Page 5 of 5 [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

NobelCynic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 600
Location: New Jersey, U.S.A.

29 Apr 2010, 4:11 pm

AngelRho wrote:
King James English in this period of history is just bad for the eyes and the head.

And if you want more modern speech you can have it in Lol Cat
Quote:
37 Sum farisee inturuptd Jebus agin and axd him oveh 4 d kibbulz.38 De farisee wundrd y Jebus not kleen hiz whiskrz b4 eatin.

39 Jebus sed, "u farisees be silleh kittehs. srsly. Y u kleen outzide but r all stinkee inzide?40 Stoopid kittehs. Ceiling cat made ur outzide and inzide 2.41 If u b gud n kleen in ur inzidez, u b gud n kleen all over. Rly!42 But i be scoldin u, farisee! Ur 2 stinjee wid ur kibbulz and never givez cuddlez. Bad kittehs. Srsly.43 Scold u agin, fariseez! U alwayz be takin de top purch on da kitteh condo. Never b sharin wid de other kittehs.44 U b like a coffd up hayrball dat udderz step in and go ick."

45 Den da lawyer kittehz start gettin uffendd. "Jebus, u hurtz owr feelingz!" dey sed.

46 Jebus sed 2 dem, "Ur bad kittehs 2! Srsly! U make udder kittehz problums worse, not bettrs.47 Scold u, kittehz. Ur daddeez wer meen 2.48 N u b taken afteh bad daddeez instd of gud ceiling cat dadee."

49 Ceiling cat sed, n he wuz rite, ‘I will send dem the smrt kittehs, but de bad kittehs will prbly b meen to dem.'50 Dis litter of kittehs mite have to kleen up deh bad daddeez messez. Meen kittehz r meen. Srsly.51 Yep. I tink so.52 Bad lawyur kittehz 4 keepin udder kittehz down."

53 Jebus tride to leev deh meen kittehz, but they wud not leev him alone.54 Deh wuz alwayz watchin him, hopin he fall sleep so dey can b pownzin.


_________________
NobelCynic (on WP)
My given name is Kenneth


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

29 Apr 2010, 4:16 pm

NIV is my personal preference for modern translations, however it is copyrighted so I'll just provide a link:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... ersion=NIV



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

29 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

There are plenty of Christians who are antisemitic, however that is not necessarily the case with Christianity itself or with all of the believers either. The people zer0netgain is speaking about, although he incorrectly overgeneralized as "the Jews" were the Pharisees, a sect of Judaism at the time. Have you read the Talmud or the other commentaries on the Talmud of which the Talmud is a commentary on the Tanakh? You know all the fences that are built in order to prevent the actions from occurring and all that sort, it's what Jesus referred to in Luke 11:37-54,





I know the Talmud Bavli (Babylonian Talmud) better than you. When I was younger I used to study it with qualified rabbis dof yomi --- a page a day and sometimes more. Generations of rabbis sought to understand the contents of TNKH and the oral tradition and place restrictions around the commandments so that they would not be transgressed. TNKH by itself is problematical. One needs the oral tradition to comprehend it more fully.

ruveyn



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

29 Apr 2010, 4:38 pm

ruveyn wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:

There are plenty of Christians who are antisemitic, however that is not necessarily the case with Christianity itself or with all of the believers either. The people zer0netgain is speaking about, although he incorrectly overgeneralized as "the Jews" were the Pharisees, a sect of Judaism at the time. Have you read the Talmud or the other commentaries on the Talmud of which the Talmud is a commentary on the Tanakh? You know all the fences that are built in order to prevent the actions from occurring and all that sort, it's what Jesus referred to in Luke 11:37-54,





I know the Talmud Bavli (Babylonian Talmud) better than you. When I was younger I used to study it with qualified rabbis dof yomi --- a page a day and sometimes more. Generations of rabbis sought to understand the contents of TNKH and the oral tradition and place restrictions around the commandments so that they would not be transgressed. TNKH by itself is problematical. One needs the oral tradition to comprehend it more fully.

ruveyn


I mean no disrespect here. It seems to me that the oral tradition complicated things more so than solved problems. Speaking purely from a Christian perspective here, the TNKH seems fairly cut-and-dry, though not really less difficult. My understanding was that all the law was summed in the statement "Love the Lord... etc." Though I'm sure rabbinical tradition since the destruction of the temple has gotten a lot kinder since those days, it's easy for one to imagine that trying to hold to a massive set of strict rules from both oral and written traditions would have been quite a heavy burden on those seeking to uphold it, not to mention a few questionable details in different versions of the Talmud. But in all fairness, I'm not familiar with the Talmud beyond a few bits and pieces, so I'm not in a position to debate about it.

ruveyn, perhaps you CAN clarify something for me, though, since this seems to be within your realm of knowledge. As I've already mentioned, I don't recall ever reading about ritual hand-washing in the TNKH. Did I miss something, or would that be something more likely under the authority of the Talmud? If the Talmud, exactly what does it have to say about hand-washing before meals?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

29 Apr 2010, 5:05 pm

AngelRho wrote:

I mean no disrespect here. It seems to me that the oral tradition complicated things more so than solved problems. Speaking purely from a Christian perspective here, the TNKH seems fairly cut-and-dry, though not really less difficult.


