Deaths as Israeli forces storm Gaza aid ship
ASPowerations
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42e9/f42e92b31dce127a3da446b44f2449571ce38268" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 8 Dec 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 69
Location: Manhattan, NY
jc6chan wrote:
nara44 wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
Also, they are many groups comprised of BOTH Jews and Arabs living INSIDE Israel who protest against Israel's policies and are willing to continuously suffer under Israeli soldier's tear gas attacks yet they continue to protest about the siege and confiscation of land and property to build walls and expand settlements. And so while Israel has the right to self-defense, I find it troubling to sympathize with the country in general since at the same time, they have no respect for Palestinian land and property in the West Bank. They would rather kick a Palestinian family out then to ask some settlers to move elsewhere in Israel because there is no space for expansion.
I don't think anyone want u to sympathize with Israel,
What is needed is objective analysis of the situation on a case by case basis,
In case of the grabbing of land etc.. Israel bad
In case of the of the incident discussed in this thread the "peace activists" were to blame and the international community is wrong both in legal and moral terms
I am glad you have realized to analyse both good and bad. I have read that Hamas has less corruption within its party then other Palestinian parties and they actually spend a lot of money on social services aside from spending money on rockets. That is why they won the elections in 2006. Other Palestinian parties fail to provide for its citizens, although Hamas may not be doing a good job either because of the siege. I have to say that the international community has been hiding the good side of Hamas.
Hamas HAD been providing for their citizens. Then they got elected to power, and developed the military capability to keep other parties in check. They no longer need the help of the common citizen, so they no longer provide for them.
_________________
The geeks shall rise!!
ASPowerations wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
nara44 wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
Also, they are many groups comprised of BOTH Jews and Arabs living INSIDE Israel who protest against Israel's policies and are willing to continuously suffer under Israeli soldier's tear gas attacks yet they continue to protest about the siege and confiscation of land and property to build walls and expand settlements. And so while Israel has the right to self-defense, I find it troubling to sympathize with the country in general since at the same time, they have no respect for Palestinian land and property in the West Bank. They would rather kick a Palestinian family out then to ask some settlers to move elsewhere in Israel because there is no space for expansion.
I don't think anyone want u to sympathize with Israel,
What is needed is objective analysis of the situation on a case by case basis,
In case of the grabbing of land etc.. Israel bad
In case of the of the incident discussed in this thread the "peace activists" were to blame and the international community is wrong both in legal and moral terms
I am glad you have realized to analyse both good and bad. I have read that Hamas has less corruption within its party then other Palestinian parties and they actually spend a lot of money on social services aside from spending money on rockets. That is why they won the elections in 2006. Other Palestinian parties fail to provide for its citizens, although Hamas may not be doing a good job either because of the siege. I have to say that the international community has been hiding the good side of Hamas.
Hamas HAD been providing for their citizens. Then they got elected to power, and developed the military capability to keep other parties in check. They no longer need the help of the common citizen, so they no longer provide for them.
Wasn't it after Hamas had been elected to power that Israel started pressing down really hard in isolating the strip and essentially gave Abbas control of the West Bank?
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
skafather84 wrote:
Wasn't it after Hamas had been elected to power that Israel started pressing down really hard in isolating the strip and essentially gave Abbas control of the West Bank?
Sure,i don't know about the WB,the PLO has the self control there since the Oslo agreement many years ago,but Israel indeed made things worth for the strip since Hamas took control there(murdering lot's of Abbas men in the process ) because Hamas made things worse for the Israel ,
That's life u know, u hurt people they try to stop you ,and this rule applies even for the Palestinian.
Before the Hamas decided to attack Israel the border between Gaza and Israel was open People and goods were streaming freely to both sides but for some strange reason no one seems to remember this simple fact,nor do any one remember that Israel left the strip with no condition in order to let the Palestinians a a chance at building their own state.
ASPowerations wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
nara44 wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
Also, they are many groups comprised of BOTH Jews and Arabs living INSIDE Israel who protest against Israel's policies and are willing to continuously suffer under Israeli soldier's tear gas attacks yet they continue to protest about the siege and confiscation of land and property to build walls and expand settlements. And so while Israel has the right to self-defense, I find it troubling to sympathize with the country in general since at the same time, they have no respect for Palestinian land and property in the West Bank. They would rather kick a Palestinian family out then to ask some settlers to move elsewhere in Israel because there is no space for expansion.
I don't think anyone want u to sympathize with Israel,
What is needed is objective analysis of the situation on a case by case basis,
In case of the grabbing of land etc.. Israel bad
In case of the of the incident discussed in this thread the "peace activists" were to blame and the international community is wrong both in legal and moral terms
I am glad you have realized to analyse both good and bad. I have read that Hamas has less corruption within its party then other Palestinian parties and they actually spend a lot of money on social services aside from spending money on rockets. That is why they won the elections in 2006. Other Palestinian parties fail to provide for its citizens, although Hamas may not be doing a good job either because of the siege. I have to say that the international community has been hiding the good side of Hamas.
Hamas HAD been providing for their citizens. Then they got elected to power, and developed the military capability to keep other parties in check. They no longer need the help of the common citizen, so they no longer provide for them.
Hamas is as corrupt as the PLO, if not more,keeping the population depending on welfare doesn't really help for a development of the country but make it totally dependent on the ruling forces,
Establishing a transparent and fair system of law and order that would allow commerce and education to support creativity is not in the Hamas interest as they are basically a fundamentalist regime
Abbas men were making a lot of progress in those area at the last few ears and consequently life at the WB are totally different from the life in Gaza.
Actually , getting the blockade removed is quite simple,Abbas could achieve that in no time if Hamas would let him.
nara44 wrote:
Hamas is as corrupt as the PLO, if not more,keeping the population depending on welfare doesn't really help for a development of the country but make it totally dependent on the ruling forces,
What else are they going to do with Israel preventing commerce through their blockade? Lift the blockade, and Gaza could supplant Beirut as a favorite Arab vacation spot.
Tim_Tex wrote:
Both groups need to convert to Christianity.
Obviously.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
psychohist wrote:
nara44 wrote:
Hamas is as corrupt as the PLO, if not more,keeping the population depending on welfare doesn't really help for a development of the country but make it totally dependent on the ruling forces,
What else are they going to do with Israel preventing commerce through their blockade? Lift the blockade, and Gaza could supplant Beirut as a favorite Arab vacation spot.
Gaza wasn't always under blockade, It had many chances in the past to take the direction u suggested but chose otherwise,in the grownups world choices have consequences and the choice is very clear to the party involved,no violence = no blockade and a chance to build a prosperous state,.
I don't see many countries that supplies their their enemies,
Israel does just that on a daily basis and still is one of the most hated states in the world.
nara44 wrote:
ASPowerations wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
nara44 wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
Also, they are many groups comprised of BOTH Jews and Arabs living INSIDE Israel who protest against Israel's policies and are willing to continuously suffer under Israeli soldier's tear gas attacks yet they continue to protest about the siege and confiscation of land and property to build walls and expand settlements. And so while Israel has the right to self-defense, I find it troubling to sympathize with the country in general since at the same time, they have no respect for Palestinian land and property in the West Bank. They would rather kick a Palestinian family out then to ask some settlers to move elsewhere in Israel because there is no space for expansion.
I don't think anyone want u to sympathize with Israel,
What is needed is objective analysis of the situation on a case by case basis,
In case of the grabbing of land etc.. Israel bad
In case of the of the incident discussed in this thread the "peace activists" were to blame and the international community is wrong both in legal and moral terms
I am glad you have realized to analyse both good and bad. I have read that Hamas has less corruption within its party then other Palestinian parties and they actually spend a lot of money on social services aside from spending money on rockets. That is why they won the elections in 2006. Other Palestinian parties fail to provide for its citizens, although Hamas may not be doing a good job either because of the siege. I have to say that the international community has been hiding the good side of Hamas.
Hamas HAD been providing for their citizens. Then they got elected to power, and developed the military capability to keep other parties in check. They no longer need the help of the common citizen, so they no longer provide for them.
Hamas is as corrupt as the PLO, if not more,keeping the population depending on welfare doesn't really help for a development of the country but make it totally dependent on the ruling forces,
Establishing a transparent and fair system of law and order that would allow commerce and education to support creativity is not in the Hamas interest as they are basically a fundamentalist regime
Abbas men were making a lot of progress in those area at the last few ears and consequently life at the WB are totally different from the life in Gaza.
Actually , getting the blockade removed is quite simple,Abbas could achieve that in no time if Hamas would let him.
The blockade prevents Hamas from providing for the population.
New video released: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6sAEYpHF24
Shows the activists throw a stun grenade at the navy boat, and waiting with bats and chains.
Two excellent suggestions from Haaretz columnists:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... t-1.293671
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... n-1.293670
sartresue
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df89e/df89efd598b1b2bb0673455105795a26319a7761" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism
psychohist wrote:
Two excellent suggestions from Haaretz columnists:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... t-1.293671
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... n-1.293670
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... t-1.293671
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... n-1.293670
The Land topic
The second article, about 'another option', is worth a talk. There is hope in that message.
Conversion factoid topic
Time_Tex Wrote:
Quote:
Both groups need to convert to Christianity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9fc0/f9fc0a73dd57feae8f63e27df00fdad53bd734e7" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b70f/5b70fe2dd294576c3d26e5a6cd2f140a55834b96" alt="Shame On You :shameonyou:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23259/2325942d5f956e23d0b663fc36737595f5c951a3" alt="Razz :P"
_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind
Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory
NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump proposes U.S. control of Gaza |
17 Feb 2025, 5:07 am |
Israel and Hamas reach Gaza ceasefire and hostage release de |
Yesterday, 10:36 am |
Trump administration forces out multiple senior FBI official |
03 Feb 2025, 5:06 pm |
Damaging Storm hits Ireland, parts of UK |
24 Jan 2025, 6:13 am |