Thoughts on a Canadian Coalition Government crisis

Page 5 of 7 [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


How functional are coalition governments?
Yes (explain) 50%  50%  [ 2 ]
No (explain) 25%  25%  [ 1 ]
I do not know (reason) 25%  25%  [ 1 ]
Who cares? (explain) 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 4

Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

22 Dec 2008, 8:07 pm

sartresue wrote:
Getting over it topic

I am going to follow my own advice and stay tuned on this one, Fuzzy. It is a real nail-biter. I would like such a bail out to work--though I am not sure how it will. I can see it from both sides--but only one will show when all is said and done.

I am not a liberal, Fuzzy. But I think Iggy is the only Iffy left.


I'm having a hard time these days and its tricky focusing on less-than-immediate stuff, so I appreciate you bringing up this topic again. It gives me something to dwell on other than my own problems.


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

17 Jan 2009, 3:03 pm

Mini update topic

I had been following the First Ministers' Conference and the gist of it is that Stephen Harper is hoping his government does not fall flat. I think he is waiting for Barack Obama to say something as soon as he is inaugurated as US President on January 20. The Harper budget is due on January 26.

Still staying tuned in. :)


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

17 Jan 2009, 3:46 pm

coyote wrote:
I hope poeples here have the intelligence to do some search by themselves cause what is depicted here is far from the thruth...

Quote:
Its a long topic to delve into but they've made life very difficult for anybody who isn't French and have attempted to separate Quebec from Canada twice so far.


HAHAHAH..... life is alreday difficult for those who only speaks french. If i would decice tomorrow to stop speaking english, I, as thousands of other QC FRENCH NATIVE, would lose our jobs. Hey, i'm not even able to beeing served decently in my own language when i go to the grocery. I'm sorry if you find we're making life hard for you, it's because we're trying to ease it a bit from hundreds of years of oppression from you.... so gimme a break and stop your propaganda

the referendum was lost because Canada cheated. They spent millions, they reduced the plane ticket's prices so thousands of, opportunistic, canadians could come here and manifest... Yes, they did that.....

And BTW, ..... BC wants to separate, and Ontario too. This country is dead. I don't give it 10 more years....

so i agree what is happening now is not a good thing for 'CANADA' but it is VERY good for what will survive after.....

I imagine very well 4 or 5 new countries, all independant.... and no more canada


if the canada i knew, the canada that i grew up in and am proud to call my home, and VERY SPECIFICALLY because it is one of the few (if any other) nations in the world where french and english have lived as neighbours for so long and not been at war with each other --if that canada ceased to exist i don't know what i would do. that would be the saddest day of my life, i think. i love my country and am proud of it because of the ideals that were taught to me growing up, that were taught to me as part of our national identity to be maintained and cherished --ideals like our tolerance and our multiculturalism, and our attitude that we extend to each other and the world, that we are all brothers and just learning how to live together on this planet, and must try to respect each other.

i love all of my fellow canadians equally, whether they be french, or first nations, or new to our country, or all the other plain old white anglophones like me. i try to celebrate what we represent to the world, and i pray we can continue to be an example of a place where people can have their differences and still live together in peace. this is a precious precious thing we have here, this delicate balance that is our nation. we must preserve it, and continue to try to make it a place where everyone can be different but still equal.



sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

17 Jan 2009, 8:41 pm

Artist's rendition topic

Wow, SA, that was beautiful. I would like those words to reach Steve's ear. I know Iggy would listen (at least until he is PM :wink: )

Obama and the global economic crisis are on everyone's mind right now. I am just waiting for the inauguration and that budget. The Governor General is in Haiti (her birth nation) right now and I hope she can be back for the budget.

I guess she needed a breather. :?


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

17 Jan 2009, 8:51 pm

Welcome back to the topic sartresue! I was thinking about reviving it too.

Its really all quiet on the news front, isnt it?


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

18 Jan 2009, 11:04 am

Yes, SNAFU topic

True, Fuzzy. And the budget date set by the PM is January 27, not January 26, as I wrote in a recent post. Maybe they made it a day later because of Barack Obama's inauguration and his subsequent visit to Canada. But I have no idea the exact date of that.

The Mideast crisis, the global financial crisis...Same old same old.

If anything workable came out of that First Minister's conference it is that we all must work together on coming out of the cold this country is weathering at the moment (pun intended :lol:).


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

18 Jan 2009, 8:17 pm

So last I heard, the Liberals and conservatives were neck and neck in the polls. Maybe its changed now though?

I caught a snatch of dialog from Jack Layton saying that the NDP would vote against the bill. But thats to be expected, right?

Currently, Liberals dont want a coalition, but stand equal chances with the Conservatives of forming a minority government. It probably doesnt make sense for them to collapse the government when they stand an equal chance of still not getting elected.

I think it most likely that the two big parties will maintain the government with some concessions to the Liberals. Sorry Jack and Gilles. You are out in the cold again.

