ShawnWilliam wrote:
it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco

*facepalms*


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

16 Sep 2008, 12:08 am

ShawnWilliam wrote:
it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco


ShawnWilliam either has a terrific sense of humor or he's five years old.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

16 Sep 2008, 1:05 am

ShawnWilliam wrote:
it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco


Image


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

16 Sep 2008, 4:50 am

The Dead Sea Scrolls prove that Jesus didn't exist as a person.
That's why the Vatican repressed its translation for so long time.



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

16 Sep 2008, 5:19 am

LePetitPrince wrote:
The Dead Sea Scrolls prove that Jesus didn't exist as a person.
That's why the Vatican repressed its translation for so long time.


Do they ?


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


Erminea
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,083
Location: Holland

16 Sep 2008, 5:27 am

I am sure Jesus existed or lived but he was just a man. Mortal like you and me. A man with a vision (his vision, 'I'm the son of the man created all things'> duh) and preaching about it. Fine with me and if someone feels the need to follow, tjah, go ahead.


_________________
Solum certum nihil esse certi, et
homine nihil miserius aut superbius.


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

16 Sep 2008, 7:31 am

chever wrote:
What does chromosome count have to do with anything?


diff species have different numbers of chromosomes and share different percentages of genes in common on those chromosomes.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

16 Sep 2008, 7:36 am

ShawnWilliam wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Here's a classic video of Evolution VS Creation


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m9Wabr2 ... re=related


evolutionist's first point: "There is substantial evidence from years of collecting bone samples that give us a great idea of how whales evolved into mammals"

creationist: "that doesn' prove that they evolved from each other, it might prove that we have a common designer"

evolutionist: "FORGET the bone samples, they are meaningless! we have tons of DNA from animals, that are remarkably similar"

creationsit: "humans share the same number of cromosones (sp?) as tobacco.. "

. . . scientist epic fail..


You are not stupid but your post projects a great amount of serious stupidity.

It's not the number only but the similarity of the genes and the viral and DNA markers that we share with the apes. In other term, It isn't the number of chromosomes, it's how they line up.

it's spelled chromosomes, science-man.

.....creationist epic fail.



Last edited by LePetitPrince on 16 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

16 Sep 2008, 8:49 am

Sedaka wrote:
chever wrote:
What does chromosome count have to do with anything?


diff species have different numbers of chromosomes and share different percentages of genes in common on those chromosomes.


Yeah I know

Can you guess how many chromosomes people and tobacco crops share in common, relatively speaking?


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


ShawnWilliam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,462

16 Sep 2008, 2:19 pm

LePetitPrince wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
Here's a classic video of Evolution VS Creation


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m9Wabr2 ... re=related


evolutionist's first point: "There is substantial evidence from years of collecting bone samples that give us a great idea of how whales evolved into mammals"

creationist: "that doesn' prove that they evolved from each other, it might prove that we have a common designer"

evolutionist: "FORGET the bone samples, they are meaningless! we have tons of DNA from animals, that are remarkably similar"

creationsit: "humans share the same number of cromosones (sp?) as tobacco.. "

. . . scientist epic fail..


You are not stupid but your post projects a great amount of serious stupidity.

It's not the number only but the similarity of the genes and the viral and DNA markers that we share with the apes. In other term, It isn't the number of chromosomes, it's how they line up.

it's spelled chromosomes, science-man.

.....creationist epic fail.


I wasn't getting deep into it, I was trying to get people to watch the video for themself, nothing more. Don't take my word for it.



ShawnWilliam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,462

16 Sep 2008, 2:21 pm

Sand wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco


ShawnWilliam either has a terrific sense of humor or he's five years old.


I want YOU to explain why im wrong.



monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

16 Sep 2008, 2:31 pm

ShawnWilliam wrote:
it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco


That's like comparing book sets based on the number of volumes ... if my daughter's "Tell Me Why" series has 22 volumes, does that tell us it is as complex as the Encyclopedia Britannica?



ShawnWilliam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,462

16 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm

monty wrote:
ShawnWilliam wrote:
it has to do with DNA.. the evolutionsit is using the similar chromosomes from humans to apes as an example.. and the creationist is saying that's irrelevant considering humans share the same number of chromosomes as tobacco


That's like comparing book sets based on the number of volumes ... if my daughter's "Tell Me Why" series has 22 volumes, does that tell us it is as complex as the Encyclopedia Britannica?


ok, I misspoke and I think i meant how many chromosones they have in common..



Last edited by ShawnWilliam on 16 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

16 Sep 2008, 3:30 pm

chever wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
chever wrote:
What does chromosome count have to do with anything?


diff species have different numbers of chromosomes and share different percentages of genes in common on those chromosomes.


Yeah I know

Can you guess how many chromosomes people and tobacco crops share in common, relatively speaking?


we would share the genes that would be common to all eukaryotes, as that would be our last common ancestor with tobacco... given that tobacco is a plant... we have less in common with tobacco than say with other mammals and animals but more so than with bacteria.


so we share "common genes" relatively in this fashion: humans>mammals>other animals (like birds/reptiles/amphibians)>plants>bacteria ect.

and that by no means means that species have the exact chromosomal set up.... ie- what genes are found on each chromosome. there is some conservation of what genes are found where, but there are lots of recombinant events that occur within any one lineage of genomes... so even if a species shares genes with another species, they (the genes) can be found on different chromosomes (especially if the gene is found towards the end of an arm on the chromosome). the fish lineage, for example, is really complicated as they have gone through several genome duplications and thus have many chromosomal rearrangements.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

16 Sep 2008, 3:43 pm

i would add also, that it is perfectly plausible for different organisms to have the same number of chromosomes yet be different species. tobacco actually has more chromosomes than humans do but the number of genes we have in common on those chromosomes would still be less than the number of genes we have in common with any another species of mammals (that could even have a diff/same number of chromosomes than we do).

check out this website: http://www.kent-hovind.com/lies/chromosome.htm

it's about a misconception of genomes and complexity. more chromosomes does not = more complex... though it's ambigous to argue humans or tobacco are more complex than each other... we're different. im sure you could argue either way.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl