gnossienne wrote:
I present to you apparently the most unpopular political view ever.
We're not really doing that bad.
Objectively speaking, we live in the most peaceful, wealthy and productive time in the history of the planet.
But for some reason, everyone seems to be easily convinced by the idea that "The World Is Going To Hell In A Handbasket."
I also support an unconditional basic income guarantee, that does not go away once you start earning more money, because it's the only way to get the inherently massive amount of wealth America has to circulate.
We have so much wealth and production, it's not even funny. The only problem is that the most basic citizen does not have sufficient credit to circulate this wealth and stimulate the economy. I'm not proposing socialism, where the state controls the industries directly. I'm merely stating that the citizen needs to be guaranteed a certain potential to circulate wealth beyond the wage they can get on their own.
We are approaching a time in which any labor short of a Bachelor's Degree is unneeded as automation and efficiency skyrockets from technological growth. It is therefore necessary to give the hordes of future unemployed the ability to still purchase things to prevent the economy from locking up.
It's sad that this is an unpopular view as you are correct about everything you say. The only thing I would add is that even some jobs requiring a bachelors degree will be taken over by technology advances. 3-D printing is also a major disruptive force in the economy. Algorithms are getting better as we speak. They will continue taking jobs from white collar workers as they have already begun doing. That only takes into account the technology we currently know about. Future advances may well be more disruptive. Lastly, the reason many view the world as going to hell in a hand basket is because of the 24/7 news that lives by the credo of if it bleeds, it leads. Combine that with the same horrific news story being repeated over several days with information we already know from the first time it was broadcast. Low information voters don't understand the effect this has on the human psyche.