Which is precisely why you do not know what you are talking about. TNKH was written by Jews for Jews. When the Christians co-opted it to misinterpret the prophets they completely missed the point of the Commandments. The essence of Christianity is to deny Torah and substitute good feelings in the intestines. You buddy Paul/Saul started this perverse line of thinking which has evolved into the essential Protestant doctrines. All based on a misunderstand of TNKH and terribly bad for the Jews.

ruveyn



Asmodeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520

29 Apr 2010, 6:21 pm

In regard to the responses about arranged marriage:
Arranged marriage and platonic decision to get married are the only two scenarios in which someone could become married without lust, and was a response to zer0netgain's "It is wrong to lust upon a woman in your heart because the heart is where sin begins.". It was a response to that post directly, his interpretation, and not that held by either the Bible or other Christians. Read it over.

I may be underinformed here but as it stands in my mind so far the Jewish religion has Orthodox jews, and as far as I am aware they follow the Torah consider it's laws are Divine, were transmitted by God to Moses, are eternal, and are unalterable, so they don't fall under the catergories I described earlier. I could try pulling apart the Torah, but it'd likely involve a combination of ruveyn's mentioned schooling and personal study, which for the sake of time and a thread here it's really not worth starting.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

03 May 2010, 11:25 am

ruveyn wrote:
AngelRho wrote:

I mean no disrespect here. It seems to me that the oral tradition complicated things more so than solved problems. Speaking purely from a Christian perspective here, the TNKH seems fairly cut-and-dry, though not really less difficult.


Which is precisely why you do not know what you are talking about. TNKH was written by Jews for Jews. When the Christians co-opted it to misinterpret the prophets they completely missed the point of the Commandments. The essence of Christianity is to deny Torah and substitute good feelings in the intestines. You buddy Paul/Saul started this perverse line of thinking which has evolved into the essential Protestant doctrines. All based on a misunderstand of TNKH and terribly bad for the Jews.

ruveyn


Note what I placed in bold. If that is so, and I agree with that statement in principle, then help me out with this:

Exodus 6:1-6--But the Lord replied to Moses, "Now you are going to see what I will do to Pharaoh: he will let them go because of My strong hand; he will drive them out of his land because of My strong hand." Then God spoke to Moses, telling him, "I am Yahweh. I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as God Almighty, but I did not make My name Yahweh known to them. I also established My covenant with them to give them the land of Canaan, the land they lived in as foreigners. Furthermore, I have heard the groaning of the Israelites, whom the Egyptians are forcing to work as slaves, and I have remembered My covenant. Therefore tell the Israelites: I am Yahweh, and I will deliver you from the forced labor of the Egyptians and free you from the slavery to them. I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and great acts of judgment."

This suggests to me that one purpose that God had for Israel was to declare the glory of God to all people.

Exodus 12:48-49--If a foreigner resides with you and wants to celebrate the Lord's Passover, every male in his household must be circumcised, and then he may participate; he will become like a native of the land. But no uncircumcised person may eat it. The same law will apply to both the native and the foreigner who resides among you.

According to this, foreigners may take part in the Passover and it is not reserved solely for Jews.

2 Chronicles 30:25--Then the whole assembly of Judah with the priests and Levites, the whole assembly that came from Israel, the foreigners who came from the land of Israel, and those who were living in Judah, rejoiced.

This passage is long removed from the Exodus period, but also demonstrates that non-Jews DID take part in the Passover. It stands to reason that foreigners would have had a place in other aspects of law and tradition and certainly that God intended that foreigners be affected by what the Jews did--that is, that foreigners would come to worship Yahweh as well as the Jews.

I'm very sorry you feel that we Christians have "co-opted" it, but there are a few of us (maybe even more than a few) that really do desire to understand. In my own observance of Christian teaching (that is, New Testament teaching), I recognize that Paul advocated for an assimilation of Christ's teachings into one's own culture while avoiding the sins of those cultures--most notably idolatrous practices, but certainly not limited to those. I interpret the Torah as an outline of Israelite cultural customs and traditions as well as moral codes, the latter of which ought to remain relevant to anyone and any system of law and justice, not just Jews and Christians.

If I don't know what I'm talking about, I can accept that because one regret I do have is not having taken any Biblical study very seriously. I've always held on tightly to my faith, but I've never tried to understand fully what all that means (that is, what the Bible actually says). If I've grossly misinterpreted something, I'd greatly appreciate enlightenment from someone who knows these things intimately well. You seem to have a deep intellectual insight into the TNKH, and any point of view from someone so knowledgeable would be respectfully appreciated.