Obama Invades Uganda, Targets Christians
Master_Pedant wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I'm against it because there is no side that is morally better than the other here.
The Lord's Resistance Army is probably one of the evilest organizations on the planet.
I can think of more evil Organizations on the planet, such as the Syrian Government...
Inuyasha wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I'm against it because there is no side that is morally better than the other here.
The Lord's Resistance Army is probably one of the evilest organizations on the planet.
I can think of more evil Organizations on the planet, such as the Syrian Government...
I have not been listening to republican Pravda lately are they beating the war drum for Syria now?
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I'm against it because there is no side that is morally better than the other here.
The Lord's Resistance Army is probably one of the evilest organizations on the planet.
I can think of more evil Organizations on the planet, such as the Syrian Government...
I have not been listening to republican Pravda lately are they beating the war drum for Syria now?
Explains Islamic Clerics saying Israel has more humanity than the Syrian Government.
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I'm against it because there is no side that is morally better than the other here.
The Lord's Resistance Army is probably one of the evilest organizations on the planet.
I can think of more evil Organizations on the planet, such as the Syrian Government...
I have not been listening to republican Pravda lately are they beating the war drum for Syria now?
Explains Islamic Clerics saying Israel has more humanity than the Syrian Government.
Cause it is obviously true?
Does not mean that war with Damascus is the right answer.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ip08pjKngI[/youtube]
John_Browning
Veteran
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range
Gedrene wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
Obama acts Christian when it suits him and sucks up to Muslims when it suits him, but he has no room for any other deity in his life but himself.
This is just another blastedly evil attack on Obama for no reason. Again it implies all sorts of things that are only true in the minds of deluded fools who want to attack Obama for no reason except self satisfaction.
It's called narcissistic behavior, which Obama has a long history of exhibiting. Obama did not send military advisers to Uganda for any form of religious persecution because Obama serves no god but himself.
That's about the most insensible conclusion I have never heard of.Obama didn't what what what? Obama is self-righteous because he didn't serve military advisors to Uganda for any form of religious persecution.
Are you suggesting that if he did send them in order to religiously persecute he somehow would be serving a God? Are you insane?
You claim once again that Obama is bad on an insane pretext that has no actual basis. YOur first example, the 'long history of exhibiting' bit is just a case of Ipsus dixit, a logical fallacy because tyou then don't qualify what you say. Therefore you are talking out of your arse.
The second is just insane logic, worthy of either a need to remedy terrible English or insanity.
No, I said Obama did NOT send advisers for the purpose of religious persecution because in his heart, Obama is a godless individual.
_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown
"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud
John_Browning wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
Obama acts Christian when it suits him and sucks up to Muslims when it suits him, but he has no room for any other deity in his life but himself.
This is just another blastedly evil attack on Obama for no reason. Again it implies all sorts of things that are only true in the minds of deluded fools who want to attack Obama for no reason except self satisfaction.
It's called narcissistic behavior, which Obama has a long history of exhibiting. Obama did not send military advisers to Uganda for any form of religious persecution because Obama serves no god but himself.
That's about the most insensible conclusion I have never heard of.Obama didn't what what what? Obama is self-righteous because he didn't serve military advisors to Uganda for any form of religious persecution.
Are you suggesting that if he did send them in order to religiously persecute he somehow would be serving a God? Are you insane?
You claim once again that Obama is bad on an insane pretext that has no actual basis. YOur first example, the 'long history of exhibiting' bit is just a case of Ipsus dixit, a logical fallacy because tyou then don't qualify what you say. Therefore you are talking out of your arse.
The second is just insane logic, worthy of either a need to remedy terrible English or insanity.
No, I said Obama did NOT send advisers for the purpose of religious persecution because in his heart, Obama is a godless individual.
If I am reading the two of you correctly that is how Gedrene is reading you.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
Inuyasha wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
The local governments are not good, but I ask you to demonstrate how they are "just as evil" as the LRA
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Inuyasha wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
Not really, the LRA has no redeeming qualities. You can't equate them to governments in the areas they're located. They're more of a cult group than a Christian group btw.
It doesn't really matter either way about their neighbors tho, they're not a threat and it's not our responsibility.
Jacoby wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
Not really, the LRA has no redeeming qualities, you can't equate them to governments in the areas they're located. They're more of a cult group than a Christian group btw.
It doesn't really matter either way about their neighbors tho, they're not a threat and it's not our responsibility.
Okay they are a cult group, that doesn't change the fact the people Obama is going to be helping have just as bad of a track record as the LRA.
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
The local governments are not good, but I ask you to demonstrate how they are "just as evil" as the LRA
While I disagree with the "morality" that has lead the "conservatives" to the opinion that we should not interfere here
I agree that we should not have a military presence in Uganda or in any other country.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
The local governments are not good, but I ask you to demonstrate how they are "just as evil" as the LRA
While I disagree with the "morality" that has lead the "conservatives" to the opinion that we should not interfere here
I agree that we should not have a military presence in Uganda or in any other country.
The United States and its allies have the potential to do a lot of good in some places in the world. Imagine had the US intervened in Rwanda the hundreds of thousands of lives that would have been saved. Human Rights Watch even welcomed the deployment.
In any case we're talking about 100 military advisers with authorization to provide training and to defend themselves. That is hardly a large military presence. The US has thousands of troops in South Korea and elsewhere doing very little other than existing as an "army in being" to scare local baddies; and I don't hear anyone crying about them
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Vigilans wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The LRA is an evil group, Rush is stupid for not knowing that. However they are not a threat US domestic security in the slightest so our troops should not be in Uganda. It's not our responsibility.
I would also point out the governments in the region are just as evil as LRA, so Rush might be referring to that point. The only difference one can see between the two sides is religious affiliation.
The local governments are not good, but I ask you to demonstrate how they are "just as evil" as the LRA
While I disagree with the "morality" that has lead the "conservatives" to the opinion that we should not interfere here
I agree that we should not have a military presence in Uganda or in any other country.
The United States and its allies have the potential to do a lot of good in some places in the world. Imagine had the US intervened in Rwanda the hundreds of thousands of lives that would have been saved. Human Rights Watch even welcomed the deployment.
In any case we're talking about 100 military advisers with authorization to provide training and to defend themselves. That is hardly a large military presence. The US has thousands of troops in South Korea and elsewhere doing very little other than existing as an "army in being" to scare local baddies; and I don't hear anyone crying about them
I support the Ugandan Advisers if we close the 30 odd installations in Korea.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/