Page 5 of 8 [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

16 Dec 2012, 12:15 pm

why not?

because you have to make a little sacrifice, you did that the day you had the chance of moving and didnt.

frankly there is more than enough economic power for everyone, except there are parts of our society that have taken it upon themsleves to control the economic power of every person under their employ to an extent not even seen in the monarchies of old, that is if you see the relative increase in economiuc power pr person since then.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Dec 2012, 12:30 pm

adb wrote:
marshall wrote:
I have a much bigger problem with libertarians that have the view that even if the poor do indeed get poorer, class inequality increases, and many more people suffer due to the implementation of laissez-faire economic policies, they will never ever change their views because their own personal autonomy and "right" to not to be bothered should trump all else. I can understand that someone can have that view but I will never be able to sympathize with it or find it anything less than repugnant. I find it selfish when I see it is primary people who have "made it" economically and aren't personally struggling hold this view.

I've "made it" economically and I hold this view.

But I also held this view when I was skipping meals and sleeping in an empty room with no furniture. It's what made me take responsibility for myself and change it. It's what made me fight through the disadvantages of AS, getting outside my comfort zone and making things happen, rather than expecting other people to bail me out.

Taking responsibility for yourself and wanting to keep what you've earned is not selfish. What's selfish is when you get on your soapbox and try to get the government to take from the people who produce in order to support your desire to consume.


And if you didn't make it? If you were born in some third world dump rather than the good ole' USA? If you developed cancer at a young age driving you bankrupt? You are selfish in that you want to take 100% credit for you "success" while denying the elements of good fortune you have had. Also not all people desire to "consume". That is a dim and bigoted view of others. What about people who simply wish to survive and not be so miserable they would prefer they were never born?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 12:35 pm

Oodain wrote:
why not?

because you have to make a little sacrifice, you did that the day you had the chance of moving and didnt.

frankly there is more than enough economic power for everyone, except there are parts of our society that have taken it upon themsleves to control the economic power of every person under their employ to an extent not even seen in the monarchies of old, that is if you see the relative increase in economiuc power pr person since then.


We shall have to deal with these obstructionists sooner rather than later. The way the "unseen hand" is supposed to work is that each of us correctly pursuing our interests produced an aggregate improvement in the society. It is the very negation of the zero sum game. We are going to have to deal those those reactionaries who would put us back into the zero sum world.

ruveyn



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Dec 2012, 12:43 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Oodain wrote:
to punish peiople for not being able to work thorugh something like that is in my eyes inhumane, nothing less.



Fine. Let us not blame the losers for their loss. But let us not sacrifice our welfare for them out of sympathy.

ruveyn

You have stated your own granddaughter is autistic? If she can't be 100% financially self-sufficient she is a "loser" in your eyes?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 12:46 pm

marshall wrote:
You have stated your own granddaughter is autistic? If she can't be 100% financially self-sufficient she is a "loser" in your eyes?


Not my grand-daughter. My #1 son. And he is high functioning. He is doing alright for himself.
My flesh and blood are never losers. They are mine.

ruveyn



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Dec 2012, 12:50 pm

ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
You have stated your own granddaughter is autistic? If she can't be 100% financially self-sufficient she is a "loser" in your eyes?


Not my grand-daughter. My #1 son. And he is high functioning. He is doing alright for himself.
My flesh and blood are never losers. They are mine.

ruveyn


I see, only other people are losers? And the doofus Dox47 cannot understand why I think "libertarians" like you and adb are selfish pricks.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 12:51 pm

marshall wrote:

I see, only other people are losers? And the doofus Dox47 cannot understand why I think "libertarians" like you and adb are selfish pricks.


What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

ruveyn



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 12:53 pm

ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:

I see, only other people are losers? And the doofus Dox47 cannot understand why I think "libertarians" like you and adb are selfish pricks.


What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

I love my children more than I love yours. Well... I don't love your children, exactly, but I don't hate them either. That is human nature. People love their own children more than they love the children of others. It is a Darwinian survival characteristic.

ruveyn



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Dec 2012, 12:56 pm

ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:

I see, only other people are losers? And the doofus Dox47 cannot understand why I think "libertarians" like you and adb are selfish pricks.


What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

ruveyn


And with that mentality the whole world goes to hell in a hand-basket. You've already admitted the possibility that technology may make make full employment impossible in the future and don't seem to care because "what's mine is mine". Why did you have children if you are wishing such a dim future on them?



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

16 Dec 2012, 12:58 pm

hell at least a society where work is minimal some form of redistribution would be neccesary(here we disregard that it to a large extent already should be)


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 12:59 pm

marshall wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:

I see, only other people are losers? And the doofus Dox47 cannot understand why I think "libertarians" like you and adb are selfish pricks.


What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

ruveyn


And with that mentality the whole world goes to hell in a hand-basket. You've already admitted the possibility that technology may make make full employment impossible in the future and don't seem to care because "what's mine is mine". Why did you have children if you are wishing such a dim future on them?


Actually, I care a great deal. My grand chlldren are going to have to deal with it and not in all that many years. I might even be alive to see the sh*t hit the fan.

What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

ruveyn



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

16 Dec 2012, 1:15 pm

what a baseless tautology it is indeed.

what is mine is based upon others just as it is for you.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 1:22 pm

Oodain wrote:
what a baseless tautology it is indeed.

what is mine is based upon others just as it is for you.


If someone stole your wallet or emptied out your bank account would you be upset?

ruveyn



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Dec 2012, 1:55 pm

ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:

I see, only other people are losers? And the doofus Dox47 cannot understand why I think "libertarians" like you and adb are selfish pricks.


What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

ruveyn


And with that mentality the whole world goes to hell in a hand-basket. You've already admitted the possibility that technology may make make full employment impossible in the future and don't seem to care because "what's mine is mine". Why did you have children if you are wishing such a dim future on them?


Actually, I care a great deal. My grand chlldren are going to have to deal with it and not in all that many years. I might even be alive to see the sh*t hit the fan.

What is mine is Mine and what is yours is Yours.

ruveyn


This extreme "what's mine is mine" attitude that has infected our society will indeed cause s**t to hit the fan and you are indeed part of the disease.



adb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 532

16 Dec 2012, 1:56 pm

marshall wrote:
And if you didn't make it?

Then I would still be trying.

Quote:
If you were born in some third world dump rather than the good ole' USA?

What does this have to do with anything? Other countries aren't my problem.

Quote:
If you developed cancer at a young age driving you bankrupt?

One of my cousins had exactly this happen. He worked his way out of it and is now self-employed and doing quite well.

Quote:
You are selfish in that you want to take 100% credit for you "success" while denying the elements of good fortune you have had.

You and Obama, trying to take credit for the success I fought for decades to achieve. You didn't give me anything. All you do is take. I pay an order of magnitude more in taxes than I receive in government services.

Quote:
Also not all people desire to "consume". That is a dim and bigoted view of others.

I didn't say all people desire to consume. It's just that usually it's the people focused on consumption that want to take from other people. If everyone was focused on consumption, we'd have no economy. There have to be producers to support consumers.

I'm not bigoted. I am not intolerant of other peoples' opinions. You can think what you want and I'll even consider your ideas no matter how ridiculous they may be. What I'm not tolerant of is stealing from those who produce more than they consume in order to support those who consume more than they produce.

Quote:
What about people who simply wish to survive and not be so miserable they would prefer they were never born?

They should do the bare minimum to support their simple wish to survive. How they feel about it (misery or whatever) is really not my problem until they use the government to plunder my bank account rather than working for what they need.

You've accused me a couple times of living in a fantasy world, but you seem to think that humans will put the good of society over the good of self. That is a fantasy that is exposed every time you have a catastrophe and resources are scarce. You can fight human nature or you can work with it. Libertarian ideas work with it. Socialist ideas work against it.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2012, 2:54 pm

adb wrote:

You've accused me a couple times of living in a fantasy world, but you seem to think that humans will put the good of society over the good of self. That is a fantasy that is exposed every time you have a catastrophe and resources are scarce. You can fight human nature or you can work with it. Libertarian ideas work with it. Socialist ideas work against it.


Indeed. In order for anyone to benefit society, one must first see to his own well being.

ruveyn