If there is hope for real change, it is as sartresue says: the first ministers must work together and leech some power back from the feds.


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

19 Jan 2009, 12:16 pm

Co-operative Canadians topic

Iggy was heard to say on CTV Newsnet On January 18 that any Conservative budget must take into consideration the Canadian people. How original. But as you stated, Fuzzy, we must all work together, and for this reason I do not think Iggy will rally a coalition to defeat the government at this time. Not enough money in the Liberal war chest and too much going on in the States right now. Steve played his king right and is still on the board.


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

19 Jan 2009, 9:26 pm

Guess who is coming to visit? topic

President Obama is coming in February!! Then we can have an Obama Day!! :D

For security reasons I suppose we will not know the exact date until late January at the earliest.

I am ususually not excdted about visitors, but this is a political/historical thing and so has value. Maybe he will have some impact on Steve, and the relationship will be genuine and beneficial, not like the Mulroney-Regan fakery in the eighties. :roll:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

19 Jan 2009, 10:39 pm

sartresue wrote:
Guess who is coming to visit? topic

President Obama is coming in February!! Then we can have an Obama Day!! :D


Excellent. I quite like the cut of his jib. Even if I dont think he will be the wunderkind president that people hope he will.

The relationship that he cements with Steve will enhance or hinder Harpers reputation. I think its a very important visit for Canadians.

Is it protocol that the loyal opposition meets the US president as well?


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

21 Jan 2009, 8:57 pm

Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition topic

Layton and Iggy say they would like to meet President Obama. No word on Duceppe. :wink:

Of course the Governor General, Michaelle Jean will be there. and I hope the First lady Michelle Robinson Obama will be there as well. I do not know about the kids.

And an Obama Day is better than a Rae Day!! ! :lol:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

21 Jan 2009, 10:50 pm

Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Depends on the country. Europe does it so frequently that is basically normal.


Non-Coalition governments in Europe are not just "normal", one party governments are the big exception. The most European countries (with the exception of the UK) have any form of proportional representation. So it is very unlikely that one party gets a majority in parliament and could form a government without a partner.



Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

21 Jan 2009, 11:07 pm

Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Don't shoot me, but what about in the future there being an EU-type of thing between the US and Canada? And while we're at it, include to Caribbean, minus Cuba.


This would need a new US-Constitution. A North-American Union, modelled after the EU, would strip Congress and the US-Supreme Court of so much power of making law and decision making that such a transfer of power would be not possible. The "Acquis Communautaire" is much more far-reaching than even the US-Code and the treaties forming the EU give the EU more law-making power than it is vested by the US-Constitution in the Congress. An adoption of the Art. 234 of the EC-Treaty would mean that the US-Surpeme must ask the Court of a North-American Union prior any decision which may involve an interpretation of the treaties and must follow this option.

If anyone like to get an overview about the current EU-Legislation:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/legis/20090101/index.htm



Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

21 Jan 2009, 11:18 pm

Vigilans wrote:
I can't describe the specifics but its something many former British colonies have as part of their government. I believe it involves suspending parliament for a period of time, or preventing them from making decisions. Therefore it would not be able to make a vote of no confidence and dismiss Harper's government for at least a year.


This idea comes from the English tradition that the King, aka the government, calls in Parliament only if the King needs more Money or needs a decision which needs a Act of Parliament. Elizabeth I - for example - called in her reign of more the 40 years parliament only five or six time.

The only reason why the parliament in Westminster is nearly permanently in session is the fact that most issues are regulated via an Act of Parliament and therefore the government needs both houses. Also Parliament reserved the right to review the most Statuary Instrument and therefore the Whitehall machinery would come quite quickly to a stand-still without Parliament in session.



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

22 Jan 2009, 1:52 am

sartresue wrote:
Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition topic

Layton and Iggy say they would like to meet President Obama. No word on Duceppe. :wink:

Of course the Governor General, Michaelle Jean will be there. and I hope the First lady Michelle Robinson Obama will be there as well. I do not know about the kids.

And an Obama Day is better than a Rae Day!! ! :lol:


I cannot see the kids going.

Aw, we dont have rae days out west!


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

23 Jan 2009, 1:20 pm

Days of Rae topic

Rae days are unpaid days off that were mandated by the former NDP Rae provincial government in the early 90s. :evil: This was a big reason Rae was not returned to office, and Mike Harris was elected. The nasty things he did in the name of conservatism were reminiscent of Maggie Thatcher and Reagan.

There has to be a middle ground between the welfare state and its opposite, the fiscal conservative one in which marginalized citizens fall through the cracks. This has always been the challenge for responsible, representative government.

I do not think leadership coalitions can work in our country, and certainly not in the way Hurricane_Delta has proposed. Disagreements are worked out in the parliamentary system without the bureaucratic nightmare of a coalition. A free trade agreement is one thing, but free politics is another. Too many leaders spoil the political broth.


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo