Is Christianity nonsense?

Post Reply New Topic

Honestly, I think ruveyn's treatment is the most correct.

The trinity is this notion: "that in the unity of the Godhead there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one from another. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God."
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm

And in the same source, the problems with it were well recognized: "It is manifest that a dogma so mysterious presupposes a Divine revelation. When the fact of revelation, understood in its full sense as the speech of God to man, is no longer admitted, the rejection of the doctrine follows as a necessary consequence."

This problem is well recognized by Christian philosophers:
"As is well known, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity poses a serious philosophical problem. On the one hand, it affirms that there are three distinct Persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—each of whom is God. On the other hand, it says that there is one and only one God. The doctrine therefore pulls us in two directions at once—in the direction of saying that there is exactly one divine being and in the direction of saying that there is more than one." - Michael Rea from "Material Constitution and the Trinity"

Also, JNathanK's answer is actually erroneous. Persons cannot be aspects. So, saying "the spirit is the relationship between self and other" and saying "the spirit is a person" seem to be conceptually confused.

I am unsure what "The_Walrus" is failing to understand as well. The trinity is a confusing doctrine. This is recognized by many Christian sources, and Christian intellectuals to this day. This is clearly evident from the definitions of it. Even the history of the Christian church bears witness to this as the trinity is one of biggest areas of contention within the church across history, whether we talk about the Arians and Sabellians in the early church, or even the Socinians of the 16th and 17th centuries, and the Unitarian movement, or even to this day with Jehovah's witnesses who reject the idea as nonsense.(And I'm not saying that I throw my lot in with them, only that few other doctrines are so heavily contested despite the clear orthodoxy)

How can Christianity be nonsense? It was taught to me at school in the form of religious education (England)
I asked my teacher who did Caine marry after being banished to the land of nod after killing his brother Able.
My teacher simply replied, back in those days people lived to be 800 years old.... So it must be true.

I wish I’d been smart enough at the time and said 100 years old or 800 years old, he still married his sister and committed incest.

I think that if you look past some of the close-minded and un-Jesus-like people who claim to be his followers, the general principles of loving others and doing good to people are pretty solid and practical advice for a reasonably happy life.