ThatRedHairedGrrl wrote:
This is true. I would class the nature of mystical experience as one of those things about the 'shape of human nature'. Look at descriptions of them over time, in many different cultures and in people of different belief systems and you find they're overwhelmingly similar. (R. M. Bucke's Cosmic Conciousness is the classic guide, but his attitude is in many ways dated and I'd love to know if there's a similar, more recent compendium of such experiences.)
This would imply that
a) there is, beyond the names and outward trappings of religion, Something Else that is capable of being revealed to the human mind
b) the brain is wired in such a way that healthy people undergo emotionally powerful, but otherwise meaningless experiences that, if their background suggests, they will call 'spiritual'.
I agree that what your mentioning is uncanny, though I do think that can be rather directly linked to being part of our evolving what we call 'symbollic thought', something that catalyzed our development like rocket fuel.
Here are a few of the things I've been thinking about recently though:
1. The other weird thing, if people take a godless reality to its full conclusion; it ends up with the human race committing hiri-kiri. There is no purpose for us, in our capacities, to be here. Our lives have no meaning, life pretty much is pain and dealing with pain, and it seems like we're only still here because we haven't reached that sort of global suicide pact, our values don't coincide with that and in other cases people are still in the mode of "I'm here whether I like it or not, all I can do is try to make my life better and the same for everyone else in this sh--boat". Most atheists today would have disdain for the idea of global self-termination but, the ironic twist, most of their social values and desires for justice come from the secular imprint of the judeao-christian values that they either directly or indirectly grew up with; if all the world religions just ended today, these values would live on for possibly centuries in abstract but, as they dissipated, our societies would unravel.
2. Another thing is our insatiable nature. Our being propelled self-actualizers doesn't make sense in the evolutionary term, particularly with things such as depth or wisdom. To this day I can't say I've seen or even heard of anyone's dog or cat trying to read Tolstoy or gorillas in the wild drawing in caves or conducting funerals for the dead of their tribes. While its understandable that this could just be a branch off of what I said earlier as a coping mechanism and advanced utilization of our symbollic thought, as well as religion when we realized as a culture what we were facing down without it; it doesn't specifically argue for a god, doesn't argue against, but does argue persuasively for our need to believe in a religion or many - that's uncanny in its own right as well.
ThatRedHairedGrrl wrote:
(What really interests me is whether atheists actually have such experiences and, if they don't interpret them as spiritual, what they do think of them...)
I'd imagine they're probably as intrigued as anyone else by them, just that they probably get a lump in their throat as they try to swallow down the fact that - yes its beautiful, its transcendental, its refreshing beyond words; but its pure fantasy. I did that to myself for at least 3 or 4 years of my early 20's.