Question for Christians
Because "God set off the Big Bang" is simpler to understand than "two 11-dimensial branes collided, causing a vacuum fluctuation that resulted in the creation of a 4-dimensional universe"?
... and exactly the same principle that "God created Adam and Eve and all other life" than understanding the science and biochemistry of the principles of evolution.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
Because "God set off the Big Bang" is simpler to understand than "two 11-dimensial branes collided, causing a vacuum fluctuation that resulted in the creation of a 4-dimensional universe"?
... and exactly the same principle that "God created Adam and Eve and all other life" than understanding the science and biochemistry of the principles of evolution.
In short a belief system for people with deficient intellects.
ruveyn
Because "God set off the Big Bang" is simpler to understand than "two 11-dimensial branes collided, causing a vacuum fluctuation that resulted in the creation of a 4-dimensional universe"?
Why is that simpler to understand?
_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
I hope there is a seperate autistic one lol
That way we can have god wars and our one will win because Aspie God > NT God
What I'd like to know is why, if they have such true faith, that some of them get deeply distressed when you point out logical fallacies and gaps in reason within religion, I reckon their minds realise the truth, even if it is subconsciously
_________________
"When I Die, I Rot"-Bertrand Russell
"War does not prove who is right, only who is left"-Also Russell
"Religion is the Opium of the Masses" -Karl Marx, Father of Communism
I believe homosexuality is a sin and that God did not create them that way.
However I think homosexuality cannot be simplified to one cause in every single instance.
For some people I think it is a choice, but for many it may not be a choice to actually have these desires in and of themselves.
We should remember that in and of itself, it is not a sin to simply be tempted by something. Jesus was tempted but was without sin.
What is a sin is if you act on an evil desire, even if it means meditating on it for a minute.
And that is always a choice, although can be hard to resist for someone who feels that way.
That's a bit of a narrow-minded view. Be careful because you're walking on thin ice here and you may deeply offend some WP members.
Warning: This might offend if you're particularly religious. Apologies in advance.
IMHO, Jesus sinned against his parents when he ran off aged 12 and disappeared for days without telling them where he'd been because that's dishonouring one's parents.
Also, if you assume that Suicide is a sin because it's close to "Thy shalt not kill" then technically, Jesus "committed suicide" on the cross because he knew what was coming but did not speak. He did nothing to alter the course of history. Had he cured a sick person in front of Herod, he would have been set free.
Thou shalt not covet they neighbours goods/wife
covet... not actually TAKE. You don't need to act for something to be a Sin.
Not everything leads us to a sensible choice. If someone is running towards your child with a knife (and intent to kill) and the only way to save your baby in time - is via a limited choice (eg: a gun), why would it be a sin to make a choice to swap one evil life for one that hasn't had a chance to live.
However I think homosexuality cannot be simplified to one cause in every single instance.
For some people I think it is a choice, but for many it may not be a choice to actually have these desires in and of themselves.
We should remember that in and of itself, it is not a sin to simply be tempted by something. Jesus was tempted but was without sin.
What is a sin is if you act on an evil desire, even if it means meditating on it for a minute.
And that is always a choice, although can be hard to resist for someone who feels that way.
I don't think free will or choice applies in an omniscient entity, after all, firstly he supposedly created us, which means that we were already destined for hell, he'd shoved a bundle of us their already, because if the god of classical theism exists then neither you, me or any others have free will, because god created us and knew what we would do before we do it, what a nice supposedly omnibenevolent entity.......
Which means that us poor atheists had no choice and couldn't help but think rationally, meaning we were going to hell before we even had a choice, curse you god of classical theism
_________________
"When I Die, I Rot"-Bertrand Russell
"War does not prove who is right, only who is left"-Also Russell
"Religion is the Opium of the Masses" -Karl Marx, Father of Communism
However I think homosexuality cannot be simplified to one cause in every single instance.
For some people I think it is a choice, but for many it may not be a choice to actually have these desires in and of themselves.
We should remember that in and of itself, it is not a sin to simply be tempted by something. Jesus was tempted but was without sin.
What is a sin is if you act on an evil desire, even if it means meditating on it for a minute.
And that is always a choice, although can be hard to resist for someone who feels that way.
I don't think free will or choice applies in an omniscient entity, after all, firstly he supposedly created us, which means that we were already destined for hell, he'd shoved a bundle of us their already, because if the god of classical theism exists then neither you, me or any others have free will, because god created us and knew what we would do before we do it, what a nice supposedly omnibenevolent entity.......
Which means that us poor atheists had no choice and couldn't help but think rationally, meaning we were going to hell before we even had a choice, curse you god of classical theism
Exactly, there is no free will in a universe with an omniscient diety. It's contradictory.
_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
However I think homosexuality cannot be simplified to one cause in every single instance.
For some people I think it is a choice, but for many it may not be a choice to actually have these desires in and of themselves.
We should remember that in and of itself, it is not a sin to simply be tempted by something. Jesus was tempted but was without sin.
What is a sin is if you act on an evil desire, even if it means meditating on it for a minute.
And that is always a choice, although can be hard to resist for someone who feels that way.
I don't think free will or choice applies in an omniscient entity, after all, firstly he supposedly created us, which means that we were already destined for hell, he'd shoved a bundle of us their already, because if the god of classical theism exists then neither you, me or any others have free will, because god created us and knew what we would do before we do it, what a nice supposedly omnibenevolent entity.......
Which means that us poor atheists had no choice and couldn't help but think rationally, meaning we were going to hell before we even had a choice, curse you god of classical theism
Exactly, there is no free will in a universe with an omniscient diety. It's contradictory.
Thank you
_________________
"When I Die, I Rot"-Bertrand Russell
"War does not prove who is right, only who is left"-Also Russell
"Religion is the Opium of the Masses" -Karl Marx, Father of Communism
However I think homosexuality cannot be simplified to one cause in every single instance.
For some people I think it is a choice, but for many it may not be a choice to actually have these desires in and of themselves.
We should remember that in and of itself, it is not a sin to simply be tempted by something. Jesus was tempted but was without sin.
What is a sin is if you act on an evil desire, even if it means meditating on it for a minute.
And that is always a choice, although can be hard to resist for someone who feels that way.
I don't think free will or choice applies in an omniscient entity, after all, firstly he supposedly created us, which means that we were already destined for hell, he'd shoved a bundle of us their already, because if the god of classical theism exists then neither you, me or any others have free will, because god created us and knew what we would do before we do it, what a nice supposedly omnibenevolent entity.......
Which means that us poor atheists had no choice and couldn't help but think rationally, meaning we were going to hell before we even had a choice, curse you god of classical theism
Exactly, there is no free will in a universe with an omniscient diety. It's contradictory.
Thank you
It is not necessary to have an omniscient deity for a lack of free will. Any consideration of free will at all will reveal it is a useless capability. Decisions, to be effective, must always respond to circumstance and assumed consequences.
Being homosexual is not a sin, in and of itself. The homsexual act, however is. Homosexuals choose whether or not to sin, just as much as heterosexuals choose whether or not to sin, by having sex out of marriage.
However I think homosexuality cannot be simplified to one cause in every single instance.
For some people I think it is a choice, but for many it may not be a choice to actually have these desires in and of themselves.
We should remember that in and of itself, it is not a sin to simply be tempted by something. Jesus was tempted but was without sin.
What is a sin is if you act on an evil desire, even if it means meditating on it for a minute.
And that is always a choice, although can be hard to resist for someone who feels that way.
Homosexuality is a sin to you because it cannot result in procreation. One of the most effective ways to propagate a meme is for those who are affected by it to have as many children as possible and condition their children to have blind faith in this meme.
How would he get Mary pregnant?
Momoms believe that god had actual sex with Mary, so I guess at least they believe god is male.
Anyway if there is a god, I highly doubt that we appear in god's image, the people who made up the bible probably wrote that becasue they lacked imagination
I doubt religious people take the creation of Jesus to have taken place in the normal sexual manner.
You forget: Jesus was not "created" according the church: "And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father;" (Creed of Nicene).
To bring logic into this sophistic formula is beyond my means ...
Just for the sake of completion - there is the Catholic idea which does not declare homosexuality as a sin, but the homosexual act:
2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,140 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."141 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
So the Vatican, High Lord and Master of The "Sophisticated" Word, thinks it is Ok to be gay, so fare you not having sex ...
I think you need more one twist in the brain to see this as logic, but how need logic if you have the Pope.
Source: Catechism of the Catholic Church
Just for the sake of completion - there is the Catholic idea which does not declare homosexuality as a sin, but the homosexual act:
2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,140 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."141 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
So the Vatican, High Lord and Master of The "Sophisticated" Word, thinks it is Ok to be gay, so fare you not having sex ...
I think you need more one twist in the brain to see this as logic, but how need logic if you have the Pope.
Source: Catechism of the Catholic Church
What do you find unclear about it?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Grammar question |
30 Dec 2024, 7:14 pm |
Question about my history of depressive experience.
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
09 Nov 2024, 12:11 am |
Mario Kart: Bowser's Challenge question |
06 Jan 2025, 12:42 am |
Math question supposed to reveal if someone is autistic |
05 Dec 2024, 1:45 am |