Kraichgauer wrote:
I recall a WP member from Britain a few years ago who had made the claim that one particular British athlete, despite being a millionaire today, was still a working class boy because he had been born in the working class. I told her, from an American perspective, this athlete was not working class any longer, but a millionaire.
There is a social mobility thing at play here. If you're working class originally, you don't get to become upper class no matter how much money you make. You can buy a massive estate with a mansion and a stables and a boating lake and you'll still never be allowed 'in the club'. That's just how it is here. There's old money and new money.
Equally though, working class people who've 'done good' often wear their working class origins as a point of pride, which is why the Beatles can claim it and whatever British athlete that person was talking about might still consider themselves working class. Working class people might want to become wealthy but many would be offended if you suggested they were upper class.
It's a bit like the rappers in the US who have millions of dollars but still 'keep it real' with their street background.
Yeah, money doesn't shake class discrimination. Everyone finds out where a person "came from", despite where they may have ended